Comparison of vinorelbine-Cisplatin with gemcitabine-Cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Sevket Ozkaya, Serhat Findik, Oguz Uzun, Atilla Guven Atici, Levent Erkan
{"title":"Comparison of vinorelbine-Cisplatin with gemcitabine-Cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Sevket Ozkaya, Serhat Findik, Oguz Uzun, Atilla Guven Atici, Levent Erkan","doi":"10.4137/ccrpm.s578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (VC arm) or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (GC arm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirtyfour patients (67 VC and 67 GC) were included to the study. Overall response rates for the VC arm (31.2%) were not significantly different from that of the GC arm (34.3%). There were no differences in overall survival and one-year survival rates. Median survival and one-year survival rates for the VC and GC groups were 10.6 and 11.5 months, 45% and 46.8%, respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher on the GC arm (VC 1.4% v GC 8.9%, p < 0.05), as was febrile neutropenia on the VC arm (VC 8.9% v GC 1.4%, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VC and GC demonstrated similar efficacy but there were differences in toxicity profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":88227,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine","volume":"2 ","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2990234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/ccrpm.s578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (VC arm) or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) every 21 days (GC arm).

Results: One hundred thirtyfour patients (67 VC and 67 GC) were included to the study. Overall response rates for the VC arm (31.2%) were not significantly different from that of the GC arm (34.3%). There were no differences in overall survival and one-year survival rates. Median survival and one-year survival rates for the VC and GC groups were 10.6 and 11.5 months, 45% and 46.8%, respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher on the GC arm (VC 1.4% v GC 8.9%, p < 0.05), as was febrile neutropenia on the VC arm (VC 8.9% v GC 1.4%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: VC and GC demonstrated similar efficacy but there were differences in toxicity profiles.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中比较长春瑞滨-顺铂与吉西他滨-顺铂。
目的:本试验的目的是比较顺铂加维诺瑞宾方案与顺铂加吉西他滨方案对IIIB-IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗效果:IIIB-IV期非小细胞肺癌患者接受维诺艾宾30毫克/米(2)(第1天和第8天)加顺铂80毫克/米(2)(第1天),每21天一次(VC治疗组)或吉西他滨1250毫克/米(2)(第1天和第8天)加顺铂80毫克/米(2)(第1天),每21天一次(GC治疗组):研究共纳入134名患者(67名VC患者和67名GC患者)。VC治疗组的总体反应率(31.2%)与GC治疗组的总体反应率(34.3%)无显著差异。总生存率和一年生存率没有差异。VC组和GC组的中位生存期和一年生存率分别为10.6个月和11.5个月,45%和46.8%。GC组的3-4级血小板减少率明显更高(VC组为1.4%,GC组为8.9%,P<0.05),VC组的发热性中性粒细胞减少率也更高(VC组为8.9%,GC组为1.4%,P<0.05):结论:VC和GC具有相似的疗效,但在毒性方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gene Variant of the Bradykinin B2 Receptor Influences Pulmonary Arterial Pressures in Heart Failure Patients. Gene Variant of the Bradykinin B2 Receptor Influences Pulmonary Arterial Pressures in Heart Failure Patients Analysis of respiratory sounds: state of the art. Neuroimmune interaction in inflammatory diseases. Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality Score as a Severity Adjustor in the Medical ICU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1