A clinical, MRI, and EMG analysis comparing the efficacy of twin blocks and flat occlusal splints in the management of disc displacements with reduction.

World journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Neeraj S Rohida, Wasundhara Bhad
{"title":"A clinical, MRI, and EMG analysis comparing the efficacy of twin blocks and flat occlusal splints in the management of disc displacements with reduction.","authors":"Neeraj S Rohida,&nbsp;Wasundhara Bhad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is characterized by an abnormal disc-condyle relationship. Of all the various treatment modalities used in the management of disc displacements, flat occlusal and anterior repositioning splints are the most commonly used. Myofunctional appliances (such as bite-jumping appliances) are also advocated to treat anterior disc displacements. The present study compares the efficacy of twin blocks with conventional flat occlusal splints in patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction using clinical examination, MRI, and EMG. The sample consisted of 20 subjects between 12 and 20 years of age, who were randomly divided into two groups of 10 patients each: Group 1 was treated with twin blocks, while group 2 was treated using maxillary flat occlusal splints. The twin block is more effective in relieving joint pain, diminishing joint dysfunction, reducing joint clicking, and eliminating muscle tenderness in patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction as compared to the occlusal splint.</p>","PeriodicalId":87213,"journal":{"name":"World journal of orthodontics","volume":"11 3","pages":"236-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is characterized by an abnormal disc-condyle relationship. Of all the various treatment modalities used in the management of disc displacements, flat occlusal and anterior repositioning splints are the most commonly used. Myofunctional appliances (such as bite-jumping appliances) are also advocated to treat anterior disc displacements. The present study compares the efficacy of twin blocks with conventional flat occlusal splints in patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction using clinical examination, MRI, and EMG. The sample consisted of 20 subjects between 12 and 20 years of age, who were randomly divided into two groups of 10 patients each: Group 1 was treated with twin blocks, while group 2 was treated using maxillary flat occlusal splints. The twin block is more effective in relieving joint pain, diminishing joint dysfunction, reducing joint clicking, and eliminating muscle tenderness in patients with anterior disc displacement with reduction as compared to the occlusal splint.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床,MRI和肌电图分析比较双块和平面咬合夹板治疗椎间盘移位复位的疗效。
颞下颌关节(TMJ)的内部紊乱以异常的椎间盘-髁关系为特征。在所有用于治疗椎间盘移位的各种治疗方式中,平咬合和前复位夹板是最常用的。肌功能矫治器(如咬跳矫治器)也被提倡用于治疗前椎间盘移位。本研究通过临床检查、MRI和肌电图比较双块与传统平面咬合夹板对前盘移位复位患者的疗效。样本共20例,年龄在12 ~ 20岁之间,随机分为两组,每组10例:组1采用双牙块治疗,组2采用上颌平咬合夹板治疗。与咬合夹板相比,双块在缓解关节疼痛、减少关节功能障碍、减少关节咔嗒声和消除前椎间盘移位患者的肌肉压痛方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The mousetrap. The relationship between the ICON index and the dental and aesthetic components of the IOTN index. Height and width of orthodontically treated palates in Class II Division 1 patients: a longitudinal study. Dentoalveolar changes after unilateral extractions of mandibular first molars and their influence on third molar development and position. Factors associated with orthodontic stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1