Priorización de indicadores de calidad de la atención al paciente con ictus a partir de un método de consenso

M. Salvat-Plana , S. Abilleira , C. Jiménez , J. Marta , M. Gallofré
{"title":"Priorización de indicadores de calidad de la atención al paciente con ictus a partir de un método de consenso","authors":"M. Salvat-Plana ,&nbsp;S. Abilleira ,&nbsp;C. Jiménez ,&nbsp;J. Marta ,&nbsp;M. Gallofré","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2010.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define a core set of evidence-based performance indicators (PIs) for the assessment of in-hospital stroke care quality by means of consensus prioritisation by a panel of experts representing stroke care professionals in three Autonomous Communities (Catalonia, Aragon and Balearic Islands).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We used a modified Delphi method in two rounds to prioritise a set of PIs from among 70 indicators identified by a review of the literature and those already used in previous experiences. Consensus on validity was reached when ≥75% of panellists rated a PI in the top tertile, using a 1-9 Likert scale. On the basis of the percentage distribution of annual stroke admissions in each one of the 3 regions, we configured a multidisciplinary panel of 56 experts involved in the hospital care of acute stroke patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine out of the 70 PIs initially put forward to the panel, have been prioritised after 2 rounds. The eventual core set of PIs consists of those with the highest scores and represent all areas of hospital-based stroke care. A subgroup of 5 PIs is applicable to Primary Stroke Centres only. The 3 highest rated PIs, which achieved the greatest consensus among the experts, are anticoagulants for AF, antithrombotics at discharge and continued physiotherapy planned at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Through a Delphi method, we have obtained a core set of evidence-based PIs considered of high importance and agreed by a multidisciplinary panel of stroke care experts from the participating Communities, which represent over 20% of the Spanish population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 174-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2010.12.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X11000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

To define a core set of evidence-based performance indicators (PIs) for the assessment of in-hospital stroke care quality by means of consensus prioritisation by a panel of experts representing stroke care professionals in three Autonomous Communities (Catalonia, Aragon and Balearic Islands).

Material and methods

We used a modified Delphi method in two rounds to prioritise a set of PIs from among 70 indicators identified by a review of the literature and those already used in previous experiences. Consensus on validity was reached when ≥75% of panellists rated a PI in the top tertile, using a 1-9 Likert scale. On the basis of the percentage distribution of annual stroke admissions in each one of the 3 regions, we configured a multidisciplinary panel of 56 experts involved in the hospital care of acute stroke patients.

Results

Twenty-nine out of the 70 PIs initially put forward to the panel, have been prioritised after 2 rounds. The eventual core set of PIs consists of those with the highest scores and represent all areas of hospital-based stroke care. A subgroup of 5 PIs is applicable to Primary Stroke Centres only. The 3 highest rated PIs, which achieved the greatest consensus among the experts, are anticoagulants for AF, antithrombotics at discharge and continued physiotherapy planned at discharge.

Conclusions

Through a Delphi method, we have obtained a core set of evidence-based PIs considered of high importance and agreed by a multidisciplinary panel of stroke care experts from the participating Communities, which represent over 20% of the Spanish population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于共识方法对中风患者护理质量指标进行优先排序
目的:通过代表三个自治区(加泰罗尼亚、阿拉贡和巴利阿里群岛)卒中护理专业人员的专家小组的共识优先级,定义一套核心循证绩效指标(pi),用于评估院内卒中护理质量。材料和方法我们在两轮中使用了一种改进的德尔菲法,从文献回顾和以前经验中已经使用的70个指标中确定一组pi。当≥75%的小组成员使用1-9的李克特量表在前五分位数中评价PI时,就有效性达成共识。根据这三个地区每年卒中入院的百分比分布,我们配置了一个由56名专家组成的多学科小组,参与急性卒中患者的医院护理。结果在最初向专家组提出的70个项目中,有29个项目经过2轮筛选获得优先考虑。最终的核心pi集由那些得分最高的人组成,代表了医院中风护理的所有领域。一组5个pi只适用于初级中风中心。专家一致评价最高的3个pi是房颤抗凝剂、出院时抗血栓药物和出院时计划的持续物理治疗。通过德尔菲法,我们获得了一组核心循证pi,这些pi被认为是高度重要的,并得到了来自参与社区的多学科中风护理专家小组的同意,这些社区代表了超过20%的西班牙人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Del papel a las nuevas tecnologías en la comunicación con nuestros pacientes Impacto de un programa de gestión de riesgo en la tasa de úlceras por presión La enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC): ¿esa gran conocida? Reflexiones sobre cómo mejorar la calidad diagnóstica El capital social como determinante de salud pública Efectividad de la evaluación de historias clínicas informatizadas en un hospital universitario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1