Direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty using computer navigation.

Stefan Kreuzer, Kevin Leffers
{"title":"Direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty using computer navigation.","authors":"Stefan Kreuzer,&nbsp;Kevin Leffers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The incorporation of computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been much slower than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason for this is that a majority of THAs are performed with the patient in the lateral position through a posterior or lateral approach, making the tracker placement and the registration process cumbersome. In the direct anterior approach, the patient is in the supine position, which accommodates pelvic tracker placement and markedly facilitates the registration process. At our institution, we use the direct anterior approach and computer navigation on all of our primary THAs. We hypothesized that computer navigation improves cup placement without increasing operative time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study comparing a consecutive series of 150 computer navigated THAs to a consecutive series of 150 non-navigated hips. The two groups were similarly matched by age, gender, and body mass index. Postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and operative times were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The navigation group mean cup inclination was 41° (range, 32° to 54°), compared to 36° (range, 19° to 52°) for the non-navigated group. The mean surgical time for the navigation group was 56 minutes (range, 34 to 91 minutes) and 61 minutes (range, 33 to 119 minutes) for the non-navigated group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that computer navigation is easy to incorporate when utilizing a direct anterior approach and in our series shortens the operative time. The accuracy and precision of cup angle placement is comparable to our non-navigated method but appears to be slightly improved with computer navigation. Although more work is needed for progress with this promising technology, we believe that incorporating computer navigation for hip arthroplasties in the supine position is straightforward and of great value.</p>","PeriodicalId":72485,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: The incorporation of computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been much slower than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason for this is that a majority of THAs are performed with the patient in the lateral position through a posterior or lateral approach, making the tracker placement and the registration process cumbersome. In the direct anterior approach, the patient is in the supine position, which accommodates pelvic tracker placement and markedly facilitates the registration process. At our institution, we use the direct anterior approach and computer navigation on all of our primary THAs. We hypothesized that computer navigation improves cup placement without increasing operative time.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study comparing a consecutive series of 150 computer navigated THAs to a consecutive series of 150 non-navigated hips. The two groups were similarly matched by age, gender, and body mass index. Postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and operative times were analyzed.

Results: The navigation group mean cup inclination was 41° (range, 32° to 54°), compared to 36° (range, 19° to 52°) for the non-navigated group. The mean surgical time for the navigation group was 56 minutes (range, 34 to 91 minutes) and 61 minutes (range, 33 to 119 minutes) for the non-navigated group.

Conclusion: The results suggest that computer navigation is easy to incorporate when utilizing a direct anterior approach and in our series shortens the operative time. The accuracy and precision of cup angle placement is comparable to our non-navigated method but appears to be slightly improved with computer navigation. Although more work is needed for progress with this promising technology, we believe that incorporating computer navigation for hip arthroplasties in the supine position is straightforward and of great value.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机导航直接前路全髋关节置换术。
未标记:全髋关节置换术(THA)中计算机导航的结合比全膝关节置换术(TKA)慢得多。其中一个原因是,大多数tha是通过后路或外侧入路在患者侧位进行的,这使得跟踪器的放置和登记过程非常繁琐。在直接前路入路中,患者采用仰卧位,这有利于骨盆跟踪器的放置,并显著促进定位过程。在我们的机构,我们使用直接前路入路和计算机导航在我们所有的主要tha。我们假设计算机导航可以在不增加手术时间的情况下改善手术罩杯的放置。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,比较了150个连续的计算机导航tha和150个连续的非导航髋关节。这两组人的年龄、性别和体重指数相似。分析术后骨盆前后位x线片及手术时间。结果:导航组的平均杯倾角为41°(范围,32°至54°),而非导航组的平均杯倾角为36°(范围,19°至52°)。导航组的平均手术时间为56分钟(范围34 ~ 91分钟),非导航组的平均手术时间为61分钟(范围33 ~ 119分钟)。结论:计算机导航在采用直接前路入路时很容易结合,并且在我们的系列中缩短了手术时间。杯子角度放置的准确性和精度与我们的非导航方法相当,但在计算机导航下似乎略有改善。虽然这项有前途的技术还需要更多的工作来取得进展,但我们相信在仰卧位的髋关节置换术中结合计算机导航是直截了当的,而且具有很大的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B-cell therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Focal neurological deficits due to a contrast enhancing lesion in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: case report and review of literature. Anterior spinal cord syndrome in a patient with Behçet's disease. Symptomatic babesiosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of a case and review of the literature. Pregnancy in a patient with Wegener's granulomatosis: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1