Hyaluronan binding assay (HBA) vs. sperm penetration assay (SPA): Can HBA replace the SPA test in male partner screening before in vitro fertilization?

Jelena Lazarevic, Maria Wikarczuk, Stephen G Somkuti, Larry I Barmat, Jay S Schinfeld, Scott E Smith
{"title":"Hyaluronan binding assay (HBA) vs. sperm penetration assay (SPA): Can HBA replace the SPA test in male partner screening before in vitro fertilization?","authors":"Jelena Lazarevic,&nbsp;Maria Wikarczuk,&nbsp;Stephen G Somkuti,&nbsp;Larry I Barmat,&nbsp;Jay S Schinfeld,&nbsp;Scott E Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if a less expensive, easier, and faster to perform HBA test is clinically equal to the more complicated, technically challenging and expensive SPA test as a reliable indicator of sperm fertilizing capacity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Andrology laboratory within In Vitro Fertilization Program.</p><p><strong>Patient(s): </strong>Semen samples from 26 infertility couples were analyzed. Both, normal and male factor patients were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Male partner screening with the HBA and the SPA tests.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Relationship between HBA and SPA test results.</p><p><strong>Result(s): </strong>The data obtained in this study showed no statistically significant relationship between the HBA and SPA results. The mean HBA scores 76.3%, 61.3% and 76.8% were statistically not significantly different as compared to patients with negative (<5), grey zone (5-8) and for positive (>8) sperm capacitation index values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>The HBA is not predictive of the results of the SPA. Therefore, HBA test does not reduce the need for and cannot replace the SPA test in male partner screening prior to infertility treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":87102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","volume":"7 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2868308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a less expensive, easier, and faster to perform HBA test is clinically equal to the more complicated, technically challenging and expensive SPA test as a reliable indicator of sperm fertilizing capacity.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Andrology laboratory within In Vitro Fertilization Program.

Patient(s): Semen samples from 26 infertility couples were analyzed. Both, normal and male factor patients were included.

Intervention(s): Male partner screening with the HBA and the SPA tests.

Main outcome measure(s): Relationship between HBA and SPA test results.

Result(s): The data obtained in this study showed no statistically significant relationship between the HBA and SPA results. The mean HBA scores 76.3%, 61.3% and 76.8% were statistically not significantly different as compared to patients with negative (<5), grey zone (5-8) and for positive (>8) sperm capacitation index values.

Conclusion(s): The HBA is not predictive of the results of the SPA. Therefore, HBA test does not reduce the need for and cannot replace the SPA test in male partner screening prior to infertility treatment.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透明质酸结合试验(HBA)与精子穿透试验(SPA): HBA能否取代SPA试验用于体外受精前的男性伴侣筛选?
目的:确定一种更便宜、更容易、更快速的HBA试验在临床上是否与更复杂、技术上具有挑战性和昂贵的SPA试验等同,作为精子受精能力的可靠指标。设计:前瞻性研究。地点:体外受精项目男科实验室。患者:分析了26对不育夫妇的精液样本。包括正常和男性因素患者。干预措施:用HBA和SPA测试筛查男性伴侣。主要结果测量:HBA和SPA测试结果的关系结果:本研究获得的数据显示HBA和SPA结果之间无统计学意义的关系。与精子获能指数为阴性的患者相比,HBA评分的平均值分别为76.3%、61.3%和76.8%,差异无统计学意义。结论:HBA评分不能预测SPA结果。因此,在不育治疗前的男性伴侣筛查中,HBA测试不能减少对SPA测试的需求,也不能取代SPA测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Male subfertility and the role of micronutrient supplementation: clinical and economic issues. Prediction of individual probabilities of livebirth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counselling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. Folic acid and human reproduction-ten important issues for clinicians. A population based economic analysis of cross-border payments for fertility services in Luxembourg. Comparison of selected cryoprotective agents to stabilize meiotic spindles of human oocytes during cooling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1