Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-02-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-19 DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1269904
S L Parker, O Adogwa, T F Witham, O S Aaronson, J Cheng, M J McGirt
{"title":"Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.","authors":"S L Parker,&nbsp;O Adogwa,&nbsp;T F Witham,&nbsp;O S Aaronson,&nbsp;J Cheng,&nbsp;M J McGirt","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1269904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) in the setting of lumbar fusion is associated with significant morbidity and medical resource utilization. To date, there have been no studies conducted with sufficient power to directly compare the incidence of SSI following minimally invasive (MIS) vs. open TLIF procedures. Furthermore, studies are lacking that quantify the direct medical cost of SSI following fusion procedures. We set out to determine the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing MIS vs. open TLIF reported in the literature and to determine the direct hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic Medline search was performed to identify all published studies assessing SSI after MIS or open TLIF. The cumulative incidence of SSI was calculated from all reported cohorts and compared between MIS vs. open TLIF. In order to determine the direct hospital costs associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF, we retrospectively reviewed 120 consecutive TLIFs performed at our institution, assessed the incidence of SSI, and calculated the SSI-related hospital costs from accounting and billing records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To date, there have been 10 MIS-TLIF cohorts (362 patients) and 20 open-TLIF cohorts (1 133 patients) reporting incidences of SSI. The cumulative incidence of reported SSI was significantly lower for MIS vs. open-TLIF (0.6% vs. 4.0%, p=0.0005). In our experience with 120 open TLIF procedures, SSI occurred in 6 (5.0%) patients. The mean hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF was $ 29,110 in these 6 cases. The 3.4% decrease in reported incidence of SSI for MIS vs. open-TLIF corresponds to a direct cost savings of $ 98,974 per 100 MIS-TLIF procedures performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-operative wound infections following TLIF are costly complications. MIS vs. open TLIF is associated with a decreased reported incidence of SSI in the literature and may be a valuable tool in reducing hospital costs associated with spine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1269904","citationCount":"169","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1269904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 169

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) in the setting of lumbar fusion is associated with significant morbidity and medical resource utilization. To date, there have been no studies conducted with sufficient power to directly compare the incidence of SSI following minimally invasive (MIS) vs. open TLIF procedures. Furthermore, studies are lacking that quantify the direct medical cost of SSI following fusion procedures. We set out to determine the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing MIS vs. open TLIF reported in the literature and to determine the direct hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF at our institution.

Methods: A systematic Medline search was performed to identify all published studies assessing SSI after MIS or open TLIF. The cumulative incidence of SSI was calculated from all reported cohorts and compared between MIS vs. open TLIF. In order to determine the direct hospital costs associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF, we retrospectively reviewed 120 consecutive TLIFs performed at our institution, assessed the incidence of SSI, and calculated the SSI-related hospital costs from accounting and billing records.

Results: To date, there have been 10 MIS-TLIF cohorts (362 patients) and 20 open-TLIF cohorts (1 133 patients) reporting incidences of SSI. The cumulative incidence of reported SSI was significantly lower for MIS vs. open-TLIF (0.6% vs. 4.0%, p=0.0005). In our experience with 120 open TLIF procedures, SSI occurred in 6 (5.0%) patients. The mean hospital cost associated with the treatment of SSI following TLIF was $ 29,110 in these 6 cases. The 3.4% decrease in reported incidence of SSI for MIS vs. open-TLIF corresponds to a direct cost savings of $ 98,974 per 100 MIS-TLIF procedures performed.

Conclusions: Post-operative wound infections following TLIF are costly complications. MIS vs. open TLIF is associated with a decreased reported incidence of SSI in the literature and may be a valuable tool in reducing hospital costs associated with spine care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创与开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)术后感染:文献回顾和成本分析。
导读:腰椎融合术中手术部位感染(SSI)与显著的发病率和医疗资源利用率相关。迄今为止,还没有足够有力的研究直接比较微创(MIS)和开放式TLIF手术后SSI的发生率。此外,缺乏量化融合手术后SSI直接医疗费用的研究。我们着手确定文献中报道的MIS患者与开放式TLIF患者的SSI发生率,并确定我院TLIF后与SSI治疗相关的直接医院费用。方法:进行系统的Medline检索,以确定所有已发表的评估MIS或开放TLIF后SSI的研究。从所有报告的队列中计算SSI的累积发生率,并比较MIS与开放TLIF之间的差异。为了确定与tliff后SSI治疗相关的直接医院费用,我们回顾性地回顾了我院连续实施的120例tliff,评估了SSI的发生率,并从会计和账单记录中计算了SSI相关的医院费用。结果:迄今为止,已有10个MIS-TLIF队列(362例患者)和20个开放式tlif队列(1133例患者)报告了SSI的发生率。报告的SSI累积发生率在MIS组明显低于open-TLIF组(0.6% vs. 4.0%, p=0.0005)。在我们120例开放式TLIF手术的经验中,6例(5.0%)患者发生SSI。在这6例中,与TLIF后SSI治疗相关的平均住院费用为29,110美元。与开放式tlif相比,MIS的SSI发生率降低了3.4%,相当于每进行100例MIS- tlif手术可节省98,974美元的直接成本。结论:TLIF术后伤口感染是代价高昂的并发症。与开放式TLIF相比,MIS与文献中报道的SSI发生率降低有关,可能是降低脊柱护理相关医院费用的有价值工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vidian nerve neurofibroma removed via a transpterygoid approach. Dual, minimally invasive fixation in acute, double, thoracic spine fracture. Massive swelling of Surgicel® Fibrillar™ hemostat after spinal surgery. Case report and a review of the literature. Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks in the postero-superior wall of the frontal sinus - report of 2 cases. Combined staged endoscopic and microsurgical approach of a third ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in an infant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1