M. Salvat-Plana , S. Abilleira , C. Jiménez , J. Marta , M. Gallofré
{"title":"Priorización de indicadores de calidad de la atención al paciente con ictus a partir de un método de consenso","authors":"M. Salvat-Plana , S. Abilleira , C. Jiménez , J. Marta , M. Gallofré","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2010.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define a core set of evidence-based performance indicators (PIs) for the assessment of in-hospital stroke care quality by means of consensus prioritisation by a panel of experts representing stroke care professionals in three Autonomous Communities (Catalonia, Aragon and Balearic Islands).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We used a modified Delphi method in two rounds to prioritise a set of PIs from among 70 indicators identified by a review of the literature and those already used in previous experiences. Consensus on validity was reached when ≥75% of panellists rated a PI in the top tertile, using a 1-9 Likert scale. On the basis of the percentage distribution of annual stroke admissions in each one of the 3 regions, we configured a multidisciplinary panel of 56 experts involved in the hospital care of acute stroke patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine out of the 70 PIs initially put forward to the panel, have been prioritised after 2 rounds. The eventual core set of PIs consists of those with the highest scores and represent all areas of hospital-based stroke care. A subgroup of 5 PIs is applicable to Primary Stroke Centres only. The 3 highest rated PIs, which achieved the greatest consensus among the experts, are anticoagulants for AF, antithrombotics at discharge and continued physiotherapy planned at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Through a Delphi method, we have obtained a core set of evidence-based PIs considered of high importance and agreed by a multidisciplinary panel of stroke care experts from the participating Communities, which represent over 20% of the Spanish population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 174-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2010.12.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X11000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives
To define a core set of evidence-based performance indicators (PIs) for the assessment of in-hospital stroke care quality by means of consensus prioritisation by a panel of experts representing stroke care professionals in three Autonomous Communities (Catalonia, Aragon and Balearic Islands).
Material and methods
We used a modified Delphi method in two rounds to prioritise a set of PIs from among 70 indicators identified by a review of the literature and those already used in previous experiences. Consensus on validity was reached when ≥75% of panellists rated a PI in the top tertile, using a 1-9 Likert scale. On the basis of the percentage distribution of annual stroke admissions in each one of the 3 regions, we configured a multidisciplinary panel of 56 experts involved in the hospital care of acute stroke patients.
Results
Twenty-nine out of the 70 PIs initially put forward to the panel, have been prioritised after 2 rounds. The eventual core set of PIs consists of those with the highest scores and represent all areas of hospital-based stroke care. A subgroup of 5 PIs is applicable to Primary Stroke Centres only. The 3 highest rated PIs, which achieved the greatest consensus among the experts, are anticoagulants for AF, antithrombotics at discharge and continued physiotherapy planned at discharge.
Conclusions
Through a Delphi method, we have obtained a core set of evidence-based PIs considered of high importance and agreed by a multidisciplinary panel of stroke care experts from the participating Communities, which represent over 20% of the Spanish population.