[The dilemma of diabetes in pregnancy: worldwide differences in diagnosis and management].

Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau Pub Date : 2009-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-19 DOI:10.1159/000301086
W Zeck, D Schlembach, T Panzitt, U Lang, H D McIntyre
{"title":"[The dilemma of diabetes in pregnancy: worldwide differences in diagnosis and management].","authors":"W Zeck,&nbsp;D Schlembach,&nbsp;T Panzitt,&nbsp;U Lang,&nbsp;H D McIntyre","doi":"10.1159/000301086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy as well as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pose major risks to mother and fetus. We assessed to which extent two obstetric centers on two different continents coincide in their management of diabetes in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the scope of research activities between the Obstetric Department of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and the Centre of Obstetric Medicine at the Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia, current practices among the two obstetric centers in Austria and Australia were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy was almost identical, whereas major differences were found in the management of GDM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardization of screening methods in diabetes in pregnancy remains challenging. National and international consensus has yet to be achieved in order to put a hold to the 'diabetic epidemic' we are going to face in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12827,"journal":{"name":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","volume":"49 4","pages":"267-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000301086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000301086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy as well as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pose major risks to mother and fetus. We assessed to which extent two obstetric centers on two different continents coincide in their management of diabetes in pregnancy.

Methods: Within the scope of research activities between the Obstetric Department of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and the Centre of Obstetric Medicine at the Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital in Brisbane, Australia, current practices among the two obstetric centers in Austria and Australia were assessed.

Results: The management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy was almost identical, whereas major differences were found in the management of GDM.

Conclusion: Standardization of screening methods in diabetes in pregnancy remains challenging. National and international consensus has yet to be achieved in order to put a hold to the 'diabetic epidemic' we are going to face in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[妊娠期糖尿病的困境:世界范围内诊断和治疗的差异]。
目的:妊娠期1型和2型糖尿病以及妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)对母亲和胎儿的危害较大。我们评估了在多大程度上两个产科中心在两个不同的大陆在其妊娠糖尿病的管理一致。方法:在奥地利格拉茨医科大学产科科和澳大利亚布里斯班圣母医院产科医学中心的研究活动范围内,对奥地利和澳大利亚两个产科中心的现行做法进行了评估。结果:妊娠期1型和2型糖尿病的管理几乎相同,而妊娠期GDM的管理存在重大差异。结论:标准化妊娠期糖尿病筛查方法仍具有挑战性。为了控制我们未来将面临的“糖尿病流行”,国内和国际共识尚未达成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Intrauterine programming of specific organ systems]. [Intrauterine programming of reproductive function--a valid concept?]. [Intrauterine growth restriction and renal function--a long-term problem?]. [Intrauterine programming of disorders of brain function in later life]. [External cephalic version in cases of breech presentation: renaissance of a well-known procedure?].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1