Screening for abuse risk in pain patients.

Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-19 DOI:10.1159/000324069
Tara M Bohn, Lauren B Levy, Sheyla Celin, Tatiana D Starr, Steven D Passik
{"title":"Screening for abuse risk in pain patients.","authors":"Tara M Bohn,&nbsp;Lauren B Levy,&nbsp;Sheyla Celin,&nbsp;Tatiana D Starr,&nbsp;Steven D Passik","doi":"10.1159/000324069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As opioid prescribing has dramatically expanded over the past decade, so too has the problem of prescription drug abuse. In response to these now two major public health problems - the problem of poorly treated chronic pain and the problem of opioid abuse - a new paradigm has arisen in pain management, namely risk stratification. Once a prescriber has determined that opioids will be used (a medical decision based on how intense the pain is, what has been tried and failed and, to some extent, what type of pain the patient has), he/she must then decide how opioid therapy is to be delivered. Different models of delivery of opioid therapy can be utilized, beginning the process with a risk assessment that is highly individualized to each patient. Recently, researchers have produced a wide variety of literature regarding assessment tools to be used for this purpose. And while there remains a need for larger prospective studies to examine the ability of each tool to predict aberrant drug-taking behaviors, clinicians can and should utilize one or more of these screening tools and understand their benefits and limitations. This chapter will describe the nature of current screening assessments, their potential for use in the pain population in various settings, past clinical observations and suggestions for moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":50851,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","volume":"30 ","pages":"113-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000324069","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000324069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As opioid prescribing has dramatically expanded over the past decade, so too has the problem of prescription drug abuse. In response to these now two major public health problems - the problem of poorly treated chronic pain and the problem of opioid abuse - a new paradigm has arisen in pain management, namely risk stratification. Once a prescriber has determined that opioids will be used (a medical decision based on how intense the pain is, what has been tried and failed and, to some extent, what type of pain the patient has), he/she must then decide how opioid therapy is to be delivered. Different models of delivery of opioid therapy can be utilized, beginning the process with a risk assessment that is highly individualized to each patient. Recently, researchers have produced a wide variety of literature regarding assessment tools to be used for this purpose. And while there remains a need for larger prospective studies to examine the ability of each tool to predict aberrant drug-taking behaviors, clinicians can and should utilize one or more of these screening tools and understand their benefits and limitations. This chapter will describe the nature of current screening assessments, their potential for use in the pain population in various settings, past clinical observations and suggestions for moving forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛患者滥用风险筛查。
随着阿片类药物处方在过去十年中急剧扩大,处方药滥用的问题也在扩大。针对目前这两个主要的公共卫生问题——慢性疼痛治疗不当问题和阿片类药物滥用问题——在疼痛管理方面出现了一种新的范例,即风险分层。一旦开处方者确定将使用阿片类药物(根据疼痛的强度、尝试过的方法和失败的方法以及在某种程度上病人的疼痛类型做出的医疗决定),他/她就必须决定如何提供阿片类药物治疗。可以采用不同的阿片类药物治疗模式,首先对每位患者进行高度个性化的风险评估。最近,研究人员已经制作了大量关于评估工具的文献,用于这一目的。虽然仍需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来检验每种工具预测异常服药行为的能力,但临床医生可以而且应该利用这些筛查工具中的一种或多种,并了解它们的优点和局限性。本章将描述当前筛查评估的性质,它们在各种情况下在疼痛人群中的潜在应用,过去的临床观察和向前发展的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The importance of psychosomatic research has been greatly reinforced by evidence demonstrating that psychological phenomena may have distinct effects on human health. Recognizing the complexity of interactions between personality and physical illness, this series employs an interdisciplinary strategy to explore areas where knowledge from psychosomatic medicine may aid in the prevention of specific diseases or help meet the emotional demands of hospitalized patients. In each work, the editor has managed to bring together distinguished contributors, creating a series of coherent and comprehensive reviews on a variety of novel topics.
期刊最新文献
Communication with patients suffering from serious physical illness. Dimensional psychopharmacology in somatising patients. Forensic issues in medical evaluation: competency and end-of-life issues. Then and now … HIV consultation psychiatry update. Fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue: the underlying biology and related theoretical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1