Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary?

Hirokuni Yamazawa
{"title":"Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary?","authors":"Hirokuni Yamazawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Doppler echocardiography derived peak instantaneous systolic pressure gradient (peak instantaneous Doppler PG), the mean PG (mean Doppler PG) and the aortic valvular area are the accepted standard for determining the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention because of good agreement between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs in adult patients with aortic valvular stenosis. However, several investigators reported that pressure recovery can cause discrepancies between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs, so that the correction for pressure recovery has been proposed. In pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis, the discrepancy between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs and the correction for pressure recovery have not been studied well. Therefore, the purpose of current study was to clarify the role of echocardiography for estimating the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention and to assess the influence of pressure recovery on the Doppler-derived PG in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis. Thirteen pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis were studied with echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. PG determined by the catheterization was compared with PG determined by the echocardiography with linear regression and Bland and Altman analysis. As result, Doppler-derived PGs corrected for pressure recovery did not correlated well with catheter-measured PGs. By contrast, Doppler-derived PGs correlated well with catheter-measured PGs. In particular, the mean Doppler PG correlated excellently with the mean catheter PG. In conclusion, the mean Doppler PG demonstrated an excellent correlation with the mean catheter PG without the correction for pressure recovery. Thus, the mean Doppler PG is useful in order to determine the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6338,"journal":{"name":"[Hokkaido igaku zasshi] The Hokkaido journal of medical science","volume":"85 4","pages":"225-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Hokkaido igaku zasshi] The Hokkaido journal of medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Doppler echocardiography derived peak instantaneous systolic pressure gradient (peak instantaneous Doppler PG), the mean PG (mean Doppler PG) and the aortic valvular area are the accepted standard for determining the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention because of good agreement between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs in adult patients with aortic valvular stenosis. However, several investigators reported that pressure recovery can cause discrepancies between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs, so that the correction for pressure recovery has been proposed. In pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis, the discrepancy between Doppler-derived and catheter-measured PGs and the correction for pressure recovery have not been studied well. Therefore, the purpose of current study was to clarify the role of echocardiography for estimating the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention and to assess the influence of pressure recovery on the Doppler-derived PG in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis. Thirteen pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis were studied with echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. PG determined by the catheterization was compared with PG determined by the echocardiography with linear regression and Bland and Altman analysis. As result, Doppler-derived PGs corrected for pressure recovery did not correlated well with catheter-measured PGs. By contrast, Doppler-derived PGs correlated well with catheter-measured PGs. In particular, the mean Doppler PG correlated excellently with the mean catheter PG. In conclusion, the mean Doppler PG demonstrated an excellent correlation with the mean catheter PG without the correction for pressure recovery. Thus, the mean Doppler PG is useful in order to determine the prognosis and optimal timing of intervention in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多普勒压力梯度在儿童主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的准确性:是否有必要对压力恢复进行校正?
多普勒超声心动图得出的瞬时收缩压梯度峰值(瞬时多普勒PG峰值)、平均PG(平均多普勒PG平均值)和主动脉瓣面积是确定成年主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后和最佳干预时机的公认标准,因为多普勒超声心动图得出的瞬时收缩压梯度峰值与导管测量的肺动脉瓣面积吻合良好。然而,一些研究人员报道,压力恢复可能导致多普勒推导的pg和导管测量的pg之间的差异,因此已经提出了压力恢复的校正。在患有主动脉瓣狭窄的儿童患者中,多普勒测量和导管测量的PGs之间的差异以及压力恢复的纠正尚未得到很好的研究。因此,本研究的目的是明确超声心动图在估计主动脉瓣狭窄儿童患者预后和最佳干预时机中的作用,并评估压力恢复对多普勒衍生PG的影响。对13例小儿主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行超声心动图和心导管检查。将导管测得的PG与超声心动图测得的PG进行线性回归及Bland和Altman分析比较。结果,校正压力恢复的多普勒衍生的气压计与导管测量的气压计没有很好的相关性。相比之下,多普勒衍生的pg与导管测量的pg相关性良好。特别是,平均多普勒PG与平均导管PG具有良好的相关性。综上所述,平均多普勒PG与未经压力恢复校正的平均导管PG具有良好的相关性。因此,平均多普勒PG对于确定儿童主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后和最佳干预时机是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Kouichi Terazawa (1952-2015)]. [AMED: Missions and Challenges]. [Current understanding of the mechanism of undesirable transfusion reaction and the preventive strategires against them]. [Clinical significance of awake neurosurgery]. [Lifestyle and health: results from epidemiological studies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1