The mechanical properties of endovascular stents: an in vitro assessment.

Clifton R Johnston, Kogan Lee, Jacqueline Flewitt, Randy Moore, Gary M Dobson, Gail M Thornton
{"title":"The mechanical properties of endovascular stents: an in vitro assessment.","authors":"Clifton R Johnston,&nbsp;Kogan Lee,&nbsp;Jacqueline Flewitt,&nbsp;Randy Moore,&nbsp;Gary M Dobson,&nbsp;Gail M Thornton","doi":"10.1007/s10558-010-9097-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular stents are commonly used to manage arterial diseases such as Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm (AAA), aortic dissection and coarctation. The radial force the stent applies to the vessel must be large enough to resist stent migration, but not so large that the mechanical stimulus initiates adverse vessel remodeling. We employed two approaches to characterize the radial force of Gianturco stents: first, by applying an external pressure to the stent and, second, by measuring the force exerted by the stent when deployed. From the second approach, we determined the force exerted at various area reductions that correspond to clinically relevant diameter oversizings. In this study, stent stiffness was determined from the force-area reduction curves. Comparing similar stents of various diameters revealed that smaller diameter stent had greater radial force and stiffness than larger diameter stents. Comparing similar stents of various lengths revealed that stents with longer lengths (and greater number of wires) has greater force and stiffness. Overlapping two stents increased the force and stiffness to values greater than the sum of those parameters for the individual stents. These data may have important clinical implications for understanding the effect of oversized and overlapped stents on vessel mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":"10 3","pages":"128-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-010-9097-9","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-010-9097-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Endovascular stents are commonly used to manage arterial diseases such as Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm (AAA), aortic dissection and coarctation. The radial force the stent applies to the vessel must be large enough to resist stent migration, but not so large that the mechanical stimulus initiates adverse vessel remodeling. We employed two approaches to characterize the radial force of Gianturco stents: first, by applying an external pressure to the stent and, second, by measuring the force exerted by the stent when deployed. From the second approach, we determined the force exerted at various area reductions that correspond to clinically relevant diameter oversizings. In this study, stent stiffness was determined from the force-area reduction curves. Comparing similar stents of various diameters revealed that smaller diameter stent had greater radial force and stiffness than larger diameter stents. Comparing similar stents of various lengths revealed that stents with longer lengths (and greater number of wires) has greater force and stiffness. Overlapping two stents increased the force and stiffness to values greater than the sum of those parameters for the individual stents. These data may have important clinical implications for understanding the effect of oversized and overlapped stents on vessel mechanics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内支架的机械性能:体外评估。
血管内支架通常用于治疗动脉疾病,如腹主动脉瘤(AAA)、主动脉夹层和主动脉缩窄。支架对血管施加的径向力必须足够大,以抵抗支架的迁移,但又不能太大,以免机械刺激引发不利的血管重塑。我们采用了两种方法来表征Gianturco支架的径向力:第一,通过对支架施加外部压力,第二,通过测量支架部署时施加的力。从第二种方法中,我们确定了施加在不同面积缩小处的力,这些缩小与临床相关的直径过大相对应。在本研究中,支架刚度由力-面积减小曲线确定。比较不同直径的类似支架,发现直径较小的支架比直径较大的支架具有更大的径向力和刚度。比较不同长度的类似支架,发现长度越长(钢丝数量越多)的支架受力和刚度越大。重叠两个支架增加的力和刚度值大于单个支架的这些参数的总和。这些数据可能对理解超大和重叠支架对血管力学的影响具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Bioprinting of a Tissue Engineered Human Heart Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 2: From Fabrication to Optimization Square Root Design for Natural Frequency Module of Dynamic ECG Features—a Preliminary Study Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 1: From Conception to Materials Selection Biopolymers as Potential Carrier for Effervescent Reaction Based Drug Delivery System in Gastrointestinal Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1