Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of omeprazole.

Francisco J Flores-Murrieta, Miriam del C Carrasco-Portugal, Gerardo Reyes-García, Roberto Medina-Santillán, Jorge E Herrera
{"title":"Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of omeprazole.","authors":"Francisco J Flores-Murrieta,&nbsp;Miriam del C Carrasco-Portugal,&nbsp;Gerardo Reyes-García,&nbsp;Roberto Medina-Santillán,&nbsp;Jorge E Herrera","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Omeprazole is a very widely used proton-pump inhibitor. Currently, there are several branches available in Mexico, however, limited information about their bioavailabilities is available. The purpose of this study was to compare the bioavailability of two of them, Losec and Omelcid. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study that was carried out following the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki. Subjects read the protocol that was approved by the institutional research and ethics committees and gave written consent for participation. After an overnight fast, volunteers received an oral dose of 20 mg omeprazole (formulation A or B) and blood samples were obtained at selected times during 8 hours. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation and stored frozen until analyzed by a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by non-compartmental analysis and values (+/- s.e.m.) obtained were as follows: Cmax 354.28 +/- 51.57 and 308.95 +/- 44.42 ng/ml, t(max) 2.26 +/- 0.22 and 2.63 +/- 0.24 h and AUC(8h) 701.01 +/- 109.34 and 774.13 +/- 132.84 ngh/ml for formulations A and B respectively. Log transformed Cmax and AUC(8h) were compared by analysis of variance and 90% confidence limits of the parameters ratios (B/A) were 72.73-106.34% and 90.32-124.96%, for Cmax and AUC(8h) respectively. As confidence intervals did not exceed the 70-142.9% limits for Cmax and 80-125% for AUC(8h), it is concluded that the formulations tested are bioequivalent.</p>","PeriodicalId":20701,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Omeprazole is a very widely used proton-pump inhibitor. Currently, there are several branches available in Mexico, however, limited information about their bioavailabilities is available. The purpose of this study was to compare the bioavailability of two of them, Losec and Omelcid. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study that was carried out following the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki. Subjects read the protocol that was approved by the institutional research and ethics committees and gave written consent for participation. After an overnight fast, volunteers received an oral dose of 20 mg omeprazole (formulation A or B) and blood samples were obtained at selected times during 8 hours. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation and stored frozen until analyzed by a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by non-compartmental analysis and values (+/- s.e.m.) obtained were as follows: Cmax 354.28 +/- 51.57 and 308.95 +/- 44.42 ng/ml, t(max) 2.26 +/- 0.22 and 2.63 +/- 0.24 h and AUC(8h) 701.01 +/- 109.34 and 774.13 +/- 132.84 ngh/ml for formulations A and B respectively. Log transformed Cmax and AUC(8h) were compared by analysis of variance and 90% confidence limits of the parameters ratios (B/A) were 72.73-106.34% and 90.32-124.96%, for Cmax and AUC(8h) respectively. As confidence intervals did not exceed the 70-142.9% limits for Cmax and 80-125% for AUC(8h), it is concluded that the formulations tested are bioequivalent.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种口服奥美拉唑制剂的比较生物利用度。
奥美拉唑是一种应用非常广泛的质子泵抑制剂。目前,墨西哥有几个分支,然而,关于它们的生物利用度的信息有限。本研究的目的是比较其中两种,Losec和Omelcid的生物利用度。28名健康志愿者参加了这项根据《赫尔辛基宣言》建议开展的研究。受试者阅读由机构研究和伦理委员会批准的方案,并书面同意参与。禁食一夜后,志愿者口服奥美拉唑20mg(配方A或B),并在8小时内选择时间采集血样。血浆通过离心获得并冷冻保存,直到用有效的高效液相色谱法分析。通过非区室分析获得药代动力学参数,得到的+/- s.e.m值为:A和B的Cmax分别为354.28 +/- 51.57和308.95 +/- 44.42 ng/ml, t(max)分别为2.26 +/- 0.22和2.63 +/- 0.24 h, AUC(8h)分别为701.01 +/- 109.34和774.13 +/- 132.84 ng/ml。通过方差分析比较对数变换后的Cmax和AUC(8h), Cmax和AUC(8h)参数比值(B/A)的90%置信限分别为72.73 ~ 106.34%和90.32 ~ 124.96%。Cmax和AUC(8h)的置信区间均未超过70-142.9%和80-125%,说明所测制剂具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calmodulin antagonists inhibit sea urchin sperm hyperpolarization necessary for directed movement toward the egg. Valproic acid modulates brain plasticity through epigenetic chromatin remodeling in the blind rat: implications for human sight recovery. Treatment with LA-419 prevents monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension and lung injury in the rat. Ageing, health and medication consumption in a sample of academic employees at a Mexican university. An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1