Interlaboratory comparison of K-ras testing by real-time PCR and RFLP in colorectal cancer samples.

Andrea Judith Lanthaler, Gilbert Spizzo, Manfred Mitterer, Christine Mian, Guido Mazzoleni
{"title":"Interlaboratory comparison of K-ras testing by real-time PCR and RFLP in colorectal cancer samples.","authors":"Andrea Judith Lanthaler,&nbsp;Gilbert Spizzo,&nbsp;Manfred Mitterer,&nbsp;Christine Mian,&nbsp;Guido Mazzoleni","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"20 2","pages":"90-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e31820e5f9a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时荧光定量PCR与RFLP检测结直肠癌样本K-ras的实验室间比较。
在大约40%的结直肠癌患者中发现了K-ras的激活突变,并且与对表皮生长因子受体靶向抗体(如西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗)的耐药性有关。迫切需要成本效益高且简便的方法来确定K-ras突变。对31名患者的样本进行了检测。实验室1采用实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术。所有样本(n=31)在实验室2使用限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析进行额外检测。所有结果均通过直接测序证实。在第一次运行中,77.4%(31个样本中的24个)的实时PCR和RFLP结果一致。重新采样和评价后,一致性达到93.5%(30 / 31)。7例(6.5%)初始不一致病例中有1例(实时PCR)显示突变,RFLP未显示突变,但通过直接测序证实了突变。Real-time PCR和RFLP可以被认为是有效的K-ras突变检测技术。然而,在肿瘤细胞和野生型K-ras含量较低的患者探针中,建议进一步重新分析肿瘤组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
Index Molecular Testing for Respiratory Viruses Molecular Testing in Emerging Infectious Diseases Frequent PIK3CA mutations in radial scars. Pyrosequencing for EGFR mutation detection: diagnostic accuracy and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1