[Evaluation of operative treatment of subcutaneous rupture of the achilles tendon--correlation between clinical presentation and ultrasound examination].

Ryszard Gumański, Jacek Kruczyński, Dariusz Matewski, Mariusz Sniegowski, Joanna Drewa, Margarita Lianeri
{"title":"[Evaluation of operative treatment of subcutaneous rupture of the achilles tendon--correlation between clinical presentation and ultrasound examination].","authors":"Ryszard Gumański,&nbsp;Jacek Kruczyński,&nbsp;Dariusz Matewski,&nbsp;Mariusz Sniegowski,&nbsp;Joanna Drewa,&nbsp;Margarita Lianeri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve of the effectiveness of surgical procedures in the repair of rupture of the Achilles tendon, some surgeons use various augmented techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of graft from the fascia lata to add strength to the Bunnell suture in the treatment of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon on the base of clinical and ultrasonographic results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>44 cases of the Achilles tendon lesion in 43 patients were included to the study. The patients were placed quasi-randomly into one of the two groups--group A of 26 tendons, repaired using the Bunnell suture with the reinforcement by a graft of the fascia lata, and group B of 18 tendons, repaired with simple end-to-end Bunnell suture. Results of the treatment were evaluated by the objective 100-point Hannover scale and subjectively by the modified Rupp scale. Results of the static and dynamic ultrasound examination were also analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference due to Hannover and Rupp scales in results between the two repair methods. The analysis of results of ultrasound examinations demonstrated that the decreased visibility of internal structures was statistically greater in the patients whose tendon was sutured using a graft from the fascia lata. The treatment method did not, however, influence the presence of inflammatory changes or the quality of sliding ability, as seen in ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open reconstruction of the subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon, regardless fascia lata was used or not, gives a high percent of positive results, both in subjective and objective evaluations. Use of the fascia lata in repair of the Achilles tendon increases the probability of ultrasonographically visible structural changes in the tendon without clinical consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":75702,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","volume":"75 3","pages":"147-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve of the effectiveness of surgical procedures in the repair of rupture of the Achilles tendon, some surgeons use various augmented techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of graft from the fascia lata to add strength to the Bunnell suture in the treatment of subcutaneous tear of the Achilles tendon on the base of clinical and ultrasonographic results.

Materials and methods: 44 cases of the Achilles tendon lesion in 43 patients were included to the study. The patients were placed quasi-randomly into one of the two groups--group A of 26 tendons, repaired using the Bunnell suture with the reinforcement by a graft of the fascia lata, and group B of 18 tendons, repaired with simple end-to-end Bunnell suture. Results of the treatment were evaluated by the objective 100-point Hannover scale and subjectively by the modified Rupp scale. Results of the static and dynamic ultrasound examination were also analysed.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference due to Hannover and Rupp scales in results between the two repair methods. The analysis of results of ultrasound examinations demonstrated that the decreased visibility of internal structures was statistically greater in the patients whose tendon was sutured using a graft from the fascia lata. The treatment method did not, however, influence the presence of inflammatory changes or the quality of sliding ability, as seen in ultrasound.

Conclusions: Open reconstruction of the subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon, regardless fascia lata was used or not, gives a high percent of positive results, both in subjective and objective evaluations. Use of the fascia lata in repair of the Achilles tendon increases the probability of ultrasonographically visible structural changes in the tendon without clinical consequences.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【跟腱皮下断裂手术治疗的评价——临床表现与超声检查的相关性】。
目的:为了提高跟腱断裂修复手术的有效性,一些外科医生采用了各种增强技术。本研究的目的是在临床和超声检查结果的基础上,评估使用阔筋膜移植增加Bunnell缝合强度治疗跟腱皮下撕裂的价值。材料与方法:选取43例跟腱病变44例进行研究。将患者准随机分为两组:A组26根肌腱,采用Bunnell缝合加阔筋膜移植加固修复;B组18根肌腱,采用简单端到端Bunnell缝合修复。客观采用汉诺威100分量表,主观采用改良Rupp量表评价治疗结果。并对静、动态超声检查结果进行了分析。结果:两种修复方法的汉诺威量表和Rupp量表结果差异无统计学意义。超声检查结果的分析表明,在使用阔筋膜移植缝合肌腱的患者中,内部结构的可视性下降在统计学上更大。然而,治疗方法不影响炎性改变的存在或滑动能力的质量,如超声所见。结论:开放重建跟腱皮下断裂,无论是否使用阔筋膜,在主观和客观评价中都有很高的阳性率。使用阔筋膜修复跟腱增加了超声可见的跟腱结构改变的可能性,而没有临床后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Walking patterns of skeletally mature patients with scoliosis and myelomeningocele]. [Spontaneous patellar tendon rupture as a result of morbid obesity]. Surgical treatment outcome evaluation of hip joint acetabular fracture. Open reduction and internal stabilization of acetabular fractures in pregnancy--case report. [Animal model of humeral joint for shoulder arthroscopy training].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1