Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions.

Eldad Vizel, Mordechai Yigla, Yulia Goryachev, Eyal Dekel, Vered Felis, Hanna Levi, Isaac Kroin, Simon Godfrey, Noam Gavriely
{"title":"Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions.","authors":"Eldad Vizel,&nbsp;Mordechai Yigla,&nbsp;Yulia Goryachev,&nbsp;Eyal Dekel,&nbsp;Vered Felis,&nbsp;Hanna Levi,&nbsp;Isaac Kroin,&nbsp;Simon Godfrey,&nbsp;Noam Gavriely","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-6-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tracheal and chest wall sounds, ambient sounds and chest motion were digitally recorded, using the PulmoTrack(R) hardware, from healthy volunteers coughing voluntarily while (a) laying supine, (b) sitting, (c) sitting with strong ambient noise, (d) walking, and (e) climbing stairs, a total of 25 minutes per subject. The cough monitoring algorithm was applied to the recorded data to detect and count coughs.The detection algorithm first searches for cough 'candidates' by identifying loud sounds with a cough pattern, followed by a secondary verification process based on detection of specific characteristics of cough. The recorded data were independently and blindly evaluated by trained experts who listened to the sounds and visually reviewed them on a sonogram display.The validation process was based on two methods: (i) Referring to an expert consensus as gold standard, and comparing each cough detected by the algorithm to the expert marking, we marked True and False, positive and negative detections.These values were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the cough monitoring system. (ii) Counting the number of coughs in longer segments (t = 60 sec, n = 300) and plotting the cough count vs. the corresponding experts' count whereby the linear regression equation, the regression coefficient (R2) and the joint-distribution density Bland-Altman plots could be determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were recorded from 12 volunteers undergoing the complete protocol. The overall Specificity for cough events was 94% and the Sensitivity was 96%, with similar values found for all conditions, except for the stair climbing stage where the Specificity was 87% with Sensitivity of 97%. The regression equation between the PulmoTrack-CC cough event counts and the Experts' determination was with R2 of 0.94.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This validation scheme provides an objective and quantitative assessment method of a cough counting algorithm in a range of realistic situations that simulate ambulatory monitoring of cough. The ability to detect voluntary coughs under acoustically challenging ambient conditions may represent a useful step towards a clinically applicable automatic cough detector.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"6 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-6-3","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-6-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Background: While cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel).

Methods: Tracheal and chest wall sounds, ambient sounds and chest motion were digitally recorded, using the PulmoTrack(R) hardware, from healthy volunteers coughing voluntarily while (a) laying supine, (b) sitting, (c) sitting with strong ambient noise, (d) walking, and (e) climbing stairs, a total of 25 minutes per subject. The cough monitoring algorithm was applied to the recorded data to detect and count coughs.The detection algorithm first searches for cough 'candidates' by identifying loud sounds with a cough pattern, followed by a secondary verification process based on detection of specific characteristics of cough. The recorded data were independently and blindly evaluated by trained experts who listened to the sounds and visually reviewed them on a sonogram display.The validation process was based on two methods: (i) Referring to an expert consensus as gold standard, and comparing each cough detected by the algorithm to the expert marking, we marked True and False, positive and negative detections.These values were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the cough monitoring system. (ii) Counting the number of coughs in longer segments (t = 60 sec, n = 300) and plotting the cough count vs. the corresponding experts' count whereby the linear regression equation, the regression coefficient (R2) and the joint-distribution density Bland-Altman plots could be determined.

Results: Data were recorded from 12 volunteers undergoing the complete protocol. The overall Specificity for cough events was 94% and the Sensitivity was 96%, with similar values found for all conditions, except for the stair climbing stage where the Specificity was 87% with Sensitivity of 97%. The regression equation between the PulmoTrack-CC cough event counts and the Experts' determination was with R2 of 0.94.

Discussion: This validation scheme provides an objective and quantitative assessment method of a cough counting algorithm in a range of realistic situations that simulate ambulatory monitoring of cough. The ability to detect voluntary coughs under acoustically challenging ambient conditions may represent a useful step towards a clinically applicable automatic cough detector.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同条件下使用自愿咳嗽的动态咳嗽检测和计数应用程序的验证。
背景:虽然咳嗽是呼吸系统的重要防御机制,但其慢性存在是令人烦恼的,可能表明存在严重疾病。我们在此描述一种新型咳嗽检测和计数技术的验证过程(PulmoTrack-CC, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel)。方法:使用PulmoTrack(R)硬件,对健康志愿者在(a)仰卧、(b)坐着、(c)在强环境噪声下坐着、(d)行走和(e)爬楼梯时自愿咳嗽的气管和胸壁声音、环境声音和胸部运动进行数字记录,每名受试者共25分钟。应用咳嗽监测算法对记录数据进行咳嗽检测和计数。检测算法首先通过识别具有咳嗽模式的大声声音来搜索咳嗽“候选”,然后基于检测咳嗽的特定特征进行二次验证过程。记录的数据由训练有素的专家独立和盲目地进行评估,他们听取声音,并在超声图显示器上进行视觉审查。验证过程基于两种方法:(i)以专家共识为金标准,将算法检测到的每个咳嗽与专家标记进行比较,我们标记了True和False,阳性和阴性检测。这些值用于评价咳嗽监测系统的特异性和敏感性。(ii)统计较长时间段(t = 60秒,n = 300)的咳嗽次数,绘制咳嗽次数与相应专家的咳嗽次数对比图,从而确定线性回归方程、回归系数(R2)和联合分布密度Bland-Altman图。结果:记录了12名接受完整方案的志愿者的数据。咳嗽事件的总体特异性为94%,敏感性为96%,除爬楼梯阶段特异性为87%,敏感性为97%外,所有条件的值都相似。PulmoTrack-CC咳嗽事件计数与专家判定的回归方程R2为0.94。讨论:该验证方案在模拟咳嗽动态监测的一系列现实情况下,为咳嗽计数算法提供了一种客观定量的评估方法。在具有声学挑战性的环境条件下检测自主咳嗽的能力可能代表着朝着临床适用的自动咳嗽检测器迈出的有用一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A crossover randomized comparative study of zofenopril and ramipril on cough reflex and airway inflammation in healthy volunteers. Standardized method for solubility and storage of capsaicin-based solutions for cough induction. On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: an international qualitative study. Effect of acid suppression therapy on gastroesophageal reflux and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an intervention study. Severity of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with MUC5 B genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1