Long-term follow-up after radical cystectomy with emphasis on complications and reoperations: a Swedish population-based survey.

Fredrik Liedberg, Erik Holmberg, Sten Holmäng, Börje Ljungberg, Per-Uno Malmström, Wiking Månsson, Leyla Nunez, Catrin Wessman, Hans Wijkström, Staffan Jahnson
{"title":"Long-term follow-up after radical cystectomy with emphasis on complications and reoperations: a Swedish population-based survey.","authors":"Fredrik Liedberg,&nbsp;Erik Holmberg,&nbsp;Sten Holmäng,&nbsp;Börje Ljungberg,&nbsp;Per-Uno Malmström,&nbsp;Wiking Månsson,&nbsp;Leyla Nunez,&nbsp;Catrin Wessman,&nbsp;Hans Wijkström,&nbsp;Staffan Jahnson","doi":"10.3109/00365599.2011.609835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective. To evaluate outcome after radical cystectomy for primary bladder cancer in a large population-based material. Material and methods. Between 1997 and 2002 all patients treated with radical cystectomy within 3 months after diagnosis of primary bladder cancer without distant metastasis were retrieved through the Swedish Bladder Cancer Registry. A follow-up questionnaire was distributed to all units where the primary registration of patients was performed. Follow-up data on recurrence date were retrieved from the patient charts and causes of death were obtained from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry until 2003. Results. During the study period radical cystectomy was performed in 39 units in Sweden, of which only five units were considered high-volume hospitals performing 10 or more procedures annually. Mean blood loss was 2300 ml (median 2000 ml) and the 90-day mortality rate was 5.7%. Blood loss was higher in high-volume units than in hospitals with lower hospital volumes, but the 90-day mortality rates were similar. During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 24% of the patients were submitted to a reoperation. Reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients who received a continent urinary diversion (29%) compared with an ileal conduit (22%, p < 0.015). Conclusions. Radical cystectomy was associated with a reoperation rate of 24% in Sweden during the study period. The reoperation rates were higher in patients receiving a continent cutaneous diversion or bladder substitution. Blood loss was higher in high-volume units; otherwise, surgical volume did not affect mortality rates, cancer-specific survival or reoperation rates.","PeriodicalId":21543,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","volume":"46 1","pages":"14-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365599.2011.609835","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599.2011.609835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Abstract Objective. To evaluate outcome after radical cystectomy for primary bladder cancer in a large population-based material. Material and methods. Between 1997 and 2002 all patients treated with radical cystectomy within 3 months after diagnosis of primary bladder cancer without distant metastasis were retrieved through the Swedish Bladder Cancer Registry. A follow-up questionnaire was distributed to all units where the primary registration of patients was performed. Follow-up data on recurrence date were retrieved from the patient charts and causes of death were obtained from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry until 2003. Results. During the study period radical cystectomy was performed in 39 units in Sweden, of which only five units were considered high-volume hospitals performing 10 or more procedures annually. Mean blood loss was 2300 ml (median 2000 ml) and the 90-day mortality rate was 5.7%. Blood loss was higher in high-volume units than in hospitals with lower hospital volumes, but the 90-day mortality rates were similar. During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 24% of the patients were submitted to a reoperation. Reoperation rates were significantly higher in patients who received a continent urinary diversion (29%) compared with an ileal conduit (22%, p < 0.015). Conclusions. Radical cystectomy was associated with a reoperation rate of 24% in Sweden during the study period. The reoperation rates were higher in patients receiving a continent cutaneous diversion or bladder substitution. Blood loss was higher in high-volume units; otherwise, surgical volume did not affect mortality rates, cancer-specific survival or reoperation rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性膀胱切除术后的长期随访,重点是并发症和再手术:一项基于瑞典人群的调查。
目的:评价原发性膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术后的预后。材料和方法:1997年至2002年间,所有在原发性膀胱癌诊断后3个月内接受根治性膀胱切除术且无远处转移的患者均通过瑞典膀胱癌登记处进行检索。随访问卷被分发到所有进行初次患者登记的单位。从患者图表中检索复发日期的随访数据,并从瑞典死亡原因登记处获得2003年之前的死亡原因。结果:在研究期间,瑞典的39个单位进行了根治性膀胱切除术,其中只有5个单位被认为是每年进行10次或更多手术的大容量医院。平均失血量2300 ml(中位2000 ml), 90天死亡率5.7%。大容量病房的失血量高于小容量医院,但90天死亡率相似。在中位3.5年的随访期间,24%的患者再次接受手术。与回肠导尿管组(22%,p < 0.015)相比,留置导尿管组的再手术率(29%)显著高于留置导尿管组(22%,p < 0.015)。结论:研究期间,瑞典根治性膀胱切除术的再手术率为24%。再手术率较高的患者接受皮肤转移或膀胱替代。大容量单位的失血量较高;此外,手术量不影响死亡率、癌症特异性生存率或再手术率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Implantable neurotechnologies: bidirectional neural interfaces--applications and VLSI circuit implementations. Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy and ureteroureterostomy for retrocaval ureter with ureteral calculus: first case report. Current routines for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a web-based survey by the Swedish Urology Network. Sleep quality and its correlates in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Sexual and relationship functioning before and after renal transplantation: a descriptive study with patients and partners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1