The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2010: Mind the Gap.

Computing in cardiology Pub Date : 2010-09-01
George B Moody
{"title":"The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2010: Mind the Gap.","authors":"George B Moody","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participants in the 11th annual PhysioNet/CinC Challenge were asked to reconstruct, using any combination of available prior and concurrent information, 30-second segments of ECG, continuous blood pressure waveforms, respiration, and other signals that had been removed from recordings of patients in intensive care units.Fifteen of the 53 participants provided reconstructions for the entire test set of 100 ten-minute recordings. The mean correlation between the segments that had been removed (the \"target signals\") and the reconstructions produced using the two most successful methods is 0.9, and the sum of the squared residual errors in these reconstructions is less than 20% of the energy of the target signals.Sources for the most successful methods developed for this challenge have been made available by their authors to support research on robust estimation of parameters derived from unreliable signals, detection of changes in patient state, and recognition of signal corruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":72683,"journal":{"name":"Computing in cardiology","volume":"37 ","pages":"305-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136865/pdf/nihms299861.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing in cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participants in the 11th annual PhysioNet/CinC Challenge were asked to reconstruct, using any combination of available prior and concurrent information, 30-second segments of ECG, continuous blood pressure waveforms, respiration, and other signals that had been removed from recordings of patients in intensive care units.Fifteen of the 53 participants provided reconstructions for the entire test set of 100 ten-minute recordings. The mean correlation between the segments that had been removed (the "target signals") and the reconstructions produced using the two most successful methods is 0.9, and the sum of the squared residual errors in these reconstructions is less than 20% of the energy of the target signals.Sources for the most successful methods developed for this challenge have been made available by their authors to support research on robust estimation of parameters derived from unreliable signals, detection of changes in patient state, and recognition of signal corruption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理网络/计算在心脏病学挑战2010:注意差距。
第11届年度PhysioNet/CinC挑战赛的参与者被要求使用任何可用的先前和并发信息的组合,重建30秒的心电图片段,连续的血压波形,呼吸和其他从重症监护病房患者的记录中删除的信号。53名参与者中有15人提供了100个10分钟录音的整个测试集的重建。被移除的部分(“目标信号”)与使用两种最成功的方法产生的重建之间的平均相关性为0.9,这些重建中的残差平方和小于目标信号能量的20%。为应对这一挑战而开发的最成功方法的来源已经由他们的作者提供,以支持对来自不可靠信号的参数进行鲁棒估计、检测患者状态变化和识别信号损坏的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transfer Learning for Improved Classification of Drivers in Atrial Fibrillation. Effects of Biventricular Pacing Locations on Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Success in a Patient-Specific Model. Deep Learning System for Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidate Assessment from Electrocardiograms. Capturing the Influence of Conduction Velocity on Epicardial Activation Patterns Using Uncertainty Quantification. Comparison of Machine Learning Detection of Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Individual ECG Leads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1