Increased incidence of loco-regional recurrences among african american women with terminal stage breast cancer.

Clinical medicine. Oncology Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-11-03 DOI:10.4137/cmo.s988
Gerardo Colón-Otero, Sherry King, Vandelyn Smith, Carolyn Bieber, Julia Crook, Lawrence A Solberg, Robert Shannon, Edith A Perez
{"title":"Increased incidence of loco-regional recurrences among african american women with terminal stage breast cancer.","authors":"Gerardo Colón-Otero,&nbsp;Sherry King,&nbsp;Vandelyn Smith,&nbsp;Carolyn Bieber,&nbsp;Julia Crook,&nbsp;Lawrence A Solberg,&nbsp;Robert Shannon,&nbsp;Edith A Perez","doi":"10.4137/cmo.s988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>A prospective analysis of women with terminal breast cancer admitted to CHNE from November 2006-August 2007 evaluated anecdotal observations that African American (AA) women are likelier than Caucasian women to evidence loco-regional recurrences (LRR). Women with terminal breast cancer who were admitted to CHNE, a not-for-profit hospice serving over 90% of Northeast Florida hospice patients, were eligible for participation. 134 terminal breast cancer patients were assessed by hospice nurses for LRR presence via chest wall examination. 80% of them (107) were Caucasian, 17% (23) were AA and 3% (4) were of other ethnicities. Evidence of LRR were noted in 13% of the women (17/134). The proportion of patients with LRR was higher in AA women than Caucasian women (26% vs. 10%, 6/23 vs. 11/107, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The majority of Caucasian women with LRR consented to a medical record review, but a minority of AA women consented (8/11 vs. 2/6, respectively, p = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluating disparities in breast cancer care outcomes is possible by reviewing data from patients served by hospice programs that aid a majority of patients within a community. This pilot data suggests that AA women with breast cancer have a higher incidence of loco-regional failure as a component of their terminal breast cancer disease than Caucasian women. A smaller proportion of AA patients and families agreed to participate in a medical record review study than Caucasians. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings, to elucidate factors contributing to disparities and to develop potential solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":88451,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","volume":"2 ","pages":"547-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/cmo.s988","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: A prospective analysis of women with terminal breast cancer admitted to CHNE from November 2006-August 2007 evaluated anecdotal observations that African American (AA) women are likelier than Caucasian women to evidence loco-regional recurrences (LRR). Women with terminal breast cancer who were admitted to CHNE, a not-for-profit hospice serving over 90% of Northeast Florida hospice patients, were eligible for participation. 134 terminal breast cancer patients were assessed by hospice nurses for LRR presence via chest wall examination. 80% of them (107) were Caucasian, 17% (23) were AA and 3% (4) were of other ethnicities. Evidence of LRR were noted in 13% of the women (17/134). The proportion of patients with LRR was higher in AA women than Caucasian women (26% vs. 10%, 6/23 vs. 11/107, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The majority of Caucasian women with LRR consented to a medical record review, but a minority of AA women consented (8/11 vs. 2/6, respectively, p = 0.16).

Conclusion: Evaluating disparities in breast cancer care outcomes is possible by reviewing data from patients served by hospice programs that aid a majority of patients within a community. This pilot data suggests that AA women with breast cancer have a higher incidence of loco-regional failure as a component of their terminal breast cancer disease than Caucasian women. A smaller proportion of AA patients and families agreed to participate in a medical record review study than Caucasians. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these findings, to elucidate factors contributing to disparities and to develop potential solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲裔美国妇女终末期乳腺癌的局部区域复发率增加。
未标记:一项对2006年11月至2007年8月住院的晚期乳腺癌妇女的前瞻性分析评估了轶事观察,非洲裔美国人(AA)妇女比白种人妇女更有可能出现局部区域复发(LRR)。CHNE是一家非营利性临终关怀医院,为佛罗里达州东北部90%以上的临终关怀患者提供服务,入院的晚期乳腺癌妇女有资格参加研究。134例晚期乳腺癌患者由安宁疗护护士通过胸壁检查评估LRR的存在。其中白种人107人,占80%,AA族23人,占17%,其他民族4人,占3%。13%的女性(17/134)存在LRR的证据。AA女性LRR患者比例高于高加索女性(分别为26% vs. 10%, 6/23 vs. 11/107),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.08)。大多数患有LRR的高加索妇女同意进行医疗记录审查,但少数AA妇女同意(分别为8/11对2/6,p = 0.16)。结论:评估乳腺癌护理结果的差异是可能的,通过回顾安宁疗护项目所服务的患者的数据,该项目帮助了社区内的大多数患者。这一试点数据表明,与高加索女性相比,AA女性乳腺癌患者的局部-区域衰竭发生率更高,这是其晚期乳腺癌的一个组成部分。与白种人相比,AA患者和家属同意参与医疗记录审查研究的比例较小。有必要进行更大规模的研究,以证实这些发现,阐明造成差异的因素,并制定可能的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: Results from a CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study. The metastasectomy and timing of pulmonary metastases on the outcome of osteosarcoma patients. A commentary on "risk factors for renal cell cancer in a Japanese population". Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging? Genomic heterogeneity of breast tumor pathogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1