Mike G. Martin, John S. Welch, Kristan Augustin, Lindsay Hladnik, John F. DiPersio, Camille N. Abboud
{"title":"Cladribine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience","authors":"Mike G. Martin, John S. Welch, Kristan Augustin, Lindsay Hladnik, John F. DiPersio, Camille N. Abboud","doi":"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advances in novel therapeutics, supportive care, and postremission therapy, the outcome of high-risk and elderly patients as well as those with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. There is likely still room for improvement through optimizing conventional chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Through a pharmacy database search we identified all patients with AML treated at Washington University with cladribine-based regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four patients were identified that were treated with 2 cladribine-based regimens: CLAG (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; 300 μg subcutaneously (s.c.) days 0-5]) and CLAM (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], G-CSF [300 mg s.c. days 0-5] and mitoxantrone [10 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-3]). Complete responses were achieved in 53% of patients given induction chemotherapy and 44% of those given salvage chemotherapy. The regimens were well tolerated with minimal extramedullary toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These data suggest that cladrabine-based regimens should be further explored in both the salvage and first-line setting and might offer an attractive backbone on which to add novel therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100272,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011700051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
Abstract
Background
Despite advances in novel therapeutics, supportive care, and postremission therapy, the outcome of high-risk and elderly patients as well as those with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. There is likely still room for improvement through optimizing conventional chemotherapy.
Patients and Methods
Through a pharmacy database search we identified all patients with AML treated at Washington University with cladribine-based regimens.
Results
Twenty-four patients were identified that were treated with 2 cladribine-based regimens: CLAG (cladribine [5 mg/m2 days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m2 days 1-5] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; 300 μg subcutaneously (s.c.) days 0-5]) and CLAM (cladribine [5 mg/m2 days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m2 days 1-5], G-CSF [300 mg s.c. days 0-5] and mitoxantrone [10 mg/m2 days 1-3]). Complete responses were achieved in 53% of patients given induction chemotherapy and 44% of those given salvage chemotherapy. The regimens were well tolerated with minimal extramedullary toxicity.
Conclusion
These data suggest that cladrabine-based regimens should be further explored in both the salvage and first-line setting and might offer an attractive backbone on which to add novel therapies.