Acute surgical removal of low-grade (Spetzler-Martin I-II) bleeding arteriovenous malformations

Giacomo Pavesi MD , Oriela Rustemi MD , Silvia Berlucchi MD , Anna Chiara Frigo MD , Valerio Gerunda RT , Renato Scienza MD
{"title":"Acute surgical removal of low-grade (Spetzler-Martin I-II) bleeding arteriovenous malformations","authors":"Giacomo Pavesi MD ,&nbsp;Oriela Rustemi MD ,&nbsp;Silvia Berlucchi MD ,&nbsp;Anna Chiara Frigo MD ,&nbsp;Valerio Gerunda RT ,&nbsp;Renato Scienza MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Early surgical removal of cerebral AVMs is a relatively infrequent therapeutic option when dealing with a cerebral hemorrhage caused by AVM rupture: even in the case of low-grade AVMs, delayed treatment is, if possible, preferred because it is considered safer for patients and more comfortable for surgeons. To assess whether acute surgery may be a safe and effective management, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our early surgery strategy for ruptured low-grade AVMs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed 27 patients with SM grade I-II AVM treated during 2004 to 2008 in the acute stage of bleeding (within the first 6 days after bleed). All patients showed a cerebral AVM on DSA at admission, and surgical removal was controlled by postoperative angiography. Neurological outcomes were assessed with GOS. The average length of follow-up was 22 months (48-3 months).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Before surgery, 16 (59%) patients showed a GCS of 8 or less, 2 of them presenting an acute rebleeding after first hemorrhage. All patients underwent radical AVM surgical removal and hematoma evacuation in a single-stage procedure. Most patients (78%) were operated within the first day of hemorrhage. A favorable functional outcome (GOS: good recovery or moderate disability) was observed in 23 patients (85%). Mortality was 7.4%. Outcome was not significantly correlated with GCS at presentation and with presence of preoperative anisocoria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Early surgery for grade I-II AVMs is a safe and definitive treatment, achieving both immediate cerebral decompression and patient protection against rebleeding, reducing time of hospital stay and allowing a more rapid rehabilitative course whenever necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22153,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology","volume":"72 6","pages":"Pages 662-667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.035","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090301909003413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background

Early surgical removal of cerebral AVMs is a relatively infrequent therapeutic option when dealing with a cerebral hemorrhage caused by AVM rupture: even in the case of low-grade AVMs, delayed treatment is, if possible, preferred because it is considered safer for patients and more comfortable for surgeons. To assess whether acute surgery may be a safe and effective management, we conducted a retrospective analysis of our early surgery strategy for ruptured low-grade AVMs.

Methods

We reviewed 27 patients with SM grade I-II AVM treated during 2004 to 2008 in the acute stage of bleeding (within the first 6 days after bleed). All patients showed a cerebral AVM on DSA at admission, and surgical removal was controlled by postoperative angiography. Neurological outcomes were assessed with GOS. The average length of follow-up was 22 months (48-3 months).

Results

Before surgery, 16 (59%) patients showed a GCS of 8 or less, 2 of them presenting an acute rebleeding after first hemorrhage. All patients underwent radical AVM surgical removal and hematoma evacuation in a single-stage procedure. Most patients (78%) were operated within the first day of hemorrhage. A favorable functional outcome (GOS: good recovery or moderate disability) was observed in 23 patients (85%). Mortality was 7.4%. Outcome was not significantly correlated with GCS at presentation and with presence of preoperative anisocoria.

Conclusions

Early surgery for grade I-II AVMs is a safe and definitive treatment, achieving both immediate cerebral decompression and patient protection against rebleeding, reducing time of hospital stay and allowing a more rapid rehabilitative course whenever necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性手术切除低级别(Spetzler-Martin I-II)出血动静脉畸形
背景:当处理由动静脉畸形破裂引起的脑出血时,外科手术切除脑动静脉畸形是一种相对少见的治疗选择:即使是低级别动静脉畸形,如果可能的话,延迟治疗是首选,因为它被认为对患者更安全,对外科医生更舒适。为了评估急性手术是否是一种安全有效的治疗方法,我们对低级别动静脉畸形破裂的早期手术策略进行了回顾性分析。方法回顾性分析2004 ~ 2008年收治的27例急性期(出血后6天内)SM级1 ~ 2级AVM患者的临床资料。所有患者入院时均在DSA上显示脑AVM,术后血管造影控制手术切除。用GOS评估神经学预后。平均随访时间22个月(48 ~ 3个月)。结果术前16例(59%)患者GCS≤8分,其中2例首次出血后出现急性再出血。所有患者均在单阶段手术中接受根治性动静脉畸形手术切除和血肿清除。大多数患者(78%)在出血的第一天内手术。在23例(85%)患者中观察到良好的功能结局(GOS:良好恢复或中度残疾)。死亡率为7.4%。结果与首发时的GCS和术前有无异角无显著相关。结论早期手术治疗I-II级动静脉畸形是一种安全可靠的治疗方法,既能实现即时脑减压,又能防止患者再出血,缩短住院时间,并在必要时加快康复过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Neurology
Surgical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac ventricular myosin and slow skeletal myosin exhibit dissimilar chemomechanical properties despite bearing the same myosin heavy chain isoform. Moyamoya disease. PNIPAAM modified mesoporous hydroxyapatite for sustained osteogenic drug release and promoting cell attachment. Biomedical research Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1