Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.

M H Bahrami, S M Rayegani, F Nouri
{"title":"Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.","authors":"M H Bahrami,&nbsp;S M Rayegani,&nbsp;F Nouri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"259-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内插法在腕管综合征诊断中的应用研究及与掌心抗皮感觉法的比较。
腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的局灶性压迫神经病。有许多不同的方法可用于评估腕管处正中神经受损的患者。其中之一是由E.B. Bodofski博士发明的插值方法。在我们的研究中,插值方法的灵敏度为85.5%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值为94.6%,阴性预测值为65.4%。这些结果低于博多夫斯基博士的结果。中掌反位感觉法的敏感性为95.1%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为98.3%,阴性预测值为86.4%,均高于插值法的结果。结果表明,内插法诊断轻度CTS具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,但其灵敏度和特异性均低于腕部和中掌部的抗皮肤刺激法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise. Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular. Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury. Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1