Early outcome and blood-brain barrier integrity after co-administered thrombolysis and hyperbaric oxygenation in experimental stroke.

Dominik Michalski, Johann Pelz, Christopher Weise, Johannes Kacza, Johannes Boltze, Jens Grosche, Manja Kamprad, Dietmar Schneider, Carsten Hobohm, Wolfgang Härtig
{"title":"Early outcome and blood-brain barrier integrity after co-administered thrombolysis and hyperbaric oxygenation in experimental stroke.","authors":"Dominik Michalski,&nbsp;Johann Pelz,&nbsp;Christopher Weise,&nbsp;Johannes Kacza,&nbsp;Johannes Boltze,&nbsp;Jens Grosche,&nbsp;Manja Kamprad,&nbsp;Dietmar Schneider,&nbsp;Carsten Hobohm,&nbsp;Wolfgang Härtig","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-3-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After promising results in experimental stroke, normobaric (NBO) or hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) have recently been discussed as co-medication with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for improving outcome. This study assessed the interactions of hyperoxia and tPA, focusing on survival, early functional outcome and blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity following experimental stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rats (n = 109) underwent embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion or sham surgery. Animals were assigned to: Control, NBO (60-minute pure oxygen), HBO (60-minute pure oxygen at 2.4 absolute atmospheres), tPA, or HBO+tPA. Functional impairment was assessed at 4 and 24 hours using Menzies score, followed by intravenous application of FITC-albumin as a BBB permeability marker, which was allowed to circulate for 1 hour. Further, blood sampling was performed at 5 and 25 hours for MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups, whereas functional improvement was found for NBO, tPA and HBO+tPA. NBO and HBO tended to stabilize BBB and to reduce MMP-2. tPA tended to increase BBB permeability with corresponding MMP and TIMP elevation. Co-administered HBO failed to attenuate these early deleterious effects, independent of functional improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The long-term consequences of simultaneously applied tPA and both NBO and HBO need to be addressed by further studies to identify therapeutic potencies in acute stroke, and to avoid unfavorable courses following combined treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-3-5","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-3-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: After promising results in experimental stroke, normobaric (NBO) or hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) have recently been discussed as co-medication with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for improving outcome. This study assessed the interactions of hyperoxia and tPA, focusing on survival, early functional outcome and blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity following experimental stroke.

Methods: Rats (n = 109) underwent embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion or sham surgery. Animals were assigned to: Control, NBO (60-minute pure oxygen), HBO (60-minute pure oxygen at 2.4 absolute atmospheres), tPA, or HBO+tPA. Functional impairment was assessed at 4 and 24 hours using Menzies score, followed by intravenous application of FITC-albumin as a BBB permeability marker, which was allowed to circulate for 1 hour. Further, blood sampling was performed at 5 and 25 hours for MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 concentration.

Results: Mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups, whereas functional improvement was found for NBO, tPA and HBO+tPA. NBO and HBO tended to stabilize BBB and to reduce MMP-2. tPA tended to increase BBB permeability with corresponding MMP and TIMP elevation. Co-administered HBO failed to attenuate these early deleterious effects, independent of functional improvement.

Conclusions: The long-term consequences of simultaneously applied tPA and both NBO and HBO need to be addressed by further studies to identify therapeutic potencies in acute stroke, and to avoid unfavorable courses following combined treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验性脑卒中合并溶栓和高压氧治疗后的早期预后和血脑屏障完整性。
背景:在实验性脑卒中治疗中取得良好结果后,正压氧合(NBO)或高压氧合(HBO)最近被讨论与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)联合用药以改善预后。本研究评估了高氧和tPA的相互作用,重点关注实验性脑卒中后的生存、早期功能结局和血脑屏障(BBB)完整性。方法:109只大鼠采用栓塞性大脑中动脉闭塞或假手术治疗。动物被分配到:对照组、NBO(60分钟纯氧)、HBO(2.4绝对大气压下60分钟纯氧)、tPA或HBO+tPA。在第4和24小时使用Menzies评分评估功能损害,然后静脉应用fitc -白蛋白作为血脑屏障通透性标志物,允许循环1小时。此外,在5和25小时采血检测MMP-2、MMP-9、TIMP-1和TIMP-2浓度。结果:两组之间的死亡率无显著差异,而NBO、tPA和HBO+tPA组的功能有所改善。NBO和HBO倾向于稳定血脑屏障,降低MMP-2。tPA倾向于增加血脑屏障通透性,相应的MMP和TIMP升高。联合给药HBO未能减轻这些早期有害影响,独立于功能改善。结论:tPA与NBO和HBO同时应用的长期后果需要进一步研究,以确定急性卒中的治疗效力,并避免联合治疗后的不良病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypoxia after stroke: a review of experimental and clinical evidence Therapeutic potential of the renin angiotensin system in ischaemic stroke Pathophysiology and management of reperfusion injury and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. A pilot study evaluating the use of ABCD2 score in pre-hospital assessment of patients with suspected transient ischaemic attack: experience and lessons learned. Erratum to: Artery reopening is required for the neurorestorative effects of angiotensin modulation after experimental stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1