Understanding the intersection of individual needs and choices with organizational practices: the case of medication management in assisted living.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2009-08-01 Epub Date: 2009-06-02 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnp063
Paula C Carder, Sheryl Zimmerman, John G Schumacher
{"title":"Understanding the intersection of individual needs and choices with organizational practices: the case of medication management in assisted living.","authors":"Paula C Carder, Sheryl Zimmerman, John G Schumacher","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnp063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE Making choices about everyday activities is a normal event for many adults. However, when an adult moves into an assisted living (AL) community, making choices becomes complicated by perceived needs and community practices. This study examines the relationship between choice and need in the context of practices, using medication administration practices as the case in point. DESIGN AND METHODS A 5-year ethnographic study collected information from 6 AL settings in Maryland. Ethnographic interviews (n = 323) and field notes comprise the data described in this article. RESULTS AL organizations used practice rationales based on state regulations, professional responsibility, safety concerns, and social model values to describe and explain their setting-specific practices. The result was varying levels of congruence between the setting's practices and individual resident's needs and choices. That is, in some cases, the resident's needs were lost to the organization's practices, and in other cases, organizations adapted to resident need and choices. These findings suggest that individuals and organizations adapt to each other, resulting in practices that are not bound by state requirement or other practice rationales. IMPLICATIONS AL residences vary due to both internal and external forces, not just the public policies that define them. State regulations need to be responsive to both the needs and the choices of individual residents and to the people who work in an AL.","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":"49 4","pages":"463-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/geront/gnp063","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

PURPOSE Making choices about everyday activities is a normal event for many adults. However, when an adult moves into an assisted living (AL) community, making choices becomes complicated by perceived needs and community practices. This study examines the relationship between choice and need in the context of practices, using medication administration practices as the case in point. DESIGN AND METHODS A 5-year ethnographic study collected information from 6 AL settings in Maryland. Ethnographic interviews (n = 323) and field notes comprise the data described in this article. RESULTS AL organizations used practice rationales based on state regulations, professional responsibility, safety concerns, and social model values to describe and explain their setting-specific practices. The result was varying levels of congruence between the setting's practices and individual resident's needs and choices. That is, in some cases, the resident's needs were lost to the organization's practices, and in other cases, organizations adapted to resident need and choices. These findings suggest that individuals and organizations adapt to each other, resulting in practices that are not bound by state requirement or other practice rationales. IMPLICATIONS AL residences vary due to both internal and external forces, not just the public policies that define them. State regulations need to be responsive to both the needs and the choices of individual residents and to the people who work in an AL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解个人需求和选择与组织实践的交集:辅助生活中的药物管理案例。
目的:对许多成年人来说,选择日常活动是一件很正常的事情。然而,当一个成年人进入辅助生活(AL)社区时,由于感知需求和社区实践,做出选择变得复杂。本研究考察了选择和需要之间的关系,在实践的背景下,使用药物管理实践为例。设计和方法:一项为期5年的民族志研究收集了马里兰州6个人工智能设置的信息。人种学访谈(n = 323)和实地记录构成了本文中描述的数据。结果:人工智能组织使用基于国家法规、专业责任、安全问题和社会模式价值的实践原理来描述和解释他们的特定环境实践。其结果是不同程度的一致性设置的做法和个人居民的需求和选择。也就是说,在某些情况下,居民的需求失去了组织的实践,在其他情况下,组织适应居民的需求和选择。这些发现表明,个人和组织相互适应,导致实践不受国家要求或其他实践理由的约束。含义:人工智能住宅因内部和外部力量而变化,而不仅仅是定义它们的公共政策。国家法规需要对居民个人和人工智能工作人员的需求和选择做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Living Beyond Loss by Robert Neimeyer. Exploring the Cognitive Aspects of Walking in the Neighbourhoods among People Living with Dementia. Exploring Older Adults' Engagement with Socially-Assistive-Robots using AI: Personas, Patterns, and Psychosocial Outcomes. Navigating Late-Life Parental Care Transitions: Implications for Adult Children's Psychosocial Well-Being. Sentimental Value and the value of sentiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1