Analysis of Classes Used in the Treatment of Depression by Physician-reported Severity.

Susan Lenderts, Amir H Kalali, Richard Weisler
{"title":"Analysis of Classes Used in the Treatment of Depression by Physician-reported Severity.","authors":"Susan Lenderts,&nbsp;Amir H Kalali,&nbsp;Richard Weisler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed use of therapeutic drug classes for the treatment of depression by the three levels of physician-reported disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) to understand if the mix of therapeutic classes used to treat depression changes as disease severity increases. Prior to analyzing drug uses in each severity category, we established that in the 12 months ending November 2009, the majority of patients (65%) were assigned a severity rating of 'moderate' by their physician; 27 percent and eight percent of patients were designated as 'mild' and 'severe,' respectively. In general, we found that as disease severity changes, so too do the proportions of the various therapeutic classes used in depression. The differences in class mix by severity have persisted at least since the 12 months ending December 2008, and it appears that the mix of drug classes used in severe depression are becoming less similar to the class mix for moderate depression over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20822,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2848467/pdf/PE_7_2_17.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed use of therapeutic drug classes for the treatment of depression by the three levels of physician-reported disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) to understand if the mix of therapeutic classes used to treat depression changes as disease severity increases. Prior to analyzing drug uses in each severity category, we established that in the 12 months ending November 2009, the majority of patients (65%) were assigned a severity rating of 'moderate' by their physician; 27 percent and eight percent of patients were designated as 'mild' and 'severe,' respectively. In general, we found that as disease severity changes, so too do the proportions of the various therapeutic classes used in depression. The differences in class mix by severity have persisted at least since the 12 months ending December 2008, and it appears that the mix of drug classes used in severe depression are becoming less similar to the class mix for moderate depression over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生报告抑郁症严重程度的分类分析。
我们根据医生报告的疾病严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)的三个级别分析了治疗抑郁症的治疗药物类别的使用情况,以了解用于治疗抑郁症的治疗类别的组合是否随着疾病严重程度的增加而改变。在分析每个严重程度类别的药物使用情况之前,我们确定,在截至2009年11月的12个月中,大多数患者(65%)被医生分配了“中度”的严重程度等级;分别有27%和8%的患者被定为“轻度”和“重度”。总的来说,我们发现,随着疾病严重程度的变化,抑郁症中使用的各种治疗类别的比例也在变化。至少从截至2008年12月的12个月以来,严重程度类别组合的差异一直存在,而且随着时间的推移,用于重度抑郁症的药物类别组合似乎与用于中度抑郁症的药物类别组合越来越不相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meow meow or miaow miaow: a new drug of concern. Medical disability and pain medication prescription among internal medicine outpatients. A review of new atypical antipsychotic launches in the United States. Psychiatric disorders: a global look at facts and figures. The blood brain barrier and the role of ratiometric molecular analysis in schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1