The differential effects of core stabilization exercise regime and conventional physiotherapy regime on postural control parameters during perturbation in patients with movement and control impairment chronic low back pain.

Ramprasad Muthukrishnan, Shweta D Shenoy, Sandhu S Jaspal, Shankara Nellikunja, Svetlana Fernandes
{"title":"The differential effects of core stabilization exercise regime and conventional physiotherapy regime on postural control parameters during perturbation in patients with movement and control impairment chronic low back pain.","authors":"Ramprasad Muthukrishnan,&nbsp;Shweta D Shenoy,&nbsp;Sandhu S Jaspal,&nbsp;Shankara Nellikunja,&nbsp;Svetlana Fernandes","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-2-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to examine the differential effect of core stability exercise training and conventional physiotherapy regime on altered postural control parameters in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). As heterogeneity in CLBP population moderates the effect of intervention on outcomes, in this study, interventions approaches were used based on sub-groups of CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an allocation concealed, blinded, sequential and pragmatic control trial. Three groups of participants were investigated during postural perturbations: 1) CLBP patients with movement impairment (n = 15, MI group) randomized to conventional physiotherapy regime 2) fifteen CLBP patients with control impairment randomized to core stability group (CI group) and 3) fifteen healthy controls (HC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MI group did not show any significant changes in postural control parameters after the intervention period however they improved significantly in disability scores and fear avoidance belief questionnaire work score (P < 0.05). The CI group showed significant improvements in Fx, Fz, and My variables (p < 0.013, p < 0.006, and p < 0.002 respectively with larger effect sizes: Hedges's g > 0.8) after 8 weeks of core stability exercises for the adjusted p values. Postural control parameters of HC group were analyzed independently with pre and post postural control parameters of CI and MI group. This revealed the significant improvements in postural control parameters in CI group compared to MI group indicating the specific adaptation to the core stability exercises in CI group. Though the disability scores were reduced significantly in CI and MI groups (p < 0.001), the post intervention scores between groups were not found significant (p < 0.288). Twenty percentage absolute risk reduction in flare-up rates during intervention was found in CI group (95% CI: 0.69-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study core stability exercise group demonstrated significant improvements after intervention in ground reaction forces (Fz, Mz; g > 0.8) indicating changes in load transfer patterns during perturbation similar to HC group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UTRN095032158-06012009423714.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"2 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-2-13","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-2-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to examine the differential effect of core stability exercise training and conventional physiotherapy regime on altered postural control parameters in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). As heterogeneity in CLBP population moderates the effect of intervention on outcomes, in this study, interventions approaches were used based on sub-groups of CLBP.

Methods: This was an allocation concealed, blinded, sequential and pragmatic control trial. Three groups of participants were investigated during postural perturbations: 1) CLBP patients with movement impairment (n = 15, MI group) randomized to conventional physiotherapy regime 2) fifteen CLBP patients with control impairment randomized to core stability group (CI group) and 3) fifteen healthy controls (HC).

Results: The MI group did not show any significant changes in postural control parameters after the intervention period however they improved significantly in disability scores and fear avoidance belief questionnaire work score (P < 0.05). The CI group showed significant improvements in Fx, Fz, and My variables (p < 0.013, p < 0.006, and p < 0.002 respectively with larger effect sizes: Hedges's g > 0.8) after 8 weeks of core stability exercises for the adjusted p values. Postural control parameters of HC group were analyzed independently with pre and post postural control parameters of CI and MI group. This revealed the significant improvements in postural control parameters in CI group compared to MI group indicating the specific adaptation to the core stability exercises in CI group. Though the disability scores were reduced significantly in CI and MI groups (p < 0.001), the post intervention scores between groups were not found significant (p < 0.288). Twenty percentage absolute risk reduction in flare-up rates during intervention was found in CI group (95% CI: 0.69-0.98).

Conclusions: In this study core stability exercise group demonstrated significant improvements after intervention in ground reaction forces (Fz, Mz; g > 0.8) indicating changes in load transfer patterns during perturbation similar to HC group.

Trial registration: UTRN095032158-06012009423714.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心稳定运动方案和常规物理治疗方案对运动和控制障碍慢性腰痛患者摄动期间姿势控制参数的差异影响。
背景:本研究的目的是研究核心稳定性运动训练和常规物理治疗方案对慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者姿势控制参数改变的不同影响。由于CLBP人群的异质性调节了干预对结果的影响,因此在本研究中,采用了基于CLBP亚组的干预方法。方法:采用分组隐蔽、盲法、顺序、实用对照试验。研究对象分为三组:1)有运动障碍的CLBP患者(MI组15例)随机分配到常规物理治疗方案;2)有对照障碍的CLBP患者15例随机分配到核心稳定组(CI组);3)健康对照(HC) 15例。结果:MI组干预期后体位控制参数无明显变化,但失能得分和恐惧回避信念问卷工作得分均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。CI组在8周的核心稳定性练习后,对调整后的p值显示Fx、Fz和My变量(p < 0.013、p < 0.006和p < 0.002分别具有较大的效应量:Hedges的g > 0.8)有显著改善。HC组的体位控制参数与CI、MI组的前后体位控制参数进行独立分析。这表明CI组与MI组相比,姿态控制参数有显著改善,表明CI组对核心稳定性训练的特异性适应。CI组和MI组的失能评分显著降低(p < 0.001),但干预后组间评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.288)。CI组在干预期间爆发率的绝对风险降低了20% (95% CI: 0.69-0.98)。结论:在本研究中,核心稳定性锻炼组在地面反作用力(Fz, Mz;g > 0.8),表明扰动期间负荷传递模式的变化与HC组相似。试验注册:UTRN095032158-06012009423714。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment of stress fracture of the olecranon in throwing athletes with internal fixation through a small incision. Management of degenerative rotator cuff tears: a review and treatment strategy. A variant of a type V lateral clavicle fracture involving a posteriorly displaced medial segment. A case report. Contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case controlled study. Coordinative variability and overuse injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1