Cochlear implant: correlation of nerve function recovery, auditory deprivation and etiology.

Kellen Kutscher, Maria Valéria S Goffi-Gomez, Débora Maria Befi-Lopes, Robinson Koji Tsuji, Ricardo Ferreira Bento
{"title":"Cochlear implant: correlation of nerve function recovery, auditory deprivation and etiology.","authors":"Kellen Kutscher,&nbsp;Maria Valéria S Goffi-Gomez,&nbsp;Débora Maria Befi-Lopes,&nbsp;Robinson Koji Tsuji,&nbsp;Ricardo Ferreira Bento","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872010000400019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Auditory Nerve Recovery Function (REC) may be extracted from the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP). ECAP may be influenced by the stimulation received (or the deprivation of stimulation) and by the etiology of the hearing loss, consequently it might affect the REC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To verify whether there is a correlation between the REC and each of the following factors: etiology, time of auditory deprivation and time of hearing aid use before cochlear implantation (CI).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective study. Data regarding etiology, time of auditory deprivation, time of hearing aid use before cochlear implantation were collected in children and adults who received a Nucleus®24. All patients who presented neural response at surgery and whose REC was assessed intraoperatively were included in this study. Fifty patients were selected, 26 children and 24 adults. Patients were divided according to the REC classification into three groups (GI: fast recovery; GII: intermediate recovery and GIII: slow recovery) to allow correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis did not show any statistically significant correlation between the recovery function and the pre-implant studied characteristics. Nevertheless, it was observed that there was a greater concentration of both, children and adults, in the intermediate recovery function values. GI did not present individuals with infectious etiologies, such as meningitis, rubella and cytomegalovirus. REC average scores were slower in infectious etiologies for both children and adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no statistically significant correlation between the recovery function and factors such as etiology, time of auditory deprivation and time of hearing aid use prior to CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"22 4","pages":"473-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872010000400019","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872010000400019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The Auditory Nerve Recovery Function (REC) may be extracted from the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP). ECAP may be influenced by the stimulation received (or the deprivation of stimulation) and by the etiology of the hearing loss, consequently it might affect the REC.

Aim: To verify whether there is a correlation between the REC and each of the following factors: etiology, time of auditory deprivation and time of hearing aid use before cochlear implantation (CI).

Method: Retrospective study. Data regarding etiology, time of auditory deprivation, time of hearing aid use before cochlear implantation were collected in children and adults who received a Nucleus®24. All patients who presented neural response at surgery and whose REC was assessed intraoperatively were included in this study. Fifty patients were selected, 26 children and 24 adults. Patients were divided according to the REC classification into three groups (GI: fast recovery; GII: intermediate recovery and GIII: slow recovery) to allow correlation analysis.

Results: Data analysis did not show any statistically significant correlation between the recovery function and the pre-implant studied characteristics. Nevertheless, it was observed that there was a greater concentration of both, children and adults, in the intermediate recovery function values. GI did not present individuals with infectious etiologies, such as meningitis, rubella and cytomegalovirus. REC average scores were slower in infectious etiologies for both children and adults.

Conclusion: There was no statistically significant correlation between the recovery function and factors such as etiology, time of auditory deprivation and time of hearing aid use prior to CI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工耳蜗:神经功能恢复、听觉剥夺与病因的关系。
背景:听觉神经恢复功能(REC)可以从电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)中提取。ECAP可能受到刺激(或刺激剥夺)和听力损失的病因的影响,从而影响REC。目的:验证REC与病因、听力剥夺时间和人工耳蜗植入前使用助听器的时间是否存在相关性。方法:回顾性研究。收集了接受Nucleus®24的儿童和成人在人工耳蜗植入前的病因、听觉剥夺时间、助听器使用时间等数据。所有在手术中出现神经反应并术中评估REC的患者均纳入本研究。选取50例患者,儿童26例,成人24例。根据REC分级将患者分为三组(GI组:快速恢复组;GII:中间恢复和GIII:缓慢恢复),以便进行相关性分析。结果:数据分析未显示恢复功能与种植前研究特征之间有统计学意义的相关性。然而,观察到儿童和成人在中间恢复函数值中都有较大的集中。胃肠道未发现个体感染性病因,如脑膜炎、风疹和巨细胞病毒。儿童和成人的REC平均得分在感染性病因方面都较慢。结论:CI前患者的恢复功能与病因、听觉剥夺时间、助听器使用时间等因素无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral narratives of children with typical language development. Otoacoustic emissions growth rate threshold: distortion product in neonates. Standardization of brainstem auditory evoked potential using a new device. Impact of dizziness on the life quality of elderly with chronic vestibulopathy. Extralinguistic variables, gender and age, in the self-awareness of speech impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1