C-reactive protein to initiate or withhold antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections in adults, in primary care: review.

Siggy Rausch, Maryse Flammang, Nico Haas, Romain Stein, Patrick Tabouring, Serge Delvigne, Danièle Holper, Caroline Jentges, Marion Pieger, Charlotte Lieunard, Catalina Iliescu
{"title":"C-reactive protein to initiate or withhold antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections in adults, in primary care: review.","authors":"Siggy Rausch,&nbsp;Maryse Flammang,&nbsp;Nico Haas,&nbsp;Romain Stein,&nbsp;Patrick Tabouring,&nbsp;Serge Delvigne,&nbsp;Danièle Holper,&nbsp;Caroline Jentges,&nbsp;Marion Pieger,&nbsp;Charlotte Lieunard,&nbsp;Catalina Iliescu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a discrepancy between the incidence of viral pathogens and the frequency of prescribing antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). Typically, primary care physicians have few possibilities to order sophisticated laboratory tests to help distinguish viral pathogens from bacterial pathogens. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measurement could help the primary care physician to discriminate more easily between these two conditions, and should contribute to reducing unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics during the first patient consultation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was performed in order to see what is known and tested about CRP measurement in ARTIs in adult patients in the primary care setting, to assist GPs in their decision whether or not to prescribe antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 54 entered articles reviewed from 109 abstracts, we could identify 8 articles which correspond to our selection criteria. Overall the methodological quality of the studies is heterogeneous. Specificity and sensibility of CRP measurement in ARTIs in adults vary widely from as low as 10% to as high as 99%.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Current literature is insufficient and too heterogeneous to allow conclusions about the value of CRP measurement to support the decision of prescribing antibiotics for ARTIs in adults, in primary care. Most studies tested CRP in view of an aetiological diagnosis of ARTIs, whereas common practice in primary care is oriented pragmatically towards risk management and watchful waiting when 'dangerous' symptoms are absent. We found sufficient evidence that CRP would be a useful biomarker in this perspective, but thorough and rigorous studies are needed to test this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":72476,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Societe des sciences medicales du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Societe des sciences medicales du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a discrepancy between the incidence of viral pathogens and the frequency of prescribing antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). Typically, primary care physicians have few possibilities to order sophisticated laboratory tests to help distinguish viral pathogens from bacterial pathogens. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measurement could help the primary care physician to discriminate more easily between these two conditions, and should contribute to reducing unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics during the first patient consultation.

Methods: A literature review was performed in order to see what is known and tested about CRP measurement in ARTIs in adult patients in the primary care setting, to assist GPs in their decision whether or not to prescribe antibiotics.

Results: Out of 54 entered articles reviewed from 109 abstracts, we could identify 8 articles which correspond to our selection criteria. Overall the methodological quality of the studies is heterogeneous. Specificity and sensibility of CRP measurement in ARTIs in adults vary widely from as low as 10% to as high as 99%.

Discussion and conclusion: Current literature is insufficient and too heterogeneous to allow conclusions about the value of CRP measurement to support the decision of prescribing antibiotics for ARTIs in adults, in primary care. Most studies tested CRP in view of an aetiological diagnosis of ARTIs, whereas common practice in primary care is oriented pragmatically towards risk management and watchful waiting when 'dangerous' symptoms are absent. We found sufficient evidence that CRP would be a useful biomarker in this perspective, but thorough and rigorous studies are needed to test this hypothesis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
c反应蛋白与初级保健中成人急性呼吸道感染启动或停用抗生素的关系:综述
背景:病毒性病原体的发病率与急性呼吸道感染(ARTIs)的抗生素处方频率之间存在差异。通常,初级保健医生很少有可能安排复杂的实验室检查来帮助区分病毒性病原体和细菌性病原体。c -反应蛋白(CRP)测量可以帮助初级保健医生更容易地区分这两种情况,并有助于减少患者首次就诊时不必要的抗生素处方。方法:进行文献综述,以了解初级保健机构中成人ARTIs患者CRP测量的已知和测试情况,以帮助全科医生决定是否开抗生素。结果:在109篇摘要的54篇入选文章中,我们筛选出8篇符合我们的选择标准。总的来说,这些研究的方法学质量参差不齐。成人ARTIs中CRP测量的特异性和敏感性差异很大,低至10%,高至99%。讨论和结论:目前的文献是不充分的,也太不一致,不能得出关于CRP测量值的结论来支持在初级保健中为成人ARTIs开抗生素处方的决定。大多数研究检测CRP是为了对ARTIs进行病因学诊断,而初级保健的常见做法是在没有“危险”症状的情况下进行风险管理和观察等待。我们发现了足够的证据表明CRP将是一个有用的生物标志物,但需要彻底和严格的研究来验证这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immune Network Case Report: Primary Spinal Lymphoma. [In process]. Treating the emotional and motivational inhibition of highly gifted underachievers with music psychotherapy: Meta-analysis of an evaluation study based on a sequential design. [In process]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1