Validation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for confirmation of array comparative genomic hybridization.

Lawrence J Jennings, Min Yu, Carrie Fitzpatrick, Frederick A Smith
{"title":"Validation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for confirmation of array comparative genomic hybridization.","authors":"Lawrence J Jennings,&nbsp;Min Yu,&nbsp;Carrie Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;Frederick A Smith","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American College of Medical Genetics recommends that each laboratory should confirm abnormal or ambiguous results detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). At present, the gold standard method for aCGH confirmation is fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH is not well suited for small tandem duplications or very small deletions that are detectable by oligonucleotide arrays. Therefore, we developed and validated multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for aCGH confirmation. The method performance validation showed linearity through the expected analytical measurement range (0.05 to 2 genome equivalents). The interassay normalized coefficient of variation averaged 3.7% across 12 control and target probes. This low imprecision allowed detection of 20% mosaicism with exceptional confidence (P<0.006). Comparison with a combined gold standard of phenotype, aCGH, karyotype, and/ or FISH showed 100% concordance for 218 samples using an X/Y chromosome-specific probe set (95% confidence interval, 98.3%-100.0%). Patient-specific probe sets also showed 100% concordance to the gold standard for 18 genomic targets. In conclusion, we have developed and validated an MLPA assay using a novel approach to accommodate the fact that positive controls would not be available at the time of testing. We initially validated the MLPA method using X/Y chromosome-specific probes and well-characterized samples and then validated new probe sets by comparision with reference populations. We have successfully incorporated aCGH confirmation using custom-designed MLPA into our normal workflow, and used it for confirmation of all abnormal or ambiguous results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"20 3","pages":"166-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The American College of Medical Genetics recommends that each laboratory should confirm abnormal or ambiguous results detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). At present, the gold standard method for aCGH confirmation is fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH is not well suited for small tandem duplications or very small deletions that are detectable by oligonucleotide arrays. Therefore, we developed and validated multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for aCGH confirmation. The method performance validation showed linearity through the expected analytical measurement range (0.05 to 2 genome equivalents). The interassay normalized coefficient of variation averaged 3.7% across 12 control and target probes. This low imprecision allowed detection of 20% mosaicism with exceptional confidence (P<0.006). Comparison with a combined gold standard of phenotype, aCGH, karyotype, and/ or FISH showed 100% concordance for 218 samples using an X/Y chromosome-specific probe set (95% confidence interval, 98.3%-100.0%). Patient-specific probe sets also showed 100% concordance to the gold standard for 18 genomic targets. In conclusion, we have developed and validated an MLPA assay using a novel approach to accommodate the fact that positive controls would not be available at the time of testing. We initially validated the MLPA method using X/Y chromosome-specific probes and well-characterized samples and then validated new probe sets by comparision with reference populations. We have successfully incorporated aCGH confirmation using custom-designed MLPA into our normal workflow, and used it for confirmation of all abnormal or ambiguous results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重连接依赖探针扩增确认阵列比较基因组杂交。
美国医学遗传学学院建议每个实验室应确认阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)检测到的异常或模糊结果。目前,确认aCGH的金标准方法是荧光原位杂交(FISH)。然而,FISH并不适合于小的串联重复或非常小的缺失,可以通过寡核苷酸阵列检测到。因此,我们开发并验证了用于aCGH确认的多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)。在预期的分析测量范围(0.05 ~ 2个基因组当量)内,该方法性能验证呈线性。12个对照和靶探针的测定间归一化变异系数平均为3.7%。这种低不精度允许检测20%的马赛克具有特殊的信心(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
Index Molecular Testing for Respiratory Viruses Molecular Testing in Emerging Infectious Diseases Frequent PIK3CA mutations in radial scars. Pyrosequencing for EGFR mutation detection: diagnostic accuracy and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1