{"title":"Designing effective health care quality transparency initiatives.","authors":"Ha T Tu, Johanna R Lauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the many health care quality transparency initiatives introduced in recent years, two state-based programs stand out for thoughtful design, implementation and usable, useful data: CalHospitalCompare, a report card for California hospitals, and Massachusetts Health Quality Partners, a report card for Massachusetts primary care physician groups. According to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) analysis, both programs share key elements that contribute to their effectiveness: engaging and collaborating with the provider community from the outset; paying particular attention to the caliber of the quality data reported; presenting the quality data to consumers in formats that are easy to understand and remember; and providing hospitals and physicians with detailed information on their own performance. Quality transparency initiatives that do not focus sufficiently on these key design and implementation elements are unlikely to influence quality improvement in a meaningful way.</p>","PeriodicalId":80012,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","volume":" 126","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Among the many health care quality transparency initiatives introduced in recent years, two state-based programs stand out for thoughtful design, implementation and usable, useful data: CalHospitalCompare, a report card for California hospitals, and Massachusetts Health Quality Partners, a report card for Massachusetts primary care physician groups. According to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) analysis, both programs share key elements that contribute to their effectiveness: engaging and collaborating with the provider community from the outset; paying particular attention to the caliber of the quality data reported; presenting the quality data to consumers in formats that are easy to understand and remember; and providing hospitals and physicians with detailed information on their own performance. Quality transparency initiatives that do not focus sufficiently on these key design and implementation elements are unlikely to influence quality improvement in a meaningful way.
在近年来推出的许多医疗保健质量透明度倡议中,有两个基于州的项目因其深思熟虑的设计、实施和可用、有用的数据而脱颖而出:CalHospitalCompare(加州医院的成绩单)和Massachusetts health quality Partners(马萨诸塞州初级保健医生团体的成绩单)。根据研究卫生系统变革(HSC)的一项新分析,这两个项目都有有助于其有效性的关键要素:从一开始就与提供者社区参与和合作;特别注意所报告的质量数据的质量;以易于理解和记忆的格式向消费者呈现高质量的数据;并为医院和医生提供他们自身表现的详细信息。没有充分关注这些关键设计和实施要素的质量透明度倡议不太可能以有意义的方式影响质量改进。