Location, Location, Location: Eye-Tracking Evidence that Consumers Preferentially View Prominently Positioned Nutrition Information

Dan J. Graham PhD, Robert W. Jeffery PhD
{"title":"Location, Location, Location: Eye-Tracking Evidence that Consumers Preferentially View Prominently Positioned Nutrition Information","authors":"Dan J. Graham PhD,&nbsp;Robert W. Jeffery PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nutrition Facts labels can keep consumers better informed about their diets' nutritional composition, however, consumers currently do not understand these labels well or use them often. Thus, modifying existing labels may benefit public health.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study tracked the visual attention of individuals making simulated food-purchasing decisions to assess Nutrition Facts label viewing. Primary research questions were how self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts labels and their components relates to measured viewing and whether locations of labels and specific label components relate to viewing.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study involved a simulated grocery shopping exercise conducted on a computer equipped with an eye-tracking camera. A post-task survey assessed self-reported nutrition information viewing, health behaviors, and demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects/setting</h3><p>Individuals 18 years old and older and capable of reading English words on a computer (n=203) completed the 1-hour protocol at the University of Minnesota during Spring 2010.</p></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses</h3><p>Primary analyses included χ<sup>2</sup>, analysis of variance, and <em>t</em> tests comparing self-reported and measured viewing of label components in different presentation configurations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts label components was higher than objectively measured viewing. Label components at the top of the label were viewed more than those at the bottom, and labels positioned in the center of the screen were viewed more than those located on the sides.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nutrition Facts label position within a viewing area and position of specific components on a label relate to viewing. Eye tracking is a valuable technology for evaluating consumers' attention to nutrition information, informing nutrition labeling policy (eg, front-of-pack labels), and designing labels that best support healthy dietary decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005","citationCount":"140","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311013757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 140

Abstract

Background

Nutrition Facts labels can keep consumers better informed about their diets' nutritional composition, however, consumers currently do not understand these labels well or use them often. Thus, modifying existing labels may benefit public health.

Objective

The present study tracked the visual attention of individuals making simulated food-purchasing decisions to assess Nutrition Facts label viewing. Primary research questions were how self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts labels and their components relates to measured viewing and whether locations of labels and specific label components relate to viewing.

Design

The study involved a simulated grocery shopping exercise conducted on a computer equipped with an eye-tracking camera. A post-task survey assessed self-reported nutrition information viewing, health behaviors, and demographics.

Subjects/setting

Individuals 18 years old and older and capable of reading English words on a computer (n=203) completed the 1-hour protocol at the University of Minnesota during Spring 2010.

Statistical analyses

Primary analyses included χ2, analysis of variance, and t tests comparing self-reported and measured viewing of label components in different presentation configurations.

Results

Self-reported viewing of Nutrition Facts label components was higher than objectively measured viewing. Label components at the top of the label were viewed more than those at the bottom, and labels positioned in the center of the screen were viewed more than those located on the sides.

Conclusions

Nutrition Facts label position within a viewing area and position of specific components on a label relate to viewing. Eye tracking is a valuable technology for evaluating consumers' attention to nutrition information, informing nutrition labeling policy (eg, front-of-pack labels), and designing labels that best support healthy dietary decisions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位置,位置,位置:眼球追踪证据表明消费者更倾向于查看位置突出的营养信息
背景:营养成分标签可以让消费者更好地了解他们饮食中的营养成分,然而,消费者目前并不了解这些标签,也不经常使用它们。因此,修改现有的标签可能有利于公众健康。目的本研究通过追踪个体在进行模拟食品购买决策时的视觉注意力来评估营养成分标签的浏览情况。主要的研究问题是,营养成分标签及其成分的自我报告观看与测量观看的关系,以及标签的位置和特定标签成分是否与观看有关。这项研究包括在一台装有眼球追踪摄像头的电脑上进行模拟的杂货店购物练习。一项任务后调查评估了自我报告的营养信息查看、健康行为和人口统计数据。受试者/设置18岁及以上且能够在电脑上阅读英语单词的个体(n=203)于2010年春季在明尼苏达大学完成了1小时的协议。统计分析:主要分析包括χ2、方差分析和t检验,比较不同呈现配置中自我报告和测量的标签成分观看情况。结果自我报告的营养成分标签浏览率高于客观测量的浏览率。标签顶部的标签组件的浏览量高于底部的标签组件,位于屏幕中央的标签组件的浏览量高于位于屏幕两侧的标签组件。结论营养成分标签在观看区域内的位置和标签上特定成分的位置与观看有关。眼动追踪是一项有价值的技术,可以评估消费者对营养信息的关注程度,为营养标签政策(如包装正面标签)提供信息,并设计最能支持健康饮食决策的标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Infant Feeding Practices What about corn oil? Program Outline Overweight Children Good reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1