Topical anesthetic EMLA for postoperative wound pain in stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery: a perspective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-04-01 Epub Date: 2011-06-06 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1277229
C L Liang, K Lu, P C Liliang, M C Chung, S C Chi, H J Chen
{"title":"Topical anesthetic EMLA for postoperative wound pain in stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery: a perspective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"C L Liang,&nbsp;K Lu,&nbsp;P C Liliang,&nbsp;M C Chung,&nbsp;S C Chi,&nbsp;H J Chen","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1277229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who undergo stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) need a rigid frame fixation for the stereotactic procedures. Many patients suffered from postoperative wound pain after frame removal. The present study investigated whether an additional application of a topical anesthetic prior to frame removal could reduce this discomfort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>60 patients who underwent GKRS were enrolled in this study. Of these 60 patients, 30 were treated with a topical application of EMLA, a eutectic mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine; the remaining 30 were treated with a placebo. The nurses explained the definition of the visual analogue scale (VAS, scored from 0 to 10), and the patients evaluated their pain at 7 time points during the GKRS procedure by using the VAS. After each of these evaluations, the patients' vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the patients' age, gender, duration of frame fixation, and types of the lesions between the EMLA and placebo groups. The EMLA group reported significantly lower pain scores 20 and 60 min after frame removal than the placebo group (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Additionally, patients in the placebo group had significantly higher blood pressure readings compared with baseline data, during and after frame removal, thus indicating that postoperative wound pain caused them more discomfort after frame removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMLA when applied 60 min before frame removal has an anesthetic effect of reducing the postoperative wound pain in patients who undergo GKRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1277229","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1277229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Patients who undergo stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) need a rigid frame fixation for the stereotactic procedures. Many patients suffered from postoperative wound pain after frame removal. The present study investigated whether an additional application of a topical anesthetic prior to frame removal could reduce this discomfort.

Patients and methods: 60 patients who underwent GKRS were enrolled in this study. Of these 60 patients, 30 were treated with a topical application of EMLA, a eutectic mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine; the remaining 30 were treated with a placebo. The nurses explained the definition of the visual analogue scale (VAS, scored from 0 to 10), and the patients evaluated their pain at 7 time points during the GKRS procedure by using the VAS. After each of these evaluations, the patients' vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate) were measured.

Results: There was no significant difference in the patients' age, gender, duration of frame fixation, and types of the lesions between the EMLA and placebo groups. The EMLA group reported significantly lower pain scores 20 and 60 min after frame removal than the placebo group (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Additionally, patients in the placebo group had significantly higher blood pressure readings compared with baseline data, during and after frame removal, thus indicating that postoperative wound pain caused them more discomfort after frame removal.

Conclusion: EMLA when applied 60 min before frame removal has an anesthetic effect of reducing the postoperative wound pain in patients who undergo GKRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面麻醉EMLA治疗立体定向伽玛刀放射外科术后伤口疼痛:一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
背景:接受立体定向伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)的患者需要在立体定向手术中使用刚性框架固定。许多患者在取框后出现术后伤口疼痛。本研究调查了是否在框架移除之前额外应用局部麻醉剂可以减少这种不适。患者和方法:60例GKRS患者入组。在这60名患者中,30名患者接受局部应用EMLA治疗,EMLA是2.5%利多卡因和2.5%丙罗卡因的共溶混合物;其余30人接受安慰剂治疗。护士解释视觉模拟评分(VAS)的定义,评分从0到10分,患者使用VAS评估GKRS手术过程中7个时间点的疼痛。每次评估后,测量患者的生命体征(血压、心率和呼吸频率)。结果:EMLA组与安慰剂组在患者的年龄、性别、框架固定时间、病变类型等方面无显著差异。EMLA组在移除框架后20和60分钟的疼痛评分明显低于安慰剂组(p=0.001和p)。结论:EMLA在移除框架前60分钟应用具有减轻GKRS患者术后伤口疼痛的麻醉作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vidian nerve neurofibroma removed via a transpterygoid approach. Dual, minimally invasive fixation in acute, double, thoracic spine fracture. Massive swelling of Surgicel® Fibrillar™ hemostat after spinal surgery. Case report and a review of the literature. Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks in the postero-superior wall of the frontal sinus - report of 2 cases. Combined staged endoscopic and microsurgical approach of a third ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in an infant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1