[A variant of DDRT-PCR using anchored mini-exon primers for identification of differentially expressed sequences in Leishmania infantum].

L Turki-Mannoubi, H Kbaier-Hachemi, M Barhoumi, A S Chakroun, I Guizani
{"title":"[A variant of DDRT-PCR using anchored mini-exon primers for identification of differentially expressed sequences in Leishmania infantum].","authors":"L Turki-Mannoubi,&nbsp;H Kbaier-Hachemi,&nbsp;M Barhoumi,&nbsp;A S Chakroun,&nbsp;I Guizani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leishmania infantum (L.i) is responsible for visceral (VL) or cutaneous (CL) leishmaniasis. Previous studies done in Honduras by differential display reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (DDRT-PCR) failed to demonstrate differences in expression profiles among L. infantum VL and CL parasites. For purpose of comparing expression among L. infantum isolates in Tunisia, a variant of this technique adapted from a commercial kit was developed involving pairs of random and anchored mini-exon primers for isolation and identification of differentially displayed cDNAs. To assess the efficiency of this variant, 34 pairs were applied to 2 consecutive dilutions of cDNAs from promastigotes at end of in vitro exponential growth of 2 visceral (LV50) and cutaneous (DREP14) isolates from Tunisia, thus increasing chance for observing differences among the cDNAs. Profiles were compared and analyzed as regards number and phenotype of bands displayed in 4 types of highly similar amplification profiles among the 2 cDNAs; 26 primer pair combinations generated in total 6.8% differentially displayed bands that had variable intensities or were present/absent, in comparable proportions in the 2 isolates. Analysis further demonstrated differences in amplification efficiency of some primers, emphasizing on qualitative and quantitative impact of relative proximity of the priming sites. Nine present/absent bands were cloned, sequenced and analyzed in silico. Mismatches at priming sites seem to underlie amplification of such bands. Only five products could be referred to annotated gene. Among the genes identified, we list histone H4, largely known to be differentially expressed among L.i stages, and \"NTF2-like\" for which overexpression in one cDNA was here confirmed. To conclude, the variant developed could be used further in Leishmania expression analysis with appropriate cautions about false positives.</p>","PeriodicalId":75537,"journal":{"name":"Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis","volume":"85 1-4","pages":"29-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leishmania infantum (L.i) is responsible for visceral (VL) or cutaneous (CL) leishmaniasis. Previous studies done in Honduras by differential display reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (DDRT-PCR) failed to demonstrate differences in expression profiles among L. infantum VL and CL parasites. For purpose of comparing expression among L. infantum isolates in Tunisia, a variant of this technique adapted from a commercial kit was developed involving pairs of random and anchored mini-exon primers for isolation and identification of differentially displayed cDNAs. To assess the efficiency of this variant, 34 pairs were applied to 2 consecutive dilutions of cDNAs from promastigotes at end of in vitro exponential growth of 2 visceral (LV50) and cutaneous (DREP14) isolates from Tunisia, thus increasing chance for observing differences among the cDNAs. Profiles were compared and analyzed as regards number and phenotype of bands displayed in 4 types of highly similar amplification profiles among the 2 cDNAs; 26 primer pair combinations generated in total 6.8% differentially displayed bands that had variable intensities or were present/absent, in comparable proportions in the 2 isolates. Analysis further demonstrated differences in amplification efficiency of some primers, emphasizing on qualitative and quantitative impact of relative proximity of the priming sites. Nine present/absent bands were cloned, sequenced and analyzed in silico. Mismatches at priming sites seem to underlie amplification of such bands. Only five products could be referred to annotated gene. Among the genes identified, we list histone H4, largely known to be differentially expressed among L.i stages, and "NTF2-like" for which overexpression in one cDNA was here confirmed. To conclude, the variant developed could be used further in Leishmania expression analysis with appropriate cautions about false positives.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[一种DDRT-PCR的变体,使用锚定的迷你外显子引物来鉴定婴儿利什曼原虫的差异表达序列]。
婴儿利什曼原虫(L.i)负责内脏(VL)或皮肤(CL)利什曼病。先前在洪都拉斯通过差异显示逆转录聚合酶链反应(DDRT-PCR)进行的研究未能证明婴儿乳杆菌VL和CL寄生虫的表达谱存在差异。为了比较突尼斯婴儿乳杆菌分离株的表达,开发了一种基于商业试剂盒的该技术的变体,涉及对随机和固定的迷你外显子引物,用于分离和鉴定差异显示的cdna。为了评估该变异的效率,在突尼斯2个内脏(LV50)和皮肤(DREP14)分离物的体外指数生长结束时,连续两次稀释来自promastigotes的34对cdna,从而增加了观察cdna差异的机会。比较分析2种cdna高度相似扩增图谱中4种类型条带的数量和表型;26对引物组合共产生6.8%的差异显示条带,这些条带具有可变强度或存在/不存在,在2个分离株中所占比例相当。分析进一步证明了一些引物的扩增效率差异,强调了引物位置相对接近的定性和定量影响。9个存在/缺失的条带被克隆、测序和分析。启动位点的不匹配似乎是这些条带扩增的基础。只有5个产物可以被标记基因引用。在鉴定的基因中,我们列出了组蛋白H4,主要已知在i期之间存在差异表达,以及“ntf2样”,其中一个cDNA在这里被证实过表达。总之,该变异可进一步用于利什曼原虫的表达分析,但需注意假阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALYSIS OF BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC FACTORS INFLUENCING THE OCCURRENCE OF WEST NILE VIRUS INFECTION IN TUNISIA. LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS IN DIAGNOSTIC TESTS EVALUATION FOR CANINE LEISHMANIA INFANTUM INFECTION. [Bacteriological profile and antibiotic treatment of postoperative peritonitis]. [Postoperative peritonitis: pronostic factors of mortality]. [Snake venom Kunitz/BPTI family: Structure, classification and pharmacological potential].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1