Intake of Milk with Added Micronutrients Increases the Effectiveness of an Energy-Restricted Diet to Reduce Body Weight: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Mexican Women

Jorge L. Rosado PhD, Olga P. Garcia PhD, Dolores Ronquillo, Deisy Hervert-Hernández MS, Maria del C. Caamaño MA, Guadalupe Martínez MHN, Jessica Gutiérrez, Sandra García MS
{"title":"Intake of Milk with Added Micronutrients Increases the Effectiveness of an Energy-Restricted Diet to Reduce Body Weight: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in Mexican Women","authors":"Jorge L. Rosado PhD,&nbsp;Olga P. Garcia PhD,&nbsp;Dolores Ronquillo,&nbsp;Deisy Hervert-Hernández MS,&nbsp;Maria del C. Caamaño MA,&nbsp;Guadalupe Martínez MHN,&nbsp;Jessica Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Sandra García MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Micronutrient deficiencies have been associated with an increase in fat deposition and body weight; thus, adding them to low-fat milk may facilitate weight loss when accompanied by an energy-restricted diet.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to evaluate the effect of the intake of low-fat milk and low-fat milk with added micronutrients on anthropometrics, body composition, blood glucose levels, lipids profile, C-reactive protein, and blood pressure of women following an energy-restricted diet.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A 16-week randomized, controlled intervention study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants/settings</h3><p>One hundred thirty-nine obese women (aged 34±6 years) from five rural communities in Querétaro, Mexico.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Women followed an energy-restricted diet (−500 kcal) and received in addition one of the following treatments: 250 mL of low-fat milk (LFM) three times/day, 250 mL of low-fat milk with micronutrients (LFM+M) three times/day, or a no milk control group (CON). Weight, height, and hip and waist circumferences were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. Body composition measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood pressure, and blood analysis were done at baseline and at the end of the 16 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Changes in weight and body composition.</p></div><div><h3>Statistical analysis</h3><p>One-factor analysis of variance, adjusted by age, baseline values, and community random effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the 16-week intervention, participants in the LFM+M group lost significantly more weight (−5.1 kg; 95% CI: −6.2 to −4.1) compared with LFM (−3.6 kg; 95% CI: −4.7 to −2.6) and CON (−3.2 kg; 95% CI: −4.3 to −2.2) group members (<em>P</em>=0.035). Body mass index change in the LFM+M group (−2.3; 95% CI: −2.7 to −1.8) was significantly greater than LFM group members (−1.5; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.1) and CON group members (−1.4; 95% CI: −1.9 to −0.9) (<em>P</em>=0.022). Change in percent body fat among LFM+M group members (−2.7%; 95% CI: −3.2 to −2.1) was significantly higher than LFM group members (−1.8%; 95% CI: −2.3 to −1.3) and CON group members (−1.6%; 95% CI: −2.2 to −1.0) (<em>P</em>=0.019). Change in bone mineral content was significantly higher in LFM group members (29 mg; 95% CI: 15 to 44) and LFM+M group members (27 mg; 95% CI: 13 to 41) compared with CON group members (−2 mg; 95% CI: −17 to −14) (<em>P</em>=0.007). No differences were found between groups in glucose level, blood lipid profile, C-reactive protein level, or blood pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intake of LFM+M increases the effectiveness of an energy-restricted diet to treat obesity, but had no effect on blood lipid levels, glucose levels, C-reactive protein, or blood pressure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.011","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311012181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Background

Micronutrient deficiencies have been associated with an increase in fat deposition and body weight; thus, adding them to low-fat milk may facilitate weight loss when accompanied by an energy-restricted diet.

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the effect of the intake of low-fat milk and low-fat milk with added micronutrients on anthropometrics, body composition, blood glucose levels, lipids profile, C-reactive protein, and blood pressure of women following an energy-restricted diet.

Design

A 16-week randomized, controlled intervention study.

Participants/settings

One hundred thirty-nine obese women (aged 34±6 years) from five rural communities in Querétaro, Mexico.

Intervention

Women followed an energy-restricted diet (−500 kcal) and received in addition one of the following treatments: 250 mL of low-fat milk (LFM) three times/day, 250 mL of low-fat milk with micronutrients (LFM+M) three times/day, or a no milk control group (CON). Weight, height, and hip and waist circumferences were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. Body composition measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood pressure, and blood analysis were done at baseline and at the end of the 16 weeks.

