Walking ability during daily life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or the hip and lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross sectional study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2010-10-12 DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-11-233
Corinna C Winter, Mirko Brandes, Carsten Müller, Tim Schubert, Michael Ringling, Axel Hillmann, Dieter Rosenbaum, Tobias L Schulte
{"title":"Walking ability during daily life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or the hip and lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross sectional study.","authors":"Corinna C Winter,&nbsp;Mirko Brandes,&nbsp;Carsten Müller,&nbsp;Tim Schubert,&nbsp;Michael Ringling,&nbsp;Axel Hillmann,&nbsp;Dieter Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Tobias L Schulte","doi":"10.1186/1471-2474-11-233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative musculoskeletal disorders are among the most frequent diseases occurring in adulthood, often impairing patients' functional mobility and physical activity. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the impact of three frequent degenerative musculoskeletal disorders--knee osteoarthritis (knee OA), hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)--on patients' walking ability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 120 participants, with 30 in each patient group and 30 healthy control individuals. A uniaxial accelerometer, the StepWatch™ Activity Monitor (Orthocare Innovations, Seattle, Washington, USA), was used to determine the volume (number of gait cycles per day) and intensity (gait cycles per minute) of walking ability. Non-parametric testing was used for all statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the volume and the intensity of walking ability were significantly lower among the patients in comparison with the healthy control individuals (p < 0.001). Patients with LSS spent 0.4 (IQR 2.8) min/day doing moderately intense walking (>50 gait cycles/min), which was significantly lower in comparison with patients with knee and hip OA at 2.5 (IQR 4.4) and 3.4 (IQR 16.1) min/day, respectively (p < 0.001). No correlations between demographic or anthropometric data and walking ability were found. No technical problems or measuring errors occurred with any of the measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with degenerative musculoskeletal disorders suffer limitations in their walking ability. Objective assessment of walking ability appeared to be an easy and feasible tool for measuring such limitations as it provides baseline data and objective information that are more precise than the patients' own subjective estimates. In everyday practice, objective activity assessment can provide feedback for clinicians regarding patients' performance during everyday life and the extent to which this confirms the results of clinical investigations. The method can also be used as a way of encouraging patients to develop a more active lifestyle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1471-2474-11-233","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

Abstract

Background: Degenerative musculoskeletal disorders are among the most frequent diseases occurring in adulthood, often impairing patients' functional mobility and physical activity. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the impact of three frequent degenerative musculoskeletal disorders--knee osteoarthritis (knee OA), hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)--on patients' walking ability.

Methods: The study included 120 participants, with 30 in each patient group and 30 healthy control individuals. A uniaxial accelerometer, the StepWatch™ Activity Monitor (Orthocare Innovations, Seattle, Washington, USA), was used to determine the volume (number of gait cycles per day) and intensity (gait cycles per minute) of walking ability. Non-parametric testing was used for all statistical analyses.

Results: Both the volume and the intensity of walking ability were significantly lower among the patients in comparison with the healthy control individuals (p < 0.001). Patients with LSS spent 0.4 (IQR 2.8) min/day doing moderately intense walking (>50 gait cycles/min), which was significantly lower in comparison with patients with knee and hip OA at 2.5 (IQR 4.4) and 3.4 (IQR 16.1) min/day, respectively (p < 0.001). No correlations between demographic or anthropometric data and walking ability were found. No technical problems or measuring errors occurred with any of the measurements.

Conclusions: Patients with degenerative musculoskeletal disorders suffer limitations in their walking ability. Objective assessment of walking ability appeared to be an easy and feasible tool for measuring such limitations as it provides baseline data and objective information that are more precise than the patients' own subjective estimates. In everyday practice, objective activity assessment can provide feedback for clinicians regarding patients' performance during everyday life and the extent to which this confirms the results of clinical investigations. The method can also be used as a way of encouraging patients to develop a more active lifestyle.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节或髋关节骨关节炎和腰椎管狭窄患者日常生活中的行走能力:一项横断面研究。
背景:退行性肌肉骨骼疾病是成年人最常见的疾病之一,通常会损害患者的功能活动和身体活动。本研究的目的是调查和比较三种常见的退行性肌肉骨骼疾病——膝关节骨关节炎(膝关节OA)、髋关节骨关节炎(髋关节OA)和腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)对患者行走能力的影响。方法:本研究共纳入120例受试者,每组30例,对照组30例。使用单轴加速度计StepWatch™活动监视器(Orthocare Innovations, Seattle, Washington, USA)来确定步行能力的体积(每天的步态周期数)和强度(每分钟的步态周期数)。所有统计分析均采用非参数检验。结果:与健康对照组相比,患者的步行量和步行能力强度均显著降低(p < 0.001)。LSS患者进行中等强度步行(>50个步态周期/分钟)的时间为0.4 (IQR 2.8)分钟/天,明显低于膝关节和髋关节OA患者的2.5 (IQR 4.4)和3.4 (IQR 16.1)分钟/天(p < 0.001)。没有发现人口统计学或人体测量数据与行走能力之间的相关性。任何测量都没有出现技术问题或测量错误。结论:退行性肌肉骨骼疾病患者行走能力受限。对行走能力的客观评估似乎是衡量这些局限性的一种简单可行的工具,因为它提供了基线数据和客观信息,比患者自己的主观估计更精确。在日常实践中,客观活动评估可以为临床医生提供关于患者日常生活表现的反馈,以及这在多大程度上证实了临床调查结果。这种方法也可以用来鼓励病人养成更积极的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with and without cable cerclage for intertrochanteric femoral fractures with vulnerable lateral wall: a retrospective cohort study. Physical and mental health outcomes in Syrian lower limb amputees: the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation in post-conflict settings. Effects of arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscoplasty of discoid meniscus on lower limb axial alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Observational study exploring the association between sexes and perioperative morbidities after aseptic hip revision arthroplasty. The effect of multimodal rehabilitation program on pain, functional outcomes, and plantar fascia thickness in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1