Measuring cough severity: Perspectives from the literature and from patients with chronic cough.

Margaret Vernon, Nancy Kline Leidy, Alise Nacson, Linda Nelsen
{"title":"Measuring cough severity: Perspectives from the literature and from patients with chronic cough.","authors":"Margaret Vernon,&nbsp;Nancy Kline Leidy,&nbsp;Alise Nacson,&nbsp;Linda Nelsen","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-5-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to assess severity of cough from patients' perspectives and capture the effects of treatment in clinical trials, a measurement tool must show evidence of validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to characterize cough severity from patients' perspectives as the initial step in the development of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for use in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This focus groups study included patients with clinician confirmed chronic cough recruited from a large internal medicine clinic in the US. A semi-structured focus group guide was designed to elicit information about patients' experiences with cough severity and their characterization of symptoms. The focus group data were coded to identify concepts and terminology of cough severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three focus groups were conducted [n = 22; 6 male; mean age 66.1 (+/- 12.9)]. Etiology included GERD, asthma, bronchitis, post-nasal drip, and other. Three domains of cough severity were identified: frequency, intensity, and disruption. In addition to a single cough, participants in all focus groups described coughing in uncontrollable paroxysms they called \"fits,\" \"bouts,\" \"spells,\" or \"episodes.\" The urge to cough, described as an important sign of impending cough, was considered a component of cough frequency. Participants also described daytime activity and nighttime sleep disruption as an indication of cough severity. Finally, participants described variability in cough severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that patients describe cough severity in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruptiveness, indicating these 3 domains should be addressed when evaluating cough severity and outcomes of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"5 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-5-5","citationCount":"57","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-5-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57

Abstract

Background: In order to assess severity of cough from patients' perspectives and capture the effects of treatment in clinical trials, a measurement tool must show evidence of validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to characterize cough severity from patients' perspectives as the initial step in the development of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for use in clinical trials.

Methods: This focus groups study included patients with clinician confirmed chronic cough recruited from a large internal medicine clinic in the US. A semi-structured focus group guide was designed to elicit information about patients' experiences with cough severity and their characterization of symptoms. The focus group data were coded to identify concepts and terminology of cough severity.

Results: Three focus groups were conducted [n = 22; 6 male; mean age 66.1 (+/- 12.9)]. Etiology included GERD, asthma, bronchitis, post-nasal drip, and other. Three domains of cough severity were identified: frequency, intensity, and disruption. In addition to a single cough, participants in all focus groups described coughing in uncontrollable paroxysms they called "fits," "bouts," "spells," or "episodes." The urge to cough, described as an important sign of impending cough, was considered a component of cough frequency. Participants also described daytime activity and nighttime sleep disruption as an indication of cough severity. Finally, participants described variability in cough severity.

Conclusion: Results suggest that patients describe cough severity in terms of frequency, intensity, and disruptiveness, indicating these 3 domains should be addressed when evaluating cough severity and outcomes of treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量咳嗽严重程度:从文献和慢性咳嗽患者的角度。
背景:为了从患者的角度评估咳嗽的严重程度,并在临床试验中捕捉治疗的效果,测量工具必须显示有效性和可靠性的证据。本研究的目的是从患者的角度来描述咳嗽严重程度,作为开发用于临床试验的新的患者报告结果(PRO)测量的第一步。方法:该焦点小组研究包括从美国一家大型内科诊所招募的临床医生确诊的慢性咳嗽患者。设计了半结构化焦点小组指南,以获取有关患者咳嗽严重程度的经历及其症状特征的信息。对焦点小组数据进行编码,以确定咳嗽严重程度的概念和术语。结果:共设3个焦点组[n = 22;6男;平均年龄66.1(+/- 12.9)。病因包括胃食管反流、哮喘、支气管炎、鼻后滴涕等。确定了咳嗽严重程度的三个领域:频率、强度和中断。除了一次咳嗽,所有焦点小组的参与者都描述了他们称之为“发作”、“发作”、“咒语”或“发作”的无法控制的发作性咳嗽。咳嗽的冲动被认为是即将咳嗽的重要标志,被认为是咳嗽频率的一个组成部分。参与者还将白天活动和夜间睡眠中断描述为咳嗽严重程度的一个指标。最后,参与者描述了咳嗽严重程度的变化。结论:结果提示患者从频率、强度和破坏性三个方面描述咳嗽严重程度,表明在评估咳嗽严重程度和治疗结果时应考虑这三个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A crossover randomized comparative study of zofenopril and ramipril on cough reflex and airway inflammation in healthy volunteers. Standardized method for solubility and storage of capsaicin-based solutions for cough induction. On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: an international qualitative study. Effect of acid suppression therapy on gastroesophageal reflux and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an intervention study. Severity of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with MUC5 B genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1