A Single-Center Review of Prescribing Trends and Outcomes of Corticosteroid Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Children with Septic Shock.

Scott T Benken, Tamara K Hutson, Rhonda L Gardiner, Derek S Wheeler
{"title":"A Single-Center Review of Prescribing Trends and Outcomes of Corticosteroid Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Children with Septic Shock.","authors":"Scott T Benken,&nbsp;Tamara K Hutson,&nbsp;Rhonda L Gardiner,&nbsp;Derek S Wheeler","doi":"10.2174/1874828701003010051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently published consensus treatment guidelines for pediatric sepsis recommend initiating corticosteroid replacement therapy (CRT) for those critically ill children with adrenal insufficiency and refractory shock. The data to support this recommendation is limited, and multiple studies have demonstrated significant variation in both the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal insufficiency and refractory shock in children. In order to better define the variation in practice at our institution, we retrospectively reviewed the experience with CRT in critically ill children with refractory septic shock over a 1-year-period. In addition, as a secondary aim we compared outcomes in critically ill children treated with CRT for variable lengths of time. We found that the initiation of CRT at our center is relatively consistent. However, we noted significant variation in the duration of CRT and whether CRT was gradually tapered or stopped abruptly. The majority of the patients in our cohort received less than the currently recommended duration of 7 days of CRT. There were a higher number of treatment failures in those patients who received CRT for greater than 7 days, suggesting that CRT should be tapered gradually in these patients. There is significant variation in prescribing trends for CRT at our institution, which are likely to be compounded in any multi-center cohort study of CRT in critically ill children with septic shock. Practice variation in CRT should be standardized to address the impact of CRT in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":88750,"journal":{"name":"The open critical care medicine journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3111024/pdf/nihms-300453.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open critical care medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874828701003010051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Recently published consensus treatment guidelines for pediatric sepsis recommend initiating corticosteroid replacement therapy (CRT) for those critically ill children with adrenal insufficiency and refractory shock. The data to support this recommendation is limited, and multiple studies have demonstrated significant variation in both the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal insufficiency and refractory shock in children. In order to better define the variation in practice at our institution, we retrospectively reviewed the experience with CRT in critically ill children with refractory septic shock over a 1-year-period. In addition, as a secondary aim we compared outcomes in critically ill children treated with CRT for variable lengths of time. We found that the initiation of CRT at our center is relatively consistent. However, we noted significant variation in the duration of CRT and whether CRT was gradually tapered or stopped abruptly. The majority of the patients in our cohort received less than the currently recommended duration of 7 days of CRT. There were a higher number of treatment failures in those patients who received CRT for greater than 7 days, suggesting that CRT should be tapered gradually in these patients. There is significant variation in prescribing trends for CRT at our institution, which are likely to be compounded in any multi-center cohort study of CRT in critically ill children with septic shock. Practice variation in CRT should be standardized to address the impact of CRT in this population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症感染性休克患儿皮质类固醇替代治疗的处方趋势和结果的单中心综述。
最近出版的儿科脓毒症共识治疗指南推荐对肾上腺功能不全和难治性休克的危重儿童启动皮质类固醇替代疗法(CRT)。支持这一建议的数据有限,多项研究表明,儿童肾上腺功能不全和难治性休克的诊断和治疗存在显著差异。为了更好地定义我们机构实践中的变化,我们回顾性地回顾了1年来顽固性脓毒性休克危重儿童的CRT治疗经验。此外,作为次要目的,我们比较了用CRT治疗不同时间长度的危重儿童的结果。我们发现我们中心的CRT起始是相对一致的。然而,我们注意到CRT持续时间的显著差异,以及CRT是逐渐减少还是突然停止。我们队列中的大多数患者接受的CRT治疗时间少于目前推荐的7天。在接受CRT治疗超过7天的患者中,治疗失败率较高,提示这些患者应逐渐减少CRT治疗。在我们的机构中,CRT的处方趋势存在显著差异,这可能会在任何多中心队列研究中加重对脓毒性休克重症儿童的CRT。CRT的实践变化应标准化,以解决CRT对这一人群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insulin Adsorption to Catheter Materials Used for Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Polyethylene Versus Polyurethane - Possible Cause of Variation in Glucose Control? § Sleep and the ICU Update on Sedation in the Critical Care Unit Blood Pressure Control in Neurological ICU Patients: What is Too High and What is Too Low? A Typical Neurological Presentations in the ICU: Limbic Encephalitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1