School performance and praxis assessment in children with Rolandic Epilepsy.

Ecila Paula dos Mesquita de Oliveira, Marina Liberalesso Neri, Lívia Lucena de Medeiros, Catarina Abraão Guimarães, Marilisa Mantovani Guerreiro
{"title":"School performance and praxis assessment in children with Rolandic Epilepsy.","authors":"Ecila Paula dos Mesquita de Oliveira,&nbsp;Marina Liberalesso Neri,&nbsp;Lívia Lucena de Medeiros,&nbsp;Catarina Abraão Guimarães,&nbsp;Marilisa Mantovani Guerreiro","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872010000300009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rolandic Epilepsy is the most common form of childhood epilepsy. It is classified as idiopathic, age-related epileptic syndrome with benign evolution. The absence of neuropsychological impairment is part of the criteria of benignity of this epilepsy syndrome. Recently, however, several deficits related to attention and language have been suggested.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to assess school performance and to investigate praxis problems in patients with rolandic epilepsy in comparison to a control group of normal children, paired by age, gender and educational level.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>nineteen patients aged between 7 and 12 years underwent clinical neurological evaluation, psychological assessment, through the Weschsler Scales of Intelligence, and language evaluation, to assess the academic performance and to investigate the presence or absence of praxis difficulties.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>the obtained data indicate that although intellectual efficiency (measured through the Intelligence Quatient - IQ) was within average, children with rolandic epilepsy presented a significantly poorer performance when compared to the control group in tests involving writing, arithmetic and reading. Another important aspect was the absence of orofacial apraxia in children with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the results of the study suggest that the assessment of children with epilepsy is necessary to investigate specific deficits that require appropriate professional assistance. Regarding the presence of oral language and/or writing disorders in these children, academic, social and emotional deficits can be avoided. The prognosis of epileptic syndrome does not exclusively depend on the control of the crises, since social or cultural problems can interfere in life quality as much as the crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"22 3","pages":"209-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872010000300009","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872010000300009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Rolandic Epilepsy is the most common form of childhood epilepsy. It is classified as idiopathic, age-related epileptic syndrome with benign evolution. The absence of neuropsychological impairment is part of the criteria of benignity of this epilepsy syndrome. Recently, however, several deficits related to attention and language have been suggested.

Aim: to assess school performance and to investigate praxis problems in patients with rolandic epilepsy in comparison to a control group of normal children, paired by age, gender and educational level.

Method: nineteen patients aged between 7 and 12 years underwent clinical neurological evaluation, psychological assessment, through the Weschsler Scales of Intelligence, and language evaluation, to assess the academic performance and to investigate the presence or absence of praxis difficulties.

Result: the obtained data indicate that although intellectual efficiency (measured through the Intelligence Quatient - IQ) was within average, children with rolandic epilepsy presented a significantly poorer performance when compared to the control group in tests involving writing, arithmetic and reading. Another important aspect was the absence of orofacial apraxia in children with epilepsy.

Conclusion: the results of the study suggest that the assessment of children with epilepsy is necessary to investigate specific deficits that require appropriate professional assistance. Regarding the presence of oral language and/or writing disorders in these children, academic, social and emotional deficits can be avoided. The prognosis of epileptic syndrome does not exclusively depend on the control of the crises, since social or cultural problems can interfere in life quality as much as the crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗兰癫痫患儿的学校表现和实践评估。
背景:罗兰癫痫是儿童癫痫最常见的形式。它被归类为特发性,与年龄相关的良性演变癫痫综合征。无神经心理损伤是癫痫综合征良性诊断标准的一部分。然而,最近提出了一些与注意力和语言有关的缺陷。目的:根据年龄、性别和教育水平,评估罗兰癫痫患者的学习表现,并与对照组的正常儿童进行比较。方法:对19例年龄在7 ~ 12岁之间的儿童进行临床神经学评估、心理评估、威氏智力量表和语言评估,评估其学习成绩和有无实践困难。结果:获得的数据表明,虽然智力效率(通过智商测量)在平均范围内,但罗兰癫痫患儿在写作、算术和阅读测试中的表现明显低于对照组。另一个重要方面是癫痫患儿无面部失用症。结论:研究结果表明,对癫痫儿童进行评估是必要的,以调查需要适当专业协助的特定缺陷。对于这些儿童存在的口语和/或写作障碍,可以避免学业、社交和情感缺陷。癫痫综合征的预后并不完全取决于对危机的控制,因为社会或文化问题可以像危机一样干扰生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral narratives of children with typical language development. Otoacoustic emissions growth rate threshold: distortion product in neonates. Standardization of brainstem auditory evoked potential using a new device. Impact of dizziness on the life quality of elderly with chronic vestibulopathy. Extralinguistic variables, gender and age, in the self-awareness of speech impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1