Comparison of target coverage and dose to organs at risk between simultaneous integrated-boost whole-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and junctioned intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional radiotherapy field in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Abstract

We have retrospectively investigated 15 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated at our institution between March 2007 and August 2009. We used simultaneous integrated-boost whole field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB WF-IMRT) to treat the entire planning target volume in the head and neck cancer. All of the SIB WF-IMRT plans were replanned by use of the junctioned intensity modulated radiation therapy (J-IMRT) technique for comparison. The effect on target coverage and sparing of organs at risk, including laryngeal sparing in the optimal SIB WF-IMRT plan was compared with that achieved with use of the J-IMRT technique. The mean larynx dose and standard deviation was 25.2 ± 5.8 Gy for SIB WF-IMRT and 19.8 ± 16.8 Gy for J-IMRT. A comparison between SIB WF-IMRT and the J-IMRT technique demonstrated that the larynx dose was increased in SIB WF-IMRT. However, when the strong dose constraint was applied to the larynx and the pseudo-volume was used for a steep dose fall-off immediately outside the target, the SIB WF-IMRT technique would have led to a larynx dose comparable to that achieved with J-IMRT. Therefore, in our current practice we use the SIB WF-IMRT technique, which does not have the problem of setup error at the match line for treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.