Boundary conditions in simulation of stenosed coronary arteries.

Hadi Mohammadi, Fereshteh Bahramian
{"title":"Boundary conditions in simulation of stenosed coronary arteries.","authors":"Hadi Mohammadi,&nbsp;Fereshteh Bahramian","doi":"10.1007/s10558-009-9078-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A powerful alternative means to studying hemodynamics in diseased or healthy coronary arteries can be achieved by providing a numerical model in which blood flow can be virtually simulated, for instance, using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. In fact, it is well documented that CFD allows reliable physiological blood flow simulation and measurements of flow parameters. A requisite for obtaining reliable results from coronary CFD is to use exact anatomical models and realistic boundary conditions. To date, in almost all of the modeling studies on hemodynamics of stenosed coronary arteries, a velocity based boundary conditions has been assigned. The objective of this study is to show that inlet velocity actually depends on the degree of stenosis and thus for severe constriction in coronary artery, a velocity based boundary conditions cannot be realistic. We then prove that regardless of severity of stenosis in coronary arteries, the upstream pressure, systemic pressure, is always constant, thus, should be used as boundary conditions instead. The two sets of boundary conditions are implemented to demonstrate the robustness of each in modeling of stenosed coronary artery in a CFD study. These boundary conditions are applied in a stenosed cylindrical pipe including three categories of symmetrical stenosis (mild, moderate and severe stenosis starting from 15 to 95% diameter reduction) for steady state and pulsatile flow. Results strongly indicate that inlet velocity boundary conditions are no longer valid when effective diameter in stenosis goes below approximately 2.8 mm (a healthy diameter is considered 3.2 mm) which corresponds to 10-15% diameter reduction. Further work will determine the effect of flow reduction on the oxygen tension in blood to better define conditions for clinical symptoms such as angina.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":"9 3","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-009-9078-z","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-009-9078-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

A powerful alternative means to studying hemodynamics in diseased or healthy coronary arteries can be achieved by providing a numerical model in which blood flow can be virtually simulated, for instance, using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. In fact, it is well documented that CFD allows reliable physiological blood flow simulation and measurements of flow parameters. A requisite for obtaining reliable results from coronary CFD is to use exact anatomical models and realistic boundary conditions. To date, in almost all of the modeling studies on hemodynamics of stenosed coronary arteries, a velocity based boundary conditions has been assigned. The objective of this study is to show that inlet velocity actually depends on the degree of stenosis and thus for severe constriction in coronary artery, a velocity based boundary conditions cannot be realistic. We then prove that regardless of severity of stenosis in coronary arteries, the upstream pressure, systemic pressure, is always constant, thus, should be used as boundary conditions instead. The two sets of boundary conditions are implemented to demonstrate the robustness of each in modeling of stenosed coronary artery in a CFD study. These boundary conditions are applied in a stenosed cylindrical pipe including three categories of symmetrical stenosis (mild, moderate and severe stenosis starting from 15 to 95% diameter reduction) for steady state and pulsatile flow. Results strongly indicate that inlet velocity boundary conditions are no longer valid when effective diameter in stenosis goes below approximately 2.8 mm (a healthy diameter is considered 3.2 mm) which corresponds to 10-15% diameter reduction. Further work will determine the effect of flow reduction on the oxygen tension in blood to better define conditions for clinical symptoms such as angina.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉狭窄模拟中的边界条件。
研究病变或健康冠状动脉血流动力学的一种强有力的替代方法是提供一种可以虚拟模拟血流的数值模型,例如,使用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法。事实上,有充分的证据表明,CFD允许可靠的生理血流模拟和流量参数的测量。精确的解剖模型和真实的边界条件是获得可靠的冠状动脉CFD计算结果的必要条件。迄今为止,在几乎所有关于狭窄冠状动脉血流动力学的建模研究中,都指定了一个基于速度的边界条件。本研究的目的是表明入口速度实际上取决于狭窄程度,因此对于冠状动脉严重狭窄,基于速度的边界条件是不现实的。然后我们证明,无论冠状动脉狭窄的严重程度如何,上游压力,即全身压力始终是恒定的,因此,应将其作为边界条件。在CFD研究中,采用了两组边界条件来证明各自在冠状动脉狭窄建模中的鲁棒性。这些边界条件应用于包括三种对称狭窄(轻度、中度和重度狭窄,直径减小15%至95%)的狭窄圆柱管,用于稳态和脉动流动。结果强烈表明,当狭窄的有效直径小于约2.8 mm(健康直径为3.2 mm)时,进口速度边界条件不再有效,相当于直径减小10-15%。进一步的工作将确定血流减少对血液中氧张力的影响,以更好地确定诸如心绞痛等临床症状的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Bioprinting of a Tissue Engineered Human Heart Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 2: From Fabrication to Optimization Square Root Design for Natural Frequency Module of Dynamic ECG Features—a Preliminary Study Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 1: From Conception to Materials Selection Biopolymers as Potential Carrier for Effervescent Reaction Based Drug Delivery System in Gastrointestinal Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1