Introduction: for a comparative history of the birth of "scientific" psychology.

Guido Cimino
{"title":"Introduction: for a comparative history of the birth of \"scientific\" psychology.","authors":"Guido Cimino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This introduction to the Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium poses the problem of the birth of a \"new psychology\" that endeavors to become a science, considered within the cultural, scientific, social, and institutional context of each country. This problem can be subdivided into a series of other more specific questions, dealt with in part by the volume's contributions: the distinction between a \"scientific\" psychology and a \"pre-scientific\" one; the historical reconstruction of psychology as a \"science,\" and of psychology as a \"discipline\" embedded in some institution; the time span in which the passage from the \"old\" to the \"new\" was achieved; the scientific-cultural and political-economic-social factors or conditions that influenced and favoured this birth. After a panoramic and \"comparative\" glance at the situation in different European countries (Germany, France, England, Italy, Spain, and Russia) and some extra-European ones (United States, Brazil, Japan, and China), as presented in the texts of these Proceedings, there follow some considerations of a general nature that attempt to highlight analogies and differences in the historical development of the origin of \"scientific\" psychology in the various countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":82321,"journal":{"name":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","volume":"43 1-2","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physis; rivista internazionale di storia della scienza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This introduction to the Proceedings of the Beijing Symposium poses the problem of the birth of a "new psychology" that endeavors to become a science, considered within the cultural, scientific, social, and institutional context of each country. This problem can be subdivided into a series of other more specific questions, dealt with in part by the volume's contributions: the distinction between a "scientific" psychology and a "pre-scientific" one; the historical reconstruction of psychology as a "science," and of psychology as a "discipline" embedded in some institution; the time span in which the passage from the "old" to the "new" was achieved; the scientific-cultural and political-economic-social factors or conditions that influenced and favoured this birth. After a panoramic and "comparative" glance at the situation in different European countries (Germany, France, England, Italy, Spain, and Russia) and some extra-European ones (United States, Brazil, Japan, and China), as presented in the texts of these Proceedings, there follow some considerations of a general nature that attempt to highlight analogies and differences in the historical development of the origin of "scientific" psychology in the various countries.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介:为“科学”心理学诞生的比较史。
这篇《北京研讨会论文集》的引言提出了一个“新心理学”的诞生问题,它努力成为一门科学,在每个国家的文化、科学、社会和制度背景下进行考虑。这个问题可以细分为一系列其他更具体的问题,部分处理由卷的贡献:“科学”心理学和“前科学”的区别;心理学作为一门“科学”的历史重建,以及心理学作为一门嵌入某些机构的“学科”的历史重建;从“旧”过渡到“新”的时间跨度;影响和促进这一诞生的科学文化和政治经济社会因素或条件。在对不同的欧洲国家(德国、法国、英国、意大利、西班牙和俄罗斯)和一些欧洲以外的国家(美国、巴西、日本和中国)的情况进行全景和“比较”的一瞥之后,在这些会议记录的文本中,有一些一般性的考虑,试图突出各国“科学”心理学起源的历史发展的相似性和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FRANCO RASETTI, A ASCIENTIS ACROSS PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY. IL SORRISO DEL BABBUINO. I PROBLEMI DELL'EVOLUZIONE VISTI DA UN FISICO. DECLINAZIONI DEL RAPPORTO PSICOLOGIA0FILOSOFIA: RIFLESSI SULL'INSEGNAMENTO ACCADEMICO NELL'INCHIESTA DI ENZO BONAVENTURA DEL 1914. MODELLI CHIMICI DEL VIVENTE LE ORIGINI DEL CENCETTO DI «MACCHINA CHIMICA». LE RICERCHE SPERIMENTALI DI ENZO BONAVENTURA SUL TEMPO SICOLOGICO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1