EMLA cream for carpal tunnel syndrome: how it compares with steroid injection.

A R Moghtaderi, S M Jazayeri, S Azizi
{"title":"EMLA cream for carpal tunnel syndrome: how it compares with steroid injection.","authors":"A R Moghtaderi,&nbsp;S M Jazayeri,&nbsp;S Azizi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A standard treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is local injection of anesthetic-corticosteroid. This clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of daily application of the EMLA cream (lidocaine 2.5% plus prilocaine 2.5%) with that of a single injection of methyl prednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol) 40 mg.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, parallel-group, open-label, single-center, case-controlled, prospective study, 65 participants (70 hands) aged 18-75 years with clinical & electrodiagnostic evidences of CTS were randomized to receive either the EMLA cream (n = 30 patients, 35 hands, group 1) or one injection of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg at wrist (n = 35 patients, group 2). Outcome assessments included the visual analog scale and clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks of treatment, patients in both groups reported significant changes (P < 0.001) in pain intensity. Both treatments were well tolerated, with treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported in 2 patients in group 1 (5.7%) and 10 patients in group 2 (28.5%) No systemic treatment-related AEs were observed with the EMLA cream.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMLA cream was effective in reducing pain associated with CTS and well tolerated and it may offer patients with CTS an effective, noninvasive symptomatic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"287-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A standard treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is local injection of anesthetic-corticosteroid. This clinical trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of daily application of the EMLA cream (lidocaine 2.5% plus prilocaine 2.5%) with that of a single injection of methyl prednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol) 40 mg.

Methods: In this randomized, parallel-group, open-label, single-center, case-controlled, prospective study, 65 participants (70 hands) aged 18-75 years with clinical & electrodiagnostic evidences of CTS were randomized to receive either the EMLA cream (n = 30 patients, 35 hands, group 1) or one injection of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg at wrist (n = 35 patients, group 2). Outcome assessments included the visual analog scale and clinical assessment.

Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, patients in both groups reported significant changes (P < 0.001) in pain intensity. Both treatments were well tolerated, with treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported in 2 patients in group 1 (5.7%) and 10 patients in group 2 (28.5%) No systemic treatment-related AEs were observed with the EMLA cream.

Conclusion: EMLA cream was effective in reducing pain associated with CTS and well tolerated and it may offer patients with CTS an effective, noninvasive symptomatic treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMLA乳膏治疗腕管综合征:与类固醇注射比较。
背景:腕管综合征(CTS)的标准治疗选择是局部注射麻醉皮质类固醇。本临床试验旨在比较每日应用EMLA乳膏(利多卡因2.5% +丙罗卡因2.5%)与单次注射醋酸甲泼尼龙(Depo-Medrol) 40 mg的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项随机、平行组、开放标签、单中心、病例对照、前瞻性研究中,65名年龄在18-75岁、有CTS临床和电诊断证据的参与者(70手)随机接受EMLA乳膏(n = 30例,35手,组1)或醋酸甲基强的松龙手腕注射40 mg (n = 35例,组2)。结果评估包括视觉模拟量表和临床评估。结果:治疗4周后,两组患者疼痛强度均有显著变化(P < 0.001)。两种治疗均耐受良好,1组2例(5.7%)和2组10例(28.5%)报告了治疗相关不良事件(ae)。EMLA乳膏未观察到与全身治疗相关的ae。结论:EMLA乳膏可有效减轻CTS患者的疼痛,且耐受性良好,可为CTS患者提供有效、无创的对症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise. Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular. Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury. Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1