[Prevention of the acute tolerence with fentanyl by ketamine].

Dakar medical Pub Date : 2008-01-01
M Ndoye Diop, Y Khalil, B Diatta, M Seck, M Ndiaye, B Niang, K H Wade, A Wade
{"title":"[Prevention of the acute tolerence with fentanyl by ketamine].","authors":"M Ndoye Diop,&nbsp;Y Khalil,&nbsp;B Diatta,&nbsp;M Seck,&nbsp;M Ndiaye,&nbsp;B Niang,&nbsp;K H Wade,&nbsp;A Wade","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate in under developed country where post operative pain management inadequate the efficiency of the prevention of this acute tolerance with opioids by the ketamine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We did a prospective study on months period (January 2004 to June 2004). The setting was the HPD surgical unit recovery room. The patients of more than 15 years and less than 60 years who underwent painful or fairly painful surgical operation under general anaesthesia were included. The patients intubés,ventilated and sedated in the recovery room were excluded from the study .The patients were divided into two groups: in group 1 the patients were given 100 microg/kg of ketamine 15 mn before induction. In group 2 the patients where given a placebo 15 mn before induction. The fentanyl was used systematically during induction at the dosage of 5 microg/kg. The quality of per-operative analgesia was evaluated by the appreciation of the heart rate and the blood pressure. The DPO was evaluated by the analogical visual scale (EV A) at the entrance and the exit of the recovery room, and at the 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th hour after the surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hundred and thirteen (113) patient were included in the study (groupel with ketamine: 56 patients, groupe 2 without ketamine: 57). The average age was 30 years with extremes from 16 to 60 years. In group 1 and preoperatively 5.9% of the patients receided additional fentanyl ranging from 50 to 100 microg/kg against 47.7% in group 2. In the post-operative period, the morphine consumption was 22.02% for the Group 1 and 43.37% for Group 2. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant. A case of restlessness was noted in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low dose ketamine seems to be effective for the prevention of the postoperative severe pain induced by the fentanyl. It allows also an improvement of the quality of per-operational analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":75773,"journal":{"name":"Dakar medical","volume":"53 2","pages":"122-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dakar medical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to evaluate in under developed country where post operative pain management inadequate the efficiency of the prevention of this acute tolerance with opioids by the ketamine.

Materials and methods: We did a prospective study on months period (January 2004 to June 2004). The setting was the HPD surgical unit recovery room. The patients of more than 15 years and less than 60 years who underwent painful or fairly painful surgical operation under general anaesthesia were included. The patients intubés,ventilated and sedated in the recovery room were excluded from the study .The patients were divided into two groups: in group 1 the patients were given 100 microg/kg of ketamine 15 mn before induction. In group 2 the patients where given a placebo 15 mn before induction. The fentanyl was used systematically during induction at the dosage of 5 microg/kg. The quality of per-operative analgesia was evaluated by the appreciation of the heart rate and the blood pressure. The DPO was evaluated by the analogical visual scale (EV A) at the entrance and the exit of the recovery room, and at the 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th hour after the surgery.

Results: Hundred and thirteen (113) patient were included in the study (groupel with ketamine: 56 patients, groupe 2 without ketamine: 57). The average age was 30 years with extremes from 16 to 60 years. In group 1 and preoperatively 5.9% of the patients receided additional fentanyl ranging from 50 to 100 microg/kg against 47.7% in group 2. In the post-operative period, the morphine consumption was 22.02% for the Group 1 and 43.37% for Group 2. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant. A case of restlessness was noted in group 1.

Conclusion: The low dose ketamine seems to be effective for the prevention of the postoperative severe pain induced by the fentanyl. It allows also an improvement of the quality of per-operational analgesia.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[氯胺酮预防芬太尼急性耐受]。
本研究的目的是评估在欠发达国家,术后疼痛管理不足,氯胺酮预防这种急性阿片类药物耐受的效率。材料与方法:采用前瞻性研究(2004年1月- 2004年6月)。地点是火奴鲁鲁警局外科手术室的恢复室。年龄在15岁以上和60岁以下的患者在全身麻醉下进行疼痛或相当疼痛的外科手术。排除在恢复室插管、通气、镇静的患者,将患者分为两组:1组患者在诱导前15mn给予氯胺酮100 μ g/kg;第二组患者在诱导前15分钟给予安慰剂。诱导过程中系统使用芬太尼,剂量为5微克/千克。通过心率和血压的变化来评价术中镇痛的质量。术后4、8、12、24小时分别在恢复室入口、出口及术后4、8、12、24小时采用类比视觉量表(EV A)评价DPO。结果:共纳入113例患者(使用氯胺酮组56例,未使用氯胺酮组57例)。平均年龄为30岁,极端年龄为16至60岁。在第1组和术前,5.9%的患者接受了50至100微克/公斤的芬太尼额外治疗,而第2组为47.7%。术后吗啡用量1组为22.02%,2组为43.37%。两组之间的差异有统计学意义。1组有一例躁动。结论:小剂量氯胺酮可有效预防芬太尼术后引起的剧烈疼痛。它还可以改善术前镇痛的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic Abscess [Perforation and haemorrhage duodenal bulbar ulcers in a child: a case report]. [Management of exocrin pancreatic tumor. About 129 cases]. [Hand washing at Fann hospital: investigation among health workers]. [Nephrotic syndrom with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in Dakar: epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics (about 134 cases)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1