Evaluating venepuncture practice on a general children's ward.

Christopher Hands, Jonathan Round, Jessica Thomas
{"title":"Evaluating venepuncture practice on a general children's ward.","authors":"Christopher Hands,&nbsp;Jonathan Round,&nbsp;Jessica Thomas","doi":"10.7748/paed2010.03.22.2.32.c7597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the training for, practice of, and effects of venepuncture in children on a general children's ward. To identify approaches that might reduce the adverse physical and psychological effects related to venepuncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaire survey of 51 parents, 39 children and 72 junior doctors following venepuncture in the children. Telephone survey of 25 paediatric senior house officers on venous access training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents and children assessed venepuncture as extremely distressing. Parents' assessments of the mean number of venepuncture attempts were markedly higher than those of the doctors surveyed. When carrying out venepuncture, doctors used therapeutic measures much less frequently than expected. Only seven of the 25 departments surveyed offered any training in venepuncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venepuncture is consistently one of the most distressing aspects of hospital admission for children. Much could be done to alleviate this, but trainir patchy and interventions shown to reduce distress are not uniformly used.</p>","PeriodicalId":79363,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric nursing","volume":"22 2","pages":"32-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7748/paed2010.03.22.2.32.c7597","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/paed2010.03.22.2.32.c7597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Aim: To assess the training for, practice of, and effects of venepuncture in children on a general children's ward. To identify approaches that might reduce the adverse physical and psychological effects related to venepuncture.

Methods: Questionnaire survey of 51 parents, 39 children and 72 junior doctors following venepuncture in the children. Telephone survey of 25 paediatric senior house officers on venous access training.

Results: Parents and children assessed venepuncture as extremely distressing. Parents' assessments of the mean number of venepuncture attempts were markedly higher than those of the doctors surveyed. When carrying out venepuncture, doctors used therapeutic measures much less frequently than expected. Only seven of the 25 departments surveyed offered any training in venepuncture.

Conclusion: Venepuncture is consistently one of the most distressing aspects of hospital admission for children. Much could be done to alleviate this, but trainir patchy and interventions shown to reduce distress are not uniformly used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估普通儿科病房静脉穿刺的实践。
目的:评价普通儿科静脉穿刺的训练、实践及效果。确定可能减少与静脉穿刺相关的不良生理和心理影响的方法。方法:对51名家长、39名患儿和72名初级医生进行问卷调查。25名儿科高级住院医师静脉通路培训情况的电话调查。结果:家长和孩子认为静脉穿刺非常痛苦。父母对平均静脉穿刺次数的评估明显高于接受调查的医生。在进行静脉穿刺时,医生使用治疗措施的频率远低于预期。在接受调查的25个部门中,只有7个部门提供创业培训。结论:静脉穿刺一直是儿童住院最痛苦的方面之一。可以做很多事情来缓解这种情况,但培训并不完整,而且表明可以减少痛苦的干预措施并没有统一使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Male circumcision. Nursing in a conflict zone: an experience in faith, pioneering and co-operation. The safe and sustainable few. Interactions between parents and staff of hospitalised children. Saying sorry: the legal implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1