Developing cessation interventions for the social and community service setting: a qualitative study of barriers to quitting among disadvantaged Australian smokers.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2011-06-24 DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-11-493
Jamie Bryant, Billie Bonevski, Christine Paul, Jon O'Brien, Wendy Oakes
{"title":"Developing cessation interventions for the social and community service setting: a qualitative study of barriers to quitting among disadvantaged Australian smokers.","authors":"Jamie Bryant,&nbsp;Billie Bonevski,&nbsp;Christine Paul,&nbsp;Jon O'Brien,&nbsp;Wendy Oakes","doi":"10.1186/1471-2458-11-493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking rates remain unacceptably high among individuals who are socially disadvantaged. Social and community service organisations (SCSO) are increasingly interested in providing smoking cessation support to clients, however little is known about the best way to assist disadvantaged smokers to quit in this setting. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to quitting within the conceptual framework of the PRECEDE model to identify possible interventions appropriate to the social and community service setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with clients attending five community welfare organisations located in New South Wales, Australia. Thirty-two clients participated in six focus groups. A discussion guide was used to explore the barriers and facilitators to smoking and smoking cessation including: current smoking behaviour, motivation to quit, past quit attempts, barriers to quitting and preferences for cessation support. Focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were current smokers and most expressed a desire to quit. Factors predisposing continued smoking included perceived benefits of smoking for stress relief, doubting of ability to quit, fear of gaining weight, and poor knowledge and scepticism about available quit support. The high cost of nicotine replacement therapy was a barrier to its use. Continual exposure to smoking in personal relationships and in the community reinforced smoking. Participants expressed a strong preference for personalised quit support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disadvantaged smokers in Australia express a desire to quit smoking, but find quitting difficult for a number of reasons. SCSOs may have a role in providing information about the availability of quit support, engaging disadvantaged smokers with available quit support, and providing personalised, ongoing support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1471-2458-11-493","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-493","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Background: Smoking rates remain unacceptably high among individuals who are socially disadvantaged. Social and community service organisations (SCSO) are increasingly interested in providing smoking cessation support to clients, however little is known about the best way to assist disadvantaged smokers to quit in this setting. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to quitting within the conceptual framework of the PRECEDE model to identify possible interventions appropriate to the social and community service setting.

Methods: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with clients attending five community welfare organisations located in New South Wales, Australia. Thirty-two clients participated in six focus groups. A discussion guide was used to explore the barriers and facilitators to smoking and smoking cessation including: current smoking behaviour, motivation to quit, past quit attempts, barriers to quitting and preferences for cessation support. Focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis techniques.

Results: Participants were current smokers and most expressed a desire to quit. Factors predisposing continued smoking included perceived benefits of smoking for stress relief, doubting of ability to quit, fear of gaining weight, and poor knowledge and scepticism about available quit support. The high cost of nicotine replacement therapy was a barrier to its use. Continual exposure to smoking in personal relationships and in the community reinforced smoking. Participants expressed a strong preference for personalised quit support.

Conclusions: Disadvantaged smokers in Australia express a desire to quit smoking, but find quitting difficult for a number of reasons. SCSOs may have a role in providing information about the availability of quit support, engaging disadvantaged smokers with available quit support, and providing personalised, ongoing support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为社会和社区服务环境制定戒烟干预措施:对澳大利亚弱势吸烟者戒烟障碍的定性研究。
背景:在社会弱势群体中,吸烟率仍然高得令人无法接受。社会和社区服务组织(SCSO)越来越有兴趣为客户提供戒烟支持,然而,在这种情况下,人们对帮助弱势吸烟者戒烟的最佳方式知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨在pre模型的概念框架内戒烟的障碍和促进因素,以确定适合社会和社区服务环境的可能干预措施。方法:对澳大利亚新南威尔士州五个社区福利机构的客户进行半结构化焦点小组调查。32名客户参加了6个焦点小组。一份讨论指南用于探讨吸烟和戒烟的障碍和促进因素,包括:目前的吸烟行为、戒烟的动机、过去的戒烟尝试、戒烟的障碍和戒烟支持的偏好。对焦点小组进行录音、转录并使用专题分析技术进行分析。结果:参与者都是目前的吸烟者,大多数人都表达了戒烟的愿望。导致持续吸烟的因素包括:认为吸烟可以缓解压力、怀疑戒烟的能力、担心体重增加、对戒烟支持的缺乏了解和怀疑。尼古丁替代疗法的高成本是其使用的一个障碍。在人际关系和社区中持续接触吸烟会加剧吸烟。参加者强烈倾向于个人化的戒烟支持。结论:澳大利亚的弱势吸烟者表达了戒烟的愿望,但由于一些原因发现戒烟困难。社会服务组织可能在提供有关可获得的戒烟支持的信息,使弱势吸烟者获得可获得的戒烟支持以及提供个性化的持续支持方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Prospective associations between Long COVID and mental health: evidence from a population-based study with a nearly three-year follow-up. The role of third-party e-commerce technology in illegal online e-cigarette sales. Socioeconomic and cultural correlates of illicit alcohol consumption among patrons in Uganda: a mixed-methods approach. The effects of peer health education on alcohol consumption behaviour among university students in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Colorectal cancer risk: stereotypical assumptions and competing values - a qualitative study with the general public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1