Modification of the forearm tourniquet techniques of intravenous regional anaesthesia for operations on the distal forearm and hand.

Ryan Frank, Bryce J Cowan, Scott Lang, Alan R Harrop, Enzio Magi
{"title":"Modification of the forearm tourniquet techniques of intravenous regional anaesthesia for operations on the distal forearm and hand.","authors":"Ryan Frank,&nbsp;Bryce J Cowan,&nbsp;Scott Lang,&nbsp;Alan R Harrop,&nbsp;Enzio Magi","doi":"10.1080/02844310802576420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our aim was to find out if a modified intravenous regional anaesthetic block technique, used for invasive surgical procedures on the distal forearm and hand, results in a drier operative field than traditional methods. Twenty consenting adult (age > 18) patients who were to have an operation on the distal forearm or hand were randomised into two groups (n=10 in each). The first group was using a traditional bier block, with a double upper arm tourniquet. The second group was using a modified regional anaesthetic block technique, with a single upper arm tourniquet, and a single forearm tourniquet. All operative fields were recorded photographically and judged by the operating surgeon as \"wet\" or \"dry\". Analgesic requirements and subjective pain were recorded. Plasma lignocaine concentrations were measured. \"Wet\" operative fields were seen in 6 of the conventional and 0 of the modified group (p=0.01). Patients in the modified group were more comfortable during the procedures (p=0.004). This benefit was not sustained postoperatively (p=0.57). Plasma lignocaine concentrations were higher in the conventional group (p=0.004). The modified technique was as safe as the conventional technique but has the benefits of a drier surgical field and improved intraoperative comfort for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49569,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"43 2","pages":"102-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02844310802576420","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310802576420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Our aim was to find out if a modified intravenous regional anaesthetic block technique, used for invasive surgical procedures on the distal forearm and hand, results in a drier operative field than traditional methods. Twenty consenting adult (age > 18) patients who were to have an operation on the distal forearm or hand were randomised into two groups (n=10 in each). The first group was using a traditional bier block, with a double upper arm tourniquet. The second group was using a modified regional anaesthetic block technique, with a single upper arm tourniquet, and a single forearm tourniquet. All operative fields were recorded photographically and judged by the operating surgeon as "wet" or "dry". Analgesic requirements and subjective pain were recorded. Plasma lignocaine concentrations were measured. "Wet" operative fields were seen in 6 of the conventional and 0 of the modified group (p=0.01). Patients in the modified group were more comfortable during the procedures (p=0.004). This benefit was not sustained postoperatively (p=0.57). Plasma lignocaine concentrations were higher in the conventional group (p=0.004). The modified technique was as safe as the conventional technique but has the benefits of a drier surgical field and improved intraoperative comfort for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前臂远端及手部静脉区域麻醉中前臂止血带技术的改进。
我们的目的是发现一种改良的静脉局部麻醉阻滞技术,用于前臂远端和手部的侵入性外科手术,是否比传统方法产生更干燥的手术野。20名同意在前臂远端或手部进行手术的成人(年龄> 18岁)患者随机分为两组(每组n=10)。第一组使用传统的棺木,并使用双上臂止血带。第二组采用改良的局部麻醉阻滞技术,使用单根上臂止血带和单根前臂止血带。所有手术野都被摄影记录下来,并由外科医生判断为“湿”或“干”。记录镇痛需求和主观疼痛。测定血浆里的利多卡因浓度。常规组手术野6例,改良组手术野0例(p=0.01)。改良组患者在手术过程中更舒适(p=0.004)。这种益处在术后没有持续(p=0.57)。常规组血浆中利多卡因浓度较高(p=0.004)。改进后的技术与传统技术一样安全,但具有更干燥的手术区域和提高患者术中舒适度的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New method of tunnelling for omental transposition in the treatment of a complex radionecrotic groin ulcer. Injection injury caused by puncture of the nozzle of a spray can. Successful management of tracheoinnominate artery fistula using a split pectoralis muscle flap with anatomical reconstruction by a synthetic graft. Quality of life after breast reconstruction: comparison of three methods. Surgical resection margins do not influence health related quality of life or emotional distress in patients with cutaneous melanoma: results of a prospective randomised trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1