Lawrence J Jennings, Min Yu, Carrie Fitzpatrick, Frederick A Smith
{"title":"Validation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for confirmation of array comparative genomic hybridization.","authors":"Lawrence J Jennings, Min Yu, Carrie Fitzpatrick, Frederick A Smith","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American College of Medical Genetics recommends that each laboratory should confirm abnormal or ambiguous results detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). At present, the gold standard method for aCGH confirmation is fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH is not well suited for small tandem duplications or very small deletions that are detectable by oligonucleotide arrays. Therefore, we developed and validated multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for aCGH confirmation. The method performance validation showed linearity through the expected analytical measurement range (0.05 to 2 genome equivalents). The interassay normalized coefficient of variation averaged 3.7% across 12 control and target probes. This low imprecision allowed detection of 20% mosaicism with exceptional confidence (P<0.006). Comparison with a combined gold standard of phenotype, aCGH, karyotype, and/ or FISH showed 100% concordance for 218 samples using an X/Y chromosome-specific probe set (95% confidence interval, 98.3%-100.0%). Patient-specific probe sets also showed 100% concordance to the gold standard for 18 genomic targets. In conclusion, we have developed and validated an MLPA assay using a novel approach to accommodate the fact that positive controls would not be available at the time of testing. We initially validated the MLPA method using X/Y chromosome-specific probes and well-characterized samples and then validated new probe sets by comparision with reference populations. We have successfully incorporated aCGH confirmation using custom-designed MLPA into our normal workflow, and used it for confirmation of all abnormal or ambiguous results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"20 3","pages":"166-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820b2517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics recommends that each laboratory should confirm abnormal or ambiguous results detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). At present, the gold standard method for aCGH confirmation is fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH is not well suited for small tandem duplications or very small deletions that are detectable by oligonucleotide arrays. Therefore, we developed and validated multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for aCGH confirmation. The method performance validation showed linearity through the expected analytical measurement range (0.05 to 2 genome equivalents). The interassay normalized coefficient of variation averaged 3.7% across 12 control and target probes. This low imprecision allowed detection of 20% mosaicism with exceptional confidence (P<0.006). Comparison with a combined gold standard of phenotype, aCGH, karyotype, and/ or FISH showed 100% concordance for 218 samples using an X/Y chromosome-specific probe set (95% confidence interval, 98.3%-100.0%). Patient-specific probe sets also showed 100% concordance to the gold standard for 18 genomic targets. In conclusion, we have developed and validated an MLPA assay using a novel approach to accommodate the fact that positive controls would not be available at the time of testing. We initially validated the MLPA method using X/Y chromosome-specific probes and well-characterized samples and then validated new probe sets by comparision with reference populations. We have successfully incorporated aCGH confirmation using custom-designed MLPA into our normal workflow, and used it for confirmation of all abnormal or ambiguous results.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.