Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Trends in Amplification Pub Date : 2010-03-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-10 DOI:10.1177/1084713810362988
Earl E Johnson, Todd A Ricketts
{"title":"Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.","authors":"Earl E Johnson,&nbsp;Todd A Ricketts","doi":"10.1177/1084713810362988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to develop and examine a list of potential variables that may account for variability in the dispensing rates of four common hearing aid features. A total of 29 potential variables were identified and placed into the following categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's patient population, and (4) evidence-based practice grades of recommendation for each feature. The potentially associative variables then were examined using regression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey. There was a direct relation between price and level of hearing aid technology with the frequency of dispensing product features. There was also a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and the frequency of dispensing that feature. In general, the results suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongly to dispensing rates of product features than to differences in characteristics of the patient population served by audiologists. An additional finding indicated that evidence-based practice recommendations were inversely related to dispensing rates of product features. This finding, however, may not be the result of dispensing trends as much as hearing aid manufacturing trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":48972,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Amplification","volume":"14 1","pages":"12-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1084713810362988","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Amplification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713810362988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop and examine a list of potential variables that may account for variability in the dispensing rates of four common hearing aid features. A total of 29 potential variables were identified and placed into the following categories: (1) characteristics of the audiologist, (2) characteristics of the hearing aids dispensed by the audiologist, (3) characteristics of the audiologist's patient population, and (4) evidence-based practice grades of recommendation for each feature. The potentially associative variables then were examined using regression analyses from the responses of 257 audiologists to a dispensing practice survey. There was a direct relation between price and level of hearing aid technology with the frequency of dispensing product features. There was also a direct relation between the belief by the audiologist that a feature might benefit patients and the frequency of dispensing that feature. In general, the results suggested that personal differences among audiologists and the hearing aids audiologists choose to dispense are related more strongly to dispensing rates of product features than to differences in characteristics of the patient population served by audiologists. An additional finding indicated that evidence-based practice recommendations were inversely related to dispensing rates of product features. This finding, however, may not be the result of dispensing trends as much as hearing aid manufacturing trends.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种常见助听器产品特征的配药率:与听力学家实践变化的关联。
该研究的目的是开发和检查一个潜在的变量列表,这些变量可能会解释四种常见助听器功能配药率的变化。总共确定了29个潜在变量,并将其分为以下类别:(1)听力学家的特征,(2)听力学家配发的助听器的特征,(3)听力学家的患者群体特征,以及(4)每个特征的循证实践推荐等级。然后使用回归分析从257听力学家对配药实践调查的反应来检查潜在的关联变量。助听器技术的价格和水平与配药产品特征的频率有直接关系。听力学家认为某种特征可能对患者有益的信念与分配该特征的频率之间也存在直接关系。总的来说,结果表明听力学家和助听器选择配发的听力学家之间的个人差异与产品功能的配发率的关系比听力学家所服务的患者群体特征的差异更强。另一项发现表明,循证实践建议与产品功能的分配率呈负相关。然而,这一发现可能不是配药趋势的结果,而是助听器制造趋势的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Amplification
Trends in Amplification AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. The master hearing aid. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1