Biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and progression: Beyond prostate-specific antigen.

Daniel M Berney
{"title":"Biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and progression: Beyond prostate-specific antigen.","authors":"Daniel M Berney","doi":"10.1358/dnp.2010.23.3.1437708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer is a major health problem with an incompletely understood pathogenesis and etiology. The advent of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the 1980s caused a revolution in how the disease was detected, but the evidence for PSA as a screening test is deficient. Biomarkers have been investigated, both for detection and discrimination of indolent from aggressive cancers. Refinements to the PSA test have been proposed but for practical and evidence-based reasons none have translated through to widespread clinical use. Of the novel biomarkers, the most promising is the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) test. New biomarkers to predict aggressive disease are even more contentious. The pathological grade of tumor remains the most powerful biomarker of prognosis. Other proven variables include tumor extent on biopsy and serum PSA. Tissue biomarkers have proven unhelpful due to a variable and biased literature with multiple methodological flaws, but Ki-67 probably shows more promise than any other current tissue biomarker. The recent discovery of a family of fusion genes in the prostate has led to considerable discussion on their prognostic role. Dissection of the genetic basis of the disease may lead to discoveries that will enhance our understanding and aid the search for prognostically valuable biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11325,"journal":{"name":"Drug news & perspectives","volume":"23 3","pages":"185-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug news & perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/dnp.2010.23.3.1437708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major health problem with an incompletely understood pathogenesis and etiology. The advent of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the 1980s caused a revolution in how the disease was detected, but the evidence for PSA as a screening test is deficient. Biomarkers have been investigated, both for detection and discrimination of indolent from aggressive cancers. Refinements to the PSA test have been proposed but for practical and evidence-based reasons none have translated through to widespread clinical use. Of the novel biomarkers, the most promising is the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) test. New biomarkers to predict aggressive disease are even more contentious. The pathological grade of tumor remains the most powerful biomarker of prognosis. Other proven variables include tumor extent on biopsy and serum PSA. Tissue biomarkers have proven unhelpful due to a variable and biased literature with multiple methodological flaws, but Ki-67 probably shows more promise than any other current tissue biomarker. The recent discovery of a family of fusion genes in the prostate has led to considerable discussion on their prognostic role. Dissection of the genetic basis of the disease may lead to discoveries that will enhance our understanding and aid the search for prognostically valuable biomarkers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌检测和进展的生物标志物:超越前列腺特异性抗原。
前列腺癌是一个主要的健康问题,其发病机制和病因尚不完全清楚。20世纪80年代,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的出现引发了一场疾病检测方式的革命,但PSA作为筛查测试的证据不足。已经研究了生物标志物,用于检测和区分惰性和侵袭性癌症。已经提出了PSA测试的改进方案,但由于实际和基于证据的原因,没有一项能够转化为广泛的临床应用。在新的生物标志物中,最有希望的是前列腺癌抗原3 (PCA3)检测。预测侵袭性疾病的新生物标志物甚至更有争议。肿瘤的病理分级仍然是预后最有力的生物标志物。其他已证实的变量包括活检的肿瘤范围和血清PSA。组织生物标志物已被证明是无用的,因为有多种方法缺陷的可变和有偏见的文献,但Ki-67可能比任何其他当前的组织生物标志物更有希望。最近在前列腺中发现的一个融合基因家族引起了对其预后作用的大量讨论。解剖疾病的遗传基础可能会导致发现,这将增强我们的理解,并有助于寻找预后有价值的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug news & perspectives
Drug news & perspectives 医学-药学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Osteopontin. Trends in medicinal chemistry. Molecule of the Month. The significance of GlgE as a new target for tuberculosis. Inhibition of potassium currents as a pharmacologic target for investigation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1