Medication Reconciliation: Identifying Medication Discrepancies in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Older Adults

Diane Villanyi BSc Pharm, MD, FRCPC, Mark Fok BSc Pharm, MD, Roger Y.M. Wong BMSc, MD, FRCPC, FACP
{"title":"Medication Reconciliation: Identifying Medication Discrepancies in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Older Adults","authors":"Diane Villanyi BSc Pharm, MD, FRCPC,&nbsp;Mark Fok BSc Pharm, MD,&nbsp;Roger Y.M. Wong BMSc, MD, FRCPC, FACP","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Medication discrepancies may occur during transitions from community to acute care hospitals. The elderly are at risk for such discrepancies due to multiple comorbidities and complex medication regimens. Medication reconciliation involves verifying medication use and identifying and rectifying discrepancies.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to describe the prevalences and types of medication discrepancies in acutely ill older patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who were ≥70 years and were admitted to any of 3 acute care for elders (ACE) units over a period of 2 nonconsecutive months in 2008 were prospectively enrolled. Medication discrepancies were classified as intentional, undocumented intentional, and unintentional. Unintentional medication discrepancies were classified by a blinded rater for potential to harm. This study was primarily qualitative, and descriptive (univariate) statistics are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-seven patients (42 women; mean [SD] age, 84.0 [6.5] years) were enrolled. There were 37 unintentional prescription-medication discrepancies in 27 patients (40.3%) and 43 unintentional over-the-counter (OTC) medication discrepancies in 19 patients (28.4%), which translates to Medication Reconciliation Success Index (MRSI) of 89% for prescription medications and 59% for OTC medications. The overall MRSI was 83%. More than half of the prescription-medication discrepancies (56.8%) were classified as potentially causing moderate/severe discomfort or clinical deterioration.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite a fairly high overall MRSI in these patients admitted to ACE units, a substantial proportion of the prescription-medication discrepancies were associated with potential harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"9 5","pages":"Pages 339-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.07.005","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594611001218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Background

Medication discrepancies may occur during transitions from community to acute care hospitals. The elderly are at risk for such discrepancies due to multiple comorbidities and complex medication regimens. Medication reconciliation involves verifying medication use and identifying and rectifying discrepancies.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the prevalences and types of medication discrepancies in acutely ill older patients.

Methods

Patients who were ≥70 years and were admitted to any of 3 acute care for elders (ACE) units over a period of 2 nonconsecutive months in 2008 were prospectively enrolled. Medication discrepancies were classified as intentional, undocumented intentional, and unintentional. Unintentional medication discrepancies were classified by a blinded rater for potential to harm. This study was primarily qualitative, and descriptive (univariate) statistics are presented.

Results

Sixty-seven patients (42 women; mean [SD] age, 84.0 [6.5] years) were enrolled. There were 37 unintentional prescription-medication discrepancies in 27 patients (40.3%) and 43 unintentional over-the-counter (OTC) medication discrepancies in 19 patients (28.4%), which translates to Medication Reconciliation Success Index (MRSI) of 89% for prescription medications and 59% for OTC medications. The overall MRSI was 83%. More than half of the prescription-medication discrepancies (56.8%) were classified as potentially causing moderate/severe discomfort or clinical deterioration.

Conclusion

Despite a fairly high overall MRSI in these patients admitted to ACE units, a substantial proportion of the prescription-medication discrepancies were associated with potential harm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物调解:识别急病住院老年人的药物差异
背景:从社区医院到急症护理医院的过渡过程中可能出现用药差异。由于多种合并症和复杂的药物治疗方案,老年人面临这种差异的风险。药物对账包括验证药物使用,识别和纠正差异。目的探讨老年急性病患者用药差异的发生率和类型。方法前瞻性入选年龄≥70岁,在2008年非连续2个月内入住3个老年人急性护理(ACE)病房的患者。用药差异分为故意、未记录的故意和非故意。无意用药差异由盲法评分者根据潜在危害进行分类。本研究主要是定性的,并提出了描述性(单变量)统计。结果67例患者(女性42例;平均[SD]年龄,84.0[6.5]岁)。27例患者(40.3%)存在37项非故意处方用药差异,19例患者(28.4%)存在43项非故意非处方(OTC)用药差异,即处方药的药物和解成功指数(MRSI)为89%,非处方药物为59%。总体MRSI为83%。超过一半的处方用药差异(56.8%)被归类为可能导致中度/重度不适或临床恶化。结论:尽管在ACE住院的这些患者中有相当高的总体MRSI,但很大一部分处方用药差异与潜在危害有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1