Main outcome measures

Changes in weight and body composition.

Statistical analysis

One-factor analysis of variance, adjusted by age, baseline values, and community random effects.

Results

After the 16-week intervention, participants in the LFM+M group lost significantly more weight (−5.1 kg; 95% CI: −6.2 to −4.1) compared with LFM (−3.6 kg; 95% CI: −4.7 to −2.6) and CON (−3.2 kg; 95% CI: −4.3 to −2.2) group members (P=0.035). Body mass index change in the LFM+M group (−2.3; 95% CI: −2.7 to −1.8) was significantly greater than LFM group members (−1.5; 95% CI: −2.0 to −1.1) and CON group members (−1.4; 95% CI: −1.9 to −0.9) (P=0.022). Change in percent body fat among LFM+M group members (−2.7%; 95% CI: −3.2 to −2.1) was significantly higher than LFM group members (−1.8%; 95% CI: −2.3 to −1.3) and CON group members (−1.6%; 95% CI: −2.2 to −1.0) (P=0.019). Change in bone mineral content was significantly higher in LFM group members (29 mg; 95% CI: 15 to 44) and LFM+M group members (27 mg; 95% CI: 13 to 41) compared with CON group members (−2 mg; 95% CI: −17 to −14) (P=0.007). No differences were found between groups in glucose level, blood lipid profile, C-reactive protein level, or blood pressure.

Conclusions

Intake of LFM+M increases the effectiveness of an energy-restricted diet to treat obesity, but had no effect on blood lipid levels, glucose levels, C-reactive protein, or blood pressure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在墨西哥妇女中进行的一项随机对照临床试验:摄入添加微量营养素的牛奶增加了能量限制饮食减轻体重的有效性
微量营养素缺乏与脂肪沉积和体重增加有关;因此,将它们添加到低脂牛奶中,并辅以限制能量的饮食,可能有助于减肥。目的评估摄入低脂牛奶和添加微量营养素的低脂牛奶对限制能量饮食的妇女的人体测量学、身体成分、血糖水平、血脂谱、c反应蛋白和血压的影响。DesignA一项为期16周的随机对照干预研究。参与者/环境来自墨西哥querimastaro五个农村社区的139名肥胖妇女(年龄34±6岁)。干预妇女遵循能量限制饮食(- 500千卡),并接受以下治疗之一:250毫升低脂牛奶(LFM)每天三次,250毫升低脂牛奶与微量营养素(LFM+M)每天三次,或无牛奶对照组(CON)。在基线和每4周测量一次体重、身高、臀围和腰围。在基线和16周结束时,通过双能x线吸收仪测量身体成分、血压和血液分析。主要结果测量:体重和身体成分的变化。统计分析单因素方差分析,根据年龄、基线值和社区随机效应进行调整。结果经过16周的干预,LFM+M组的参与者体重明显减轻(- 5.1 kg;95% CI:−6.2至−4.1),与LFM相比(−3.6 kg;95% CI:−4.7至−2.6)和CON(−3.2 kg;95% CI:−4.3 ~−2.2)组成员(P=0.035)。LFM+M组体重指数变化(- 2.3;95% CI:−2.7至−1.8)显著大于LFM组成员(−1.5;95% CI:−2.0至−1.1)和CON组成员(−1.4;95% CI:−1.9 ~−0.9)(P=0.022)。LFM+M组成员体脂百分比变化(- 2.7%;95% CI:−3.2至−2.1)显著高于LFM组成员(−1.8%;95% CI:−2.3至−1.3)和CON组成员(−1.6%;95% CI:−2.2 ~−1.0)(P=0.019)。LFM组骨矿物质含量变化显著高于对照组(29 mg;95% CI: 15 ~ 44)和LFM+M组成员(27 mg;95% CI: 13 ~ 41)与CON组相比(−2 mg;95% CI:−17 ~−14)(P=0.007)。两组之间的血糖水平、血脂水平、c反应蛋白水平或血压均无差异。结论:服用LFM+M增加了能量限制饮食治疗肥胖的有效性,但对血脂水平、血糖水平、c反应蛋白或血压没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Infant Feeding Practices What about corn oil? Program Outline Overweight Children Good reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1