Metabolomic phenotyping of a cloned pig model.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology BMC Physiology Pub Date : 2011-08-22 DOI:10.1186/1472-6793-11-14
Morten R Clausen, Kirstine L Christensen, Mette S Hedemann, Ying Liu, Stig Purup, Mette Schmidt, Henrik Callesen, Jan Stagsted, Hanne C Bertram
{"title":"Metabolomic phenotyping of a cloned pig model.","authors":"Morten R Clausen,&nbsp;Kirstine L Christensen,&nbsp;Mette S Hedemann,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Stig Purup,&nbsp;Mette Schmidt,&nbsp;Henrik Callesen,&nbsp;Jan Stagsted,&nbsp;Hanne C Bertram","doi":"10.1186/1472-6793-11-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pigs are widely used as models for human physiological changes in intervention studies, because of the close resemblance between human and porcine physiology and the high degree of experimental control when using an animal model. Cloned animals have, in principle, identical genotypes and possibly also phenotypes and this offer an extra level of experimental control which could possibly make them a desirable tool for intervention studies. Therefore, in the present study, we address how phenotype and phenotypic variation is affected by cloning, through comparison of cloned pigs and normal outbred pigs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The metabolic phenotype of cloned pigs (n = 5) was for the first time elucidated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomic analysis of multiple bio-fluids including plasma, bile and urine. The metabolic phenotype of the cloned pigs was compared with normal outbred pigs (n = 6) by multivariate data analysis, which revealed differences in the metabolic phenotypes. Plasma lactate was higher for cloned vs control pigs, while multiple metabolites were altered in the bile. However a lower inter-individual variability for cloned pigs compared with control pigs could not be established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the present study we conclude that cloned and normal outbred pigs are phenotypically different. However, it cannot be concluded that the use of cloned animals will reduce the inter-individual variation in intervention studies, though this is based on a limited number of animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":35905,"journal":{"name":"BMC Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6793-11-14","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-11-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Pigs are widely used as models for human physiological changes in intervention studies, because of the close resemblance between human and porcine physiology and the high degree of experimental control when using an animal model. Cloned animals have, in principle, identical genotypes and possibly also phenotypes and this offer an extra level of experimental control which could possibly make them a desirable tool for intervention studies. Therefore, in the present study, we address how phenotype and phenotypic variation is affected by cloning, through comparison of cloned pigs and normal outbred pigs.

Results: The metabolic phenotype of cloned pigs (n = 5) was for the first time elucidated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomic analysis of multiple bio-fluids including plasma, bile and urine. The metabolic phenotype of the cloned pigs was compared with normal outbred pigs (n = 6) by multivariate data analysis, which revealed differences in the metabolic phenotypes. Plasma lactate was higher for cloned vs control pigs, while multiple metabolites were altered in the bile. However a lower inter-individual variability for cloned pigs compared with control pigs could not be established.

Conclusions: From the present study we conclude that cloned and normal outbred pigs are phenotypically different. However, it cannot be concluded that the use of cloned animals will reduce the inter-individual variation in intervention studies, though this is based on a limited number of animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克隆猪模型的代谢组学表型分析。
背景:猪在干预研究中被广泛用作人体生理变化的模型,因为人与猪的生理非常相似,并且在使用动物模型时具有高度的实验控制性。克隆动物原则上具有相同的基因型,也可能具有相同的表型,这提供了额外的实验控制水平,这可能使它们成为干预研究的理想工具。因此,在本研究中,我们通过克隆猪和正常远交种猪的比较,探讨了克隆如何影响表型和表型变异。结果:克隆猪(n = 5)的代谢表型首次通过基于核磁共振(NMR)的血浆、胆汁和尿液等多种生物体液代谢组学分析得以阐明。通过多变量数据分析,将克隆猪的代谢表型与正常远交种猪(n = 6)进行比较,发现其代谢表型存在差异。克隆猪的血浆乳酸水平高于对照组,而胆汁中的多种代谢物发生了改变。然而,克隆猪的个体间变异性是否低于对照猪还不能确定。结论:从目前的研究中,我们得出克隆猪和正常近交种猪在表型上是不同的。然而,不能断定使用克隆动物会减少干预研究中的个体间差异,尽管这是基于有限数量的动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Physiology
BMC Physiology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Physiology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of physiological processes. BMC Physiology (ISSN 1472-6793) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus, Zoological Record and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Exercise endurance capacity is markedly reduced due to impaired energy homeostasis during prolonged fasting in FABP4/5 deficient mice. Deficiency of the BMP Type I receptor ALK3 partly protects mice from anemia of inflammation. Claudin expression during early postnatal development of the murine cochlea. Regulation of Locomotor activity in fed, fasted, and food-restricted mice lacking tissue-type plasminogen activator. Adiponectin is required for maintaining normal body temperature in a cold environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1