Does the outcome of prostate cancer patients with large prostates differ from small prostate size in permanent seed, low dose-rate brachytherapy?

Sirpa H Aaltomaa, Vesa V Kataja, Atte Räty, Jan-Erik Palmgren, Tapani Lahtinen
{"title":"Does the outcome of prostate cancer patients with large prostates differ from small prostate size in permanent seed, low dose-rate brachytherapy?","authors":"Sirpa H Aaltomaa,&nbsp;Vesa V Kataja,&nbsp;Atte Räty,&nbsp;Jan-Erik Palmgren,&nbsp;Tapani Lahtinen","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2011.590994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brachytherapy has good results in the treatment of early prostate cancer (PC). The procedure is challenging in large prostates, and the optimal prostate volume for brachytherapy was previously defined as ≤40 ml. This study analysed the outcome of PC patients with small (group A) and large (group B) prostate volume in prospective data.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The material consisted of 535 consecutive patients treated with brachytherapy in Kuopio University Hospital. The mean follow-up time was nearly 6 years. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was defined as PSA rising ≥2.0 μg/l above nadir. A PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA of ≥0.2 μg/l. The causes of death were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A bounce was recorded more frequently in group A (30%) than in group B (18%) (p = 0.006). A bounce correlated with young age predicted a favourable outcome in both groups. PSA failure rate was similar in both groups: 13% and 12% in groups A and B, respectively. Post-treatment PSA ≤0.5 μg/l was the only independent prognostic factor associated with PSA failure in both groups (p < 0.0001, both groups). PC survival was 98.4% in both groups. Overall survival was 91% and 94% in groups A and B, respectively (p = not significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences between the PC patients with small and large prostate volumes treated with brachytherapy with respect to PSA failure rate, PC survival or overall survival. All patients, independent of prostate size, are potential candidates for brachytherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"45 5","pages":"339-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.590994","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.590994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: Brachytherapy has good results in the treatment of early prostate cancer (PC). The procedure is challenging in large prostates, and the optimal prostate volume for brachytherapy was previously defined as ≤40 ml. This study analysed the outcome of PC patients with small (group A) and large (group B) prostate volume in prospective data.

Material and methods: The material consisted of 535 consecutive patients treated with brachytherapy in Kuopio University Hospital. The mean follow-up time was nearly 6 years. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was defined as PSA rising ≥2.0 μg/l above nadir. A PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA of ≥0.2 μg/l. The causes of death were recorded.

Results: A bounce was recorded more frequently in group A (30%) than in group B (18%) (p = 0.006). A bounce correlated with young age predicted a favourable outcome in both groups. PSA failure rate was similar in both groups: 13% and 12% in groups A and B, respectively. Post-treatment PSA ≤0.5 μg/l was the only independent prognostic factor associated with PSA failure in both groups (p < 0.0001, both groups). PC survival was 98.4% in both groups. Overall survival was 91% and 94% in groups A and B, respectively (p = not significant).

Conclusions: There were no differences between the PC patients with small and large prostate volumes treated with brachytherapy with respect to PSA failure rate, PC survival or overall survival. All patients, independent of prostate size, are potential candidates for brachytherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大前列腺癌患者与小前列腺癌患者在低剂量近距离放射治疗中的预后是否不同?
目的:近距离放射治疗早期前列腺癌疗效良好。对于大前列腺来说,该手术具有挑战性,近距离放射治疗的最佳前列腺体积之前被定义为≤40毫升。本研究分析了前瞻性数据中前列腺体积小(A组)和大(B组)的PC患者的结果。材料与方法:材料为在库奥皮奥大学医院连续接受近距离放射治疗的535例患者。平均随访时间近6年。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)高于最低水平≥2.0 μg/l。PSA反弹定义为PSA升高≥0.2 μg/l。死亡原因被记录下来。结果:A组的弹跳率(30%)高于B组(18%)(p = 0.006)。在两组中,与年轻相关的反弹预示着有利的结果。两组的PSA失败率相似:A组为13%,B组为12%。治疗后PSA≤0.5 μg/l是两组PSA失效的唯一独立预后因素(两组均p < 0.0001)。两组患者的PC生存率均为98.4%。A组和B组的总生存率分别为91%和94% (p =无统计学意义)。结论:前列腺体积小的前列腺癌患者与前列腺体积大的前列腺癌患者在PSA失败率、前列腺癌生存期及总生存期方面均无差异。所有患者,不论前列腺大小,都是近距离放疗的潜在候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations. Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy and ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter with ureteral calculus: first case report. Current routines for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a web-based survey by the Swedish Urology Network. Sleep quality and its correlates in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Sexual and relationship functioning before and after renal transplantation: a descriptive study with patients and partners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1