Comparative effectiveness. Federal government's push for more data to benefit supply chain.

Materials management in health care Pub Date : 2010-04-01
Geri Aston
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness. Federal government's push for more data to benefit supply chain.","authors":"Geri Aston","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided $1.1 billion to help fund comparative effectiveness research. Some of this money will be used to fund studies that will examine the effectiveness between drugs, medical devices and/or procedures for the same condition. The findings from this research may eventually provide materials managers with information on how products such as knee, hip and spinal implants perform. What follows is a look at the comparative effectiveness movement and what it may mean to the health care supply chain.</p>","PeriodicalId":79683,"journal":{"name":"Materials management in health care","volume":"19 4","pages":"22-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials management in health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 provided $1.1 billion to help fund comparative effectiveness research. Some of this money will be used to fund studies that will examine the effectiveness between drugs, medical devices and/or procedures for the same condition. The findings from this research may eventually provide materials managers with information on how products such as knee, hip and spinal implants perform. What follows is a look at the comparative effectiveness movement and what it may mean to the health care supply chain.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较效率。联邦政府推动更多数据以使供应链受益。
2009年的《美国复苏与再投资法案》提供了11亿美元用于资助比较有效性研究。其中一部分资金将用于资助研究,以检查药物、医疗设备和/或程序对同一病症的有效性。这项研究的结果可能最终为材料管理人员提供有关膝关节、髋关节和脊柱植入物等产品性能的信息。以下是比较有效性运动及其对医疗保健供应链的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Head Games Money Isn’t Everything Gains to be made. Research shows gainsharing programs can spur savings. Interview by Jeff Ferenc. Biggest winners. Optimizing group purchasing relationships. Optimizing medical device buying. Value analysis models can help you improve decision-making process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